PreprintCited by 7Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fault-tolerant quantum computation with a neutral atom processor

Open access

Abstract

Quantum computing experiments are transitioning from running on physical qubits to using encoded, logical qubits. Fault-tolerant computation can identify and correct errors, and has the potential to enable the dramatically reduced logical error rates required for valuable algorithms. However, it requires flexible control of high-fidelity operations performed on large numbers of qubits. We demonstrate fault-tolerant quantum computation on a quantum processor with 256 qubits, each an individual neutral Ytterbium atom. The operations are designed so that key error sources convert to atom loss, which can be detected by imaging. Full connectivity is enabled by atom movement. We demonstrate the entanglement of 24 logical qubits encoded into 48 atoms, at once catching errors and correcting for, on average 1.8, lost atoms. We also implement the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm with up to 28 logical qubits encoded into 112 atoms, showing better-than-physical error rates. In both cases, "erasure conversion," changing errors into a form that can be detected independently from qubit state, improves circuit performance. These results begin to clear a path for achieving scientific quantum advantage with a programmable neutral atom quantum processor.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2411.11822

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mobile qubit architectures, such as QCCD and optical tweezers, can distribute resources more efficiently than stationary qubit architectures because qubits flow through the QPU like bits in a classical processor.

    “However, mobile qubit architectures, such as QCCD and optical tweezers24,25, can distribute resources more efficiently than stationary qubit architectures26–28, because qubits flow through the QPU like bits in a classical processor, with separated memory structures, data buses and logic units, each optimized for their purpose12.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Reichardt, B. W., Paetznick, A., Aasen, D., Basov, I., Bello-Rivas, J. M., Bonderson, P., Chao, R., van Dam, W., Hastings, M. B., Mishmash, R. V., Paz, A., da Silva, M. P., Sundaram, A., Svore, K. M., Vaschillo, A., Wang, Z., Zanner, M., Cairncross, W. B., Chen, C.-A., Crow, D., Kim, H., Kindem, J. M., King, J., McDonald, M., Norcia, M. A., Ryou, A., Stone, M., Wadleigh, L., Barnes, K., Battaglino, P., Bohdanowicz, T. C., Booth, G., Brown, A., Brown, M. O., Cassella, K., Coxe, R., Epstein, J. M., Feldkamp, M., Griger, C., Halperin, E., Heinz, A., Hummel, F., Jaffe, M., Jones, A. M. W., Kapit, E., Kotru, K., Lauigan, J., Li, M., Marjanovic, J., Megidish, E., Meredith, M., Morshead, R., Muniz, J. A., Narayanaswami, S., Nishiguchi, C., Paule, T., Pawlak, K. A., Pudenz, K. L., Pérez, D. R., Simon, J., Smull, A., Stack, D., Urbanek, M., van de Veerdonk, R. J. M., Vendeiro, Z., Weverka, R. T., Wilkason, T., Wu, T.-Y., Xie, X., Zalys-Geller, E., Zhang, X., & Bloom, B. J.
Affiliations
  • California Southern University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Atom Computing (United States) (US)
  • Colorado School of Mines (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404573320
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Keywords
fault-tolerant quantum computing, neutral-atom quantum processors, ytterbium atoms, logical qubits, error correction, entanglement, Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm, quantum advantage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review