Comparative Global AI Regulation: Policy Perspectives from the EU, China, and the US
Open accessAbstract
As a powerful and rapidly advancing dual-use technology, AI offers both immense benefits and worrisome risks. In response, governing bodies around the world are developing a range of regulatory AI laws and policies. This paper compares three distinct approaches taken by the EU, China and the US. Within the US, we explore AI regulation at both the federal and state level, with a focus on California's pending Senate Bill 1047. Each regulatory system reflects distinct cultural, political and economic perspectives. Each also highlights differing regional perspectives on regulatory risk-benefit tradeoffs, with divergent judgments on the balance between safety versus innovation and cooperation versus competition. Finally, differences between regulatory frameworks reflect contrastive stances in regards to trust in centralized authority versus trust in a more decentralized free market of self-interested stakeholders. Taken together, these varied approaches to AI innovation and regulation influence each other, the broader international community, and the future of AI regulation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The EU, China, and US have developed regulatory approaches reflecting distinct cultural, political, and economic values: the EU prioritizes fundamental rights through a tiered risk framework, the US relies on sectoral self-regulation and market competition, and China treats AI as sociotechnical infrastructure under state control.
“mientras la UE prioriza la protección de derechos fundamentales mediante un marco de riesgo escalonado, Estados Unidos confía en la autorregulación sectorial y en la competencia de mercado, y China concibe la IA como infraestructura sociotécnica sujeta al control estatal.”
From El Reto del Marketing Social ante la Inteligencia Artificial: un análisis comparado en distintos contextos geográficos y sistemas políticos (2026) · cites this paper as Chun et al., 2024
Split into 3 atoms — 2 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA second divergence concerns the ultimate purpose attributed to regulation: protection of individual rights in the EU, preservation of market competition in the US, and maintenance of sociotechnical order in China.
“Una segunda divergencia concierne a la finalidad última atribuida a la regulación: protección de derechos individuales en la Unión Europea, preservación de la competencia de mercado en Estados Unidos, y mantenimiento del orden sociotécnico en China.”
From El Reto del Marketing Social ante la Inteligencia Artificial: un análisis comparado en distintos contextos geográficos y sistemas políticos (2026) · cites this paper as Chun et al., 2024
Section 4.1 (p. 3) describes a fundamental-rights agenda in the EU AI Act, and section 5.1 (p. 9) says China emphasizes social harmony. Section 6.3 (p. 16) says the US approach promotes innovation through competition, but does not identify preservation of market competition as its ultimate purpose. The paper also describes multiple aims in each jurisdiction, so the claim's three-way account of their ultimate purposes is too categorical. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe main regulatory divergence is the degree of centralization: the EU codified AI risks in a single legal instrument, the US delegated regulation to sectoral agencies and state jurisprudence, and China integrated AI regulation into state governance of public information.
“La principal divergencia se refiere al grado de centralización regulatoria: mientras la Unión Europea ha optado por codificar exhaustivamente los riesgos de la IA en un instrumento jurídico único, Estados Unidos ha preferido delegar la regulación en agencias sectoriales y en la jurisprudencia estatal, y China ha integrado la regulación de la IA dentro de una lógica de gobernanza estatal de la”
From El Reto del Marketing Social ante la Inteligencia Artificial: un análisis comparado en distintos contextos geográficos y sistemas políticos (2026) · cites this paper as Chun et al., 2024
The AI Governance section (p. 3) contrasts the EU’s centralized, risk-based AI Act with a decentralized US approach, and the Conclusion (p. 26) describes US oversight delegated to federal agencies. But the paper discusses state regulations rather than state jurisprudence; it also characterizes China’s system as a hybrid that includes decentralized local innovation (5.1 Overview, p. 9), not simply as state governance of public information. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe challenge of social marketing before AI cannot be reduced to a merely technological question; it is a phenomenon deeply rooted in the legal, political, and cultural traditions of each region.
