The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compressed Chain of Thought: Efficient Reasoning Through Dense Representations
Open accessAbstract
Chain-of-thought (CoT) decoding enables language models to improve reasoning performance at the cost of high generation latency in decoding. Recent proposals have explored variants of contemplation tokens, a term we introduce that refers to special tokens used during inference to allow for extra computation. Prior work has considered fixed-length sequences drawn from a discrete set of embeddings as contemplation tokens. Here we propose Compressed Chain-of-Thought (CCoT), a framework to generate contentful and continuous contemplation tokens of variable sequence length. The generated contemplation tokens are compressed representations of explicit reasoning chains, and our method can be applied to off-the-shelf decoder language models. Through experiments, we illustrate how CCoT enables additional reasoning over dense contentful representations to achieve corresponding improvements in accuracy. Moreover, the reasoning improvements can be adaptively modified on demand by controlling the number of contemplation tokens generated.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, CCOT [20] condenses long CoT reasoning into short contentful and continuous contemplation tokens .”
From Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
LLMLingua: Compressing Prompts for Accelerated Inference of Large Language Models
Jiang, H., Wu, Q., Lin, C.-Y., Yang, Y., & Qiu, L. (2023) · arXiv · Cited by 168 · cited 1×
“While most techniques rely on access to the intermediate hidden states of LLMs, there has also been work done in the context of API-only LLMs (Jiang et al., 2023).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models
Sui, Y., Chuang, Y.-N., Wang, G., Zhang, J., Zhang, T., Yuan, J., Liu, H., Wen, A., Zhong, S., Zou, N., et al. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 517
“…[95]; CoT-Valve [59]; Self-Training [62]; Learn to Skip [53]; Token-Budget [34]; ReasoningOutput-based Latent e.g. Coconut [35]; CODI [75]; CCoT [12]; Heima [73]; Token Assorted [79]; Loop [70]; SoftCoT [100]; DynamicReasoningParadigm e.g. Speculative Rejection [81]; Sampling-Efficient TTS…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, J., & Van Durme, B.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2412.13171
- OpenAlex
- W4405562786
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- dense representations, reasoning chains, language model inference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review