Closer Look at Efficient Inference Methods: A Survey of Speculative Decoding
Open accessAbstract
Efficient inference in large language models (LLMs) has become a critical focus as their scale and complexity grow. Traditional autoregressive decoding, while effective, suffers from computational inefficiencies due to its sequential token generation process. Speculative decoding addresses this bottleneck by introducing a two-stage framework: drafting and verification. A smaller, efficient model generates a preliminary draft, which is then refined by a larger, more sophisticated model. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of speculative decoding methods, categorizing them into draft-centric and model-centric approaches. We discuss key ideas associated with each method, highlighting their potential for scaling LLM inference. This survey aims to guide future research in optimizing speculative decoding and its integration into real-world LLM applications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Speculative decoding accelerates LLM inference through a draft-then-verify framework that transforms sequential decoding into a parallel operation while maintaining accuracy.
“By transforming sequential decoding into a parallelization operation, this technique achieves substantial improvements in speed while maintaining accuracy (Zhang, Liu, and Song 2024; Hu et al. 2025; Ryu and Kim 2024).”
From Talon: Breaking the Synchronization Barrier in Speculative Decoding with Hybrid Model-based and Retrieve-based Drafting (2026) · cites this paper as Ryu and Kim 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. CoRR, abs/2005.14165. · arXiv
- John L. Hennessy and David A. Patterson. 2012. Com- puter Architecture: A quantitative approach, 5 edi- tion. Elsevier.
- Chi-Heng Lin, Shikhar Tuli, James Smith, Yen-Chang Hsu, Yilin Shen, and Hongxia Jin. 2024a. SLiM: Speculative decoding with hypothesis reduction. In Findings of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics: NAACL 2024, pages 1005-1017, Mexico City, Mexico. Association for Computational Lin- guistics. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gao, X., Xie, W., Lixin, Fang, X., Hang, C., Li, C., Lin, Y., & Xu, X. (2026) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v40i25.39266
- Authors
- Ryu, H., & Kim, E.
- Affiliations
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2411.13157
- OpenAlex
- W4404648869
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- speculative decoding, large language models, inference efficiency, autoregressive decoding, two-stage decoding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