“Los hallazgos de este análisis comparativo sugieren que el reto del marketing social ante la inteligencia artificial no puede reducirse a una cuestión meramente tecnológica, sino que constituye un fenómeno profundamente enraizado en las tradiciones jurídicas, políticas y culturales de cada región.”
From El Reto del Marketing Social ante la Inteligencia Artificial: un análisis comparado en distintos contextos geográficos y sistemas políticos (2026) · cites this paper as Chun et al., 2024
The paper’s Abstract (p. 1) says that EU, Chinese, and US approaches to AI regulation reflect distinct cultural and political perspectives, supporting the regional context of the claim. It analyzes AI governance, however, not the challenge of social marketing in particular; that application is not established by the cited paper. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [5]5. Bloomberg News. In its latest crackdown, china intensifies focus on real estate. Aljazeera.com , July 2021. URL https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/ 2021/7/28/in-its-latest-crackdown-china-intensifies-focus-onreal-estate . Accessed: May 2, 2024. - A. Bradford. The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Faculty Books , Mar. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190088583. 001.0001. URL https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/books/232 . · DOI
- [7]7. Consilium. Artificial intelligence act: Council and Parliament strike a deal on the first rules for AI in the world, 2023. URL https: //www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023/12/09/ artificial-intelligence-act-council-and-parliament-strike-adeal-on-the-first-worldwide-rules-for-ai/ . - C. Coons, M. Blackburn, A. Klobuchar, and T. Tillis. No fakes act, 2023. URL https://www.coons.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/no\_fakes\_ act\_one\_pager.pdf . - M. A. Cusumano, A. Gawer, and D. B. Yoffie. Social media companies should self-regulate. now. Harvard Business Review , January 2021. URL https://hbr.org/2021/01/social-media-companies-shouldself-regulate-now . - F. Eiras, A. Petrov, B. Vidgen, C. S. de Witt, F. Pizzati, K. Elkins, S. Mukhopadhyay, A. Bibi, B. Csaba, F. Steibel, F. Barez, G. Smith, G. Guadagni, J. Chun, J. Cabot, J. M. Imperial, J. A. Nolazco-Flores, L. Landay, M. Jackson, P. R¨ ottger, P. H. S. Torr, T. Darrell, Y. S. Lee, and J. Foerster. Near to Mid-term Risks and Opportunities of Open-Source Generative AI, May 2024a. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.17047 . arXiv:2404.17047 [cs]. - F. Eiras, A. Petrov, B. Vidgen, C. Schroeder, F. Pizzati, K. Elkins, S. Mukhopadhyay, A. Bibi, A. Purewal, C. Botos, F. Steibel, F. Keshtkar, F. Barez, G. Smith, G. Guadagni, J. Chun, J. Cabot, J. Imperial, J. A. Nolazco, L. Landay, M. Jackson, P. H. S. Torr, T. Darrell, Y. Lee, and J. Foerster. Risks and Opportunities of Open-Source Generative AI, May 2024b. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08597 . · arXiv
- [10]10. GDPR Local. California's senate bill 1047: Key takeaways on california's ai safety bill, 2024. URL https://gdprlocal.com/californias-senatebill-1047-key-takeaways-on-californias-ai-safety-bill/ . Accessed: 2024-09-16. - Global Times. China to develop 10,000 'little giants' in push for advanced manufacturing. GlobalTimes.cn , July 2021. URL https://www.globaltimes. cn/page/202107/1227877.shtml . Accessed: May 2, 2024. - GovTrack.us. Govtrack.us, 2024. URL https://www.govtrack.us/ . Accessed: 16 Sept. 2024. - S. Gracias. Comparing eu ai act to proposed ai-related legislation in the us. University of Chicago Business Law Review , 2024. - Huggingface.co. Models, May 2024. URL https://huggingface.co/models . Accessed: May 2, 2024. - Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF). How innovative is china in ai? ITIF, 2024. URL https://itif.org/publications/2024/08/ 26/how-innovative-is-china-in-ai/ . Accessed: 2024-09-23. - International Association