PreprintCited by 2Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobot Manipulation and LearningDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

A Large Recurrent Action Model: xLSTM enables Fast Inference for Robotics Tasks

Open access

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a trend in the field of Reinforcement Learning (RL) towards large action models trained offline on large-scale datasets via sequence modeling. Existing models are primarily based on the Transformer architecture, which result in powerful agents. However, due to slow inference times, Transformer-based approaches are impractical for real-time applications, such as robotics. Recently, modern recurrent architectures, such as xLSTM and Mamba, have been proposed that exhibit parallelization benefits during training similar to the Transformer architecture while offering fast inference. In this work, we study the aptitude of these modern recurrent architectures for large action models. Consequently, we propose a Large Recurrent Action Model (LRAM) with an xLSTM at its core that comes with linear-time inference complexity and natural sequence length extrapolation abilities. Experiments on 432 tasks from 6 domains show that LRAM compares favorably to Transformers in terms of performance and speed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2410.22391

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The application of xLSTM in deep reinforcement learning approaches has been minimally explored and is limited to a single research study.

    “In a more general context, the application of xLSTM in deep reinforcement learning approaches has been minimally explored and is limited to a single research study [8].”
  • The xLSTM architecture has excelled in other domains, such as computer vision, robotics, molecular biology, and time series.

    “Moreover, this architecture also excelled in other domains, such as computer vision (Alkin et al., 2025), robotics (Schmied et al., 2024), molecular biology (Schmidinger et al., 2025), and time series (Kraus et al., 2024).”

    From xLSTM 7B: A Recurrent LLM for Fast and Efficient Inference (2025) · cites this paper as Schmied et al., 2024

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schmied, T., Adler, T., Patil, V., Beck, M., Pöppel, K., Brandstetter, J., Klambauer, G., Pascanu, R., & Hochreiter, S.
Affiliations
  • Linz Center of Mechatronics (Austria) (AT)
  • Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404342228
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Austrian Science Fund (10.55776/FG9, FG 9-N)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
xLSTM, recurrent neural networks, Mamba, offline reinforcement learning, fast inference, robot control, linear-time inference, Transformer comparison, large-scale datasets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review