IBGP: Imperfect Byzantine Generals Problem for Zero-Shot Robustness in Communicative Multi-Agent Systems
Open accessAbstract
As large language model (LLM) agents increasingly integrate into our infrastructure, their robust coordination and message synchronization become vital. The Byzantine Generals Problem (BGP) is a critical model for constructing resilient multi-agent systems (MAS) under adversarial attacks. It describes a scenario where malicious agents with unknown identities exist in the system-situations that, in our context, could result from LLM agents' hallucinations or external attacks. In BGP, the objective of the entire system is to reach a consensus on the action to be taken. Traditional BGP requires global consensus among all agents; however, in practical scenarios, global consensus is not always necessary and can even be inefficient. Therefore, there is a pressing need to explore a refined version of BGP that aligns with the local coordination patterns observed in MAS. We refer to this refined version as Imperfect BGP (IBGP) in our research, aiming to address this discrepancy. To tackle this issue, we propose a framework that leverages consensus protocols within general MAS settings, providing provable resilience against communication attacks and adaptability to changing environments, as validated by empirical results. Additionally, we present a case study in a sensor network environment to illustrate the practical application of our protocol.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In multi-agent systems, ensuring adaptive network structures and robust communication frameworks to facilitate effective memory synchronization remains a challenge.
“Additionally, in multi-agent systems, ensuring adaptive network structures and robust communication frameworks (Mao et al., 2024; Marro et al., 2024; Liu et al., 2024b) to facilitate effective memory synchronization also remains as a challenge.”
From The AI Hippocampus: How Far are We From Human Memory? (2026) · cites this paper as Mao et al., 2024
The Introduction (page not specified) describes unreliable communication and the challenge of synchronizing messages among agents, supporting the robust-communication aspect. It does not address adaptive network structures or memory synchronization; its concern is message consistency and coordination. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Wendelin Böhmer, Vitaly Kurin, and Shimon Whiteson. 2020. Deep coordination graphs. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning.
- Miguel Castro and Barbara Liskov. 1999. Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance. In Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Imple- mentation (New Orleans, Louisiana, USA) (OSDI '99). USENIX Association, USA, 173-186.
- XiaoranWu; ZienHuang; ChonghanYu;. 2024. Animating the Past: Reconstruct Trilobite via Video Generation. (2024). https://doi.org/10.12074/202410.00084 · DOI
- Ali Dorri, Salil S Kanhere, and Raja Jurdak. 2018. Multi-agent systems: A survey. Ieee Access 6 (2018), 28573-28593.
- Ming-Can Fan, Hai-Tao Zhang, and Miaomiao Wang. 2014. Bipartite flocking for multi-agent systems. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 19, 9 (2014), 3313-3322.
- Junjie Fu and Jinzhi Wang. 2014. Adaptive coordinated tracking of multi-agent systems with quantized information. Systems & Control Letters 74 (2014), 115-125.
- Sirui Hong, Xiawu Zheng, Jonathan Chen, Yuheng Cheng, Jinlin Wang, Ceyao Zhang, Zili Wang, Steven Ka Shing Yau, Zijuan Lin, Liyang Zhou, et al. 2023. Metagpt: Meta programming for multi-agent collaborative framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.00352 (2023). · arXiv
- Yipeng Kang, Tonghan Wang, and Gerard de Melo. 2020. Incorporating prag- matic reasoning communication into emergent language. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020), 10348-10359.
- Yipeng Kang, Tonghan Wang, Qianlan Yang, Xiaoran Wu, and Chongjie Zhang. 2022. Non-Linear Coordination Graphs. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (2022), 25655-25666.
- Daiki Kishishita and Hiroyuki Ozaki. 2020. Public goods game with ambiguous threshold. Economics Letters 191 (2020), 109165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet. 2020.109165 · DOI
- Leslie Lamport, Robert Shostak, and Marshall Pease. 1982. The Byzantine Generals Problem. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 4, 3 (jul 1982), 382-401. https://doi.org/10.1145/357172.357176 · DOI · Paper page
- Shuai Liu, Lihua Xie, and Huanshui Zhang. 2014. Containment control of multi- agent systems by exploiting the control inputs of neighbors. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 24, 17 (2014), 2803-2818.
- Reza Olfati-Saber. 2006. Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: Algorithms and theory. IEEE Transactions on automatic control 51, 3 (2006), 401-420.
