The DOI matches its DataCite record.
A Large Recurrent Action Model: xLSTM enables Fast Inference for Robotics Tasks
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, there has been a trend in the field of Reinforcement Learning (RL) towards large action models trained offline on large-scale datasets via sequence modeling. Existing models are primarily based on the Transformer architecture, which result in powerful agents. However, due to slow inference times, Transformer-based approaches are impractical for real-time applications, such as robotics. Recently, modern recurrent architectures, such as xLSTM and Mamba, have been proposed that exhibit parallelization benefits during training similar to the Transformer architecture while offering fast inference. In this work, we study the aptitude of these modern recurrent architectures for large action models. Consequently, we propose a Large Recurrent Action Model (LRAM) with an xLSTM at its core that comes with linear-time inference complexity and natural sequence length extrapolation abilities. Experiments on 432 tasks from 6 domains show that LRAM compares favorably to Transformers in terms of performance and speed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The application of xLSTM in deep reinforcement learning approaches has been minimally explored and is limited to a single research study.
“In a more general context, the application of xLSTM in deep reinforcement learning approaches has been minimally explored and is limited to a single research study [8].”
From A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach to Automated Stock Trading, using xLSTM Networks (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
The xLSTM architecture has excelled in other domains, such as computer vision, robotics, molecular biology, and time series.
“Moreover, this architecture also excelled in other domains, such as computer vision (Alkin et al., 2025), robotics (Schmied et al., 2024), molecular biology (Schmidinger et al., 2025), and time series (Kraus et al., 2024).”
From xLSTM 7B: A Recurrent LLM for Fast and Efficient Inference (2025) · cites this paper as Schmied et al., 2024
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
xLSTM 7B: A Recurrent LLM for Fast and Efficient Inference
Beck, M., Pöppel, K., Lippe, P., Kurle, R., Blies, P. M., Klambauer, G., Böck, S., & Hochreiter, S. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.13427 · Cited by 9
“Moreover, this architecture also excelled in other domains, such as computer vision (Alkin et al., 2025), robotics (Schmied et al., 2024), molecular biology (Schmidinger et al., 2025), and time series (Kraus et al., 2024).”
Self-citationA Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach to Automated Stock Trading, using xLSTM Networks
Sarlakifar, F., Asl, M. M., Khaledi, S. R., & Salimi-Badr, A. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.09655 · Cited by 5
“In a more general context, the application of xLSTM in deep reinforcement learning approaches has been minimally explored and is limited to a single research study [8].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmied, T., Adler, T., Patil, V., Beck, M., Pöppel, K., Brandstetter, J., Klambauer, G., Pascanu, R., & Hochreiter, S.
- Affiliations
- Linz Center of Mechatronics (Austria) (AT)
- Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2410.22391
- OpenAlex
- W4404342228
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Austrian Science Fund (10.55776/FG9, FG 9-N)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- xLSTM, recurrent neural networks, Mamba, offline reinforcement learning, fast inference, robot control, linear-time inference, Transformer comparison, large-scale datasets
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review