of Privacy Professionals. Us state ai governance legislation tracker, 2024. URL https://iapp.org/resources/article/usstate-ai-governance-legislation-tracker/ . Accessed: 16 Sept. 2024. - International Monetary Fund. World economic outlook: April 2024, April 2024. URL https://meetings.imf.org/en/IMF/Home/Publications/WEO/ Issues/2024/04/16/world-economic-outlook-april-2024 . Accessed: May 2, 2024. - G. Intresse. China's new draft regulations for after-school tutoring. China-Briefing.com , February 2024. URL https://www.chinabriefing.com/news/china-after-school-tutoring-new-draftregulations-key-points/ . Accessed: May 2, 2024. - A. Klobuchar. Real political advertisements act, 2023. URL https://www. congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/1596/text . - LAION. A Call to Protect Open-Source AI in Europe | LAION, 2023. URL https://laion.ai/notes/letter-to-the-eu-parliament . - LegiScan. California senate bill 1047: Safe and secure innovation for frontier Artificial Intelligence models act, 2024. URL https://legiscan.com/CA/ text/SB1047/2023 . Accessed: May 1, 2024. - Linklaters. Data Protected Philippines | Insights | Linklaters, 2024. URL https://www.linklaters.com/en/insights/data-protected/dataprotected---philippines . - G. Lovely. Sag-aftra and women's groups urge gavin newsom to sign ai safety bill, sep 2024. URL https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/11/24242142/sagaftra-ai-now-gavin-newsom-safety-sb-1047-letters . Accessed: 202409-18. - T. Madiega. Artificial intelligence act, 2024. URL https://www.europarl. europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/698792/EPRS\_BRI(2021)698792\_ EN.pdf . - A. Massoglia. State and federal lobbying spending tops $ 46 billion after federal lobbying spending broke records in 2023. OpenSecrets.com , January 2024. URL https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2024/01/stateand-federal-lobbying-spending-tops-46-billion-after-federallobbying-spending-broke-records-in-2023 . - M. Minow and N. Minow. Social media companies should pursue serious self-supervision- soon: Response to professors douek and kadri. Harvard Law Review , June 2023. URL https://harvardlawreview.org/forum/vol136/social-media-companies-should-pursue-serious-selfsupervision-soon-response-to-professors-douek-and-kadri/ .
- [5]5. National Conference of State Legislatures. Ai 2024 legislation, June 2023. URL https://www.ncsl.org/technology-and-communication/ artificial-intelligence-2024-legislation . Accessed: July 12, 2024.
- [4]4. White and Case. Ai watch global regulatory tracker us, 2024. URL https://www.whitecase.com/insight-our-thinking/ai-watch-globalregulatory-tracker-united-states . Accessed: 2024-09-25. - Z. Yang. Why the chinese government is sparing ai from harsh regulations-for now. MIT Technology Review , April 2024. URL https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/04/09/1091004/china-techregulation-harsh-zhang/ . Accessed: May 2, 2024. - A. Zhang. High Wire: How China Regulates Big Tech and Governs Its Economy . Oxford University Press, 2022. - A. H. Zhang. How china regulates big tech and governs ai, March 2024. URL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NS1DGd2IXDs . Philip K.H. Wong Centre for Chinese Law [Video]. YouTube. Accessed: May 2, 2024.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
García, N. D. R., & Fernández, A. M. D. E. (2026) · Brazilian Journal of Business · doi:10.34140/bjbv8n3-150
- Authors
- Chun, J., de Witt, C. S., & Elkins, K.
- Affiliations
- Kenyon College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chun, Jon
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2410.21279
- OpenAlex
- W4408538044
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 17
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
- Keywords
- AI regulation, comparative policy analysis, EU AI policy, United States AI policy, global AI governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