- Reza Olfati-Saber and Richard M Murray. 2004. Consensus problems in net- works of agents with switching topology and time-delays. IEEE Transactions on automatic control 49, 9 (2004), 1520-1533.
- R. Olfati-Saber and J.S. Shamma. 2005. Consensus Filters for Sensor Networks and Distributed Sensor Fusion. In Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. 6698-6703. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2005.1583238 · DOI
- Michael O. Rabin. 1983. Randomized byzantine generals. In 24th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1983). 403-409. https: //doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1983.48 · DOI
- Mikayel Samvelyan, Tabish Rashid, Christian Schröder de Witt, Gregory Farquhar, Nantas Nardelli, Tim G. J. Rudner, Chia-Man Hung, Philip H. S. Torr, Jakob N. Foerster, and Shimon Whiteson. 2019. The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge. CoRR abs/1902.04043 (2019). arXiv:1902.04043 http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.04043 · arXiv
- Kyunghwan Son, Daewoo Kim, Wan Ju Kang, David Earl Hostallero, and Yung Yi. 2019. QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Coopera- tive Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the 36th Interna- tional Conference on Machine Learning (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 97), Kamalika Chaudhuri and Ruslan Salakhutdinov (Eds.). PMLR, 5887-5896. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/son19a.html
- Peter Stone and Manuela Veloso. 2000. Multiagent systems: A survey from a machine learning perspective. Autonomous Robots 8 (2000), 345-383.
- Yanchao Sun, Ruijie Zheng, Parisa Hassanzadeh, Yongyuan Liang, Soheil Feizi, Sumitra Ganesh, and Furong Huang. 2023. Certifiably Robust Policy Learn- ing against Adversarial Multi-Agent Communication. In The Eleventh Interna- tional Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id= dCOL0inGl3e
- Tonghan Wang*, Jianhao Wang*, Chongyi Zheng, and Chongjie Zhang. 2020. Learning Nearly Decomposable Value Functions Via Communication Minimiza- tion. In International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview. net/forum?id=HJx-3grYDB
- Qingyun Wu, Gagan Bansal, Jieyu Zhang, Yiran Wu, Shaokun Zhang, Erkang Zhu, Beibin Li, Li Jiang, Xiaoyun Zhang, and Chi Wang. 2023. Autogen: Enabling next-gen llm applications via multi-agent conversation framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08155 (2023). · arXiv
- Lebin Yu, Yunbo Qiu, Quanming Yao, Yuan Shen, Xudong Zhang, and Jian Wang. 2024. Robust Communicative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Active Defense. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 38, 16 (Mar. 2024), 17575-17582. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29708 · DOI
- Wenwu Yu, Guanrong Chen, Ming Cao, and Jürgen Kurths. 2009. Second-order consensus for multiagent systems with directed topologies and nonlinear dynam- ics. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) 40, 3 (2009), 881-891.
- Ming Zhou, Jun Luo, Julian Villella, Yaodong Yang, David Rusu, Jiayu Miao, Weinan Zhang, Montgomery Alban, IMAN FADAKAR, Zheng Chen, Chongxi Huang, Ying Wen, Kimia Hassanzadeh, Daniel Graves, Zhengbang Zhu, Yi- han Ni, Nhat Nguyen, Mohamed Elsayed, Haitham Ammar, Alexander Cowen- Rivers, Sanjeevan Ahilan, Zheng Tian, Daniel Palenicek, Kasra Rezaee, Pey- man Yadmellat, Kun Shao, dong chen, Baokuan Zhang, Hongbo Zhang, Jianye Hao, Wulong Liu, and Jun Wang. 2021. SMARTS: An Open-Source Scalable Multi-Agent RL Training School for Autonomous Driving. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Robot Learning (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 155), Jens Kober, Fabio Ramos, and Claire Tomlin (Eds.). PMLR, 264-285. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v155/zhou21a.html
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The AI Hippocampus: How Far are We From Human Memory?
Jia, Z., Li, J., Kang, Y., Wang, Y., Wu, T., Wang, Q., Wang, X., Zhang, S., Shen, J., Li, Q., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.09113
Self-citation
- Authors
- Mao, Y., Kang, Y., Li, P., Zhang, N., Xu, W., & Zhang, C.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (CN)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2410.16237
- OpenAlex
- W4404304540
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Keywords
- Byzantine generals problem, multi-agent systems, LLM agents, consensus algorithms, adversarial attacks, communication attacks, message synchronization, local coordination, sensor networks, hallucinations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
