MRAG: A Modular Retrieval Framework for Time-Sensitive Question Answering
Open accessAbstract
Understanding temporal relations and answering time-sensitive questions is crucial yet a challenging task for question-answering systems powered by large language models (LLMs). Existing approaches either update the parametric knowledge of LLMs with new facts, which is resource-intensive and often impractical, or integrate LLMs with external knowledge retrieval (i.e., retrieval-augmented generation). However, off-the-shelf retrievers often struggle to identify relevant documents that require intensive temporal reasoning. To systematically study time-sensitive question answering, we introduce the TempRAGEval benchmark, which repurposes existing datasets by incorporating temporal perturbations and gold evidence labels. As anticipated, all existing retrieval methods struggle with these temporal reasoning-intensive questions. We further propose Modular Retrieval (MRAG), a trainless framework that includes three modules: (1) Question Processing that decomposes question into a main content and a temporal constraint; (2) Retrieval and Summarization that retrieves evidence and uses LLMs to summarize according to the main content; (3) Semantic-Temporal Hybrid Ranking that scores each evidence summarization based on both semantic and temporal relevance. On TempRAGEval, MRAG significantly outperforms baseline retrievers in retrieval performance, leading to further improvements in final answer accuracy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The necessity of temporal validity propels the evolution of memory mechanisms from static storage toward active management, integrating temporal awareness, decay policies, and flexible retrieval.
“This necessity propels the evolution of memory mechanisms from the paradigm of static storage toward that of active management, integrating awareness of temporal factors, policies for decay, and methods for retrieval with enhanced flexibility (Zhong et al., 2023; Siyue et al., 2024; Salama et al., 2025; Du et al., 2025a; Houichime et al., 2025).”
From From Storage to Experience: A Survey on the Evolution of LLM Agent Memory Mechanisms (2026) · cites this paper as Siyue et al., 2024
Section 4, “MRAG: Modular Retrieval” (page not provided), supports temporally aware, flexible retrieval: MRAG separates temporal from semantic relevance and ranks evidence using both. It does not describe memory mechanisms evolving from static storage to active management or introduce decay policies. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- Akari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2024. Self-rag: Learning to re- trieve, generate, and critique through self-reflection. In International Conference on Learning Representa- tions.
- Steven Bird and Edward Loper. 2004. NLTK: The nat- ural language toolkit. In Proceedings of the ACL Interactive Poster and Demonstration Sessions.
- Wenhu Chen, Xinyi Wang, and William Yang Wang. 2021. A dataset for answering time-sensitive ques- tions. 2021 Conference on Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks.
- Ziyang Chen, Xiang Zhao, Jinzhi Liao, Xinyi Li, and Evangelos Kanoulas. 2022. Temporal knowledge graph question answering via subgraph reasoning. Know.-Based Syst. · DOI
- Zheng Chu, Jingchang Chen, Qianglong Chen, Wei- jiang Yu, Haotian Wang, Ming Liu, and Bing Qin. 2024. TimeBench: A comprehensive evaluation of temporal reasoning abilities in large language models. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 8 https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause 9 https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.
- Gautier Izacard, Mathilde Caron, Lucas Hosseini, Sebas- tian Riedel, Piotr Bojanowski, Armand Joulin, and Edouard Grave. 2021. Unsupervised dense informa- tion retrieval with contrastive learning. Transactions on Machine Learning Research.
- Gautier Izacard, Fabio Petroni, Lucas Hosseini, Nicola De Cao, Sebastian Riedel, and Edouard Grave. 2020. A memory efficient baseline for open domain ques- tion answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.15156. · arXiv
- Zhen Jia, Soumajit Pramanik, Rishiraj Saha Roy, and Gerhard Weikum. 2021. Complex temporal question answering on knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Informa- tion and Knowledge Management. · DOI
- Bowen Jin, Hansi Zeng, Zhenrui Yue, Jinsung Yoon, Sercan Arik, Dong Wang, Hamed Zamani, and Jiawei Han. 2025. Search-r1: Training llms to reason and leverage search engines with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09516. · arXiv
- Zhuoran Jin, Pengfei Cao, Yubo Chen, Kang Liu, Xiao- jian Jiang, Jiexin Xu, Li Qiuxia, and Jun Zhao. 2024. Tug-of-war between knowledge: Exploring and re- solving knowledge conflicts in retrieval-augmented language models. In Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguis- tics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC- COLING 2024).
- Nikhil Kandpal, Haikang Deng, Adam Roberts, Eric Wallace, and Colin Raffel. 2023. Large language models struggle to learn long-tail knowledge. In In- ternational Conference on Machine Learning, pages 15696-15707.
- PMLR.
- Vladimir Karpukhin, Barlas Oguz, Sewon Min, Patrick Lewis, Ledell Wu, Sergey Edunov, Danqi Chen, and Wen-tau Yih. 2020. Dense passage retrieval for open- domain question answering. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
- Omar Khattab and Matei Zaharia. 2020. Colbert: Effi- cient and effective passage search via contextualized late interaction over bert. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. · DOI · Paper page
- Xiaoxi Li, Guanting Dong, Jiajie Jin, Yuyao Zhang, Yujia Zhou, Yutao Zhu, Peitian Zhang, and Zhicheng Dou. 2025. Search-o1: Agentic search-enhanced large reasoning models. CoRR. · DOI
- Adam Liška, Tomáš Kočiský, Elena Gribovskaya, Tay- fun Terzi, Eren Sezener, Devang Agrawal, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Tim Scholtes, Manzil Zaheer, Susannah Young, Ellen Gilsenan-McMahon Sophia Austin, Phil Blunsom, and Angeliki Lazaridou. 2022. Streamingqa: A benchmark for adaptation to new knowledge over time in question answering models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11388. · arXiv
- Nelson F Liu, Kevin Lin, John Hewitt, Ashwin Paran- jape, Michele Bevilacqua, Fabio Petroni, and Percy Liang. 2024. Lost in the middle: How language mod- els use long contexts. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Yonghao Liu, Di Liang, Mengyu Li, Fausto Giunchiglia, Ximing Li, Sirui Wang, Wei Wu, Lan Huang, Xi- aoyue Feng, and Renchu Guan. 2023. Local and global: temporal question answering via information fusion. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Interna- tional Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. · DOI
- Sean MacAvaney, Franco Maria Nardini, Raffaele Perego, Nicola Tonellotto, Nazli Goharian, and Ophir Frieder. 2020. Efficient document re-ranking for transformers by precomputing term representations. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SI- GIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. · DOI
- Niklas Muennighoff, Nouamane Tazi, Loic Magne, and Nils Reimers. 2023. MTEB: Massive text embedding benchmark. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics. Pageviews. 2024. Pageviews analysis. https://page views.wmcloud.org/. Accessed: 2024-11-26.
- Quang Hieu Pham, Hoang Ngo, Anh Tuan Luu, and Dat Quoc Nguyen. 2024. Who's who: Large lan- guage models meet knowledge conflicts in practice. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024.
- Xinying Qian, Ying Zhang, Yu Zhao, Baohang Zhou, Xuhui Sui, Li Zhang, and Kehui Song. 2024. Timer4: Time-aware retrieval-augmented large language mod- els for temporal knowledge graph question answering. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
- Amit Rozner, Barak Battash, Lior Wolf, and Ofir Lin- denbaum. 2024. Knowledge