PreprintCited by 2Music and Audio ProcessingMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MMAU: A Massive Multi-Task Audio Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark

Open access

Abstract

The ability to comprehend audio--which includes speech, non-speech sounds, and music--is crucial for AI agents to interact effectively with the world. We present MMAU, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal audio understanding models on tasks requiring expert-level knowledge and complex reasoning. MMAU comprises 10k carefully curated audio clips paired with human-annotated natural language questions and answers spanning speech, environmental sounds, and music. It includes information extraction and reasoning questions, requiring models to demonstrate 27 distinct skills across unique and challenging tasks. Unlike existing benchmarks, MMAU emphasizes advanced perception and reasoning with domain-specific knowledge, challenging models to tackle tasks akin to those faced by experts. We assess 18 open-source and proprietary (Large) Audio-Language Models, demonstrating the significant challenges posed by MMAU. Notably, even the most advanced Gemini Pro v1.5 achieves only 52.97% accuracy, and the state-of-the-art open-source Qwen2-Audio achieves only 52.50%, highlighting considerable room for improvement. We believe MMAU will drive the audio and multimodal research community to develop more advanced audio understanding models capable of solving complex audio tasks.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2410.19168

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Building a unified audio-language model remains challenging because different tasks depend on different levels of acoustic abstraction, and many tasks are inherently temporal.

    “Building such a unified model remains challenging. Different tasks depend on different levels of acoustic abstraction: ASR requires fine-grained phonetic and lexical information, speech captioning relies on prosody and speaker attributes, environmental sound understanding often depends on short transient events, and reasoning-oriented tasks require semantic integration over longer contexts [1, 6,”

    From MOSS-Audio Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [14]

Citations

Cites

  • LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models

    Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., Martinet, X., Lachaux, M.-A., Lacroix, T., Rozière, B., Goyal, N., Hambro, E., Azhar, F., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.13971 · Cited by 4,602

  • Joint Audio and Speech Understanding

    Gong, Y., Liu, A. H., Luo, H., Karlinsky, L., & Glass, J. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.14405 · Cited by 67 · cited 1×

    “…et al., 2023), multilingual proficiency (Ahuja et al., 2023), multidisciplinary understanding (Yue et al., 2024; Hu et al., 2024), perception tests (Yuan et al., 2023), mathematical reasoning (Li et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2024), and video understanding (Li et al., 2023; Ning et al., 2023; Fu et…”

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Large Language Model Reasoning Failures

    Song, P., Han, P., & Goodman, N. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.06176 · Cited by 3

  • MOSS-Audio Technical Report

    Yang, C., Yu, C., Chen, H., Zhu, J., Chen, J., Chen, K., Wang, W., Wang, Y., Jiang, Y., Jiang, Y., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.01802

    “These results indicate that a unified audio-language model can support both precise audio recognition and higher-level audio reasoning, positioning MOSS-Audio as a promising understanding foundation for future voice agents [1, 14, 15, 18]. with the semantic space of a general-purpose language model.”

Metadata

Authors
Sakshi, S., Tyagi, U., Kumar, S., Seth, A., Selvakumar, R., Nieto, O., Duraiswami, R., Ghosh, S., & Manocha, D.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404311027
Cited by
1
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
audio understanding, audio-language models, speech understanding, environmental sounds, musical understanding, information extraction, large language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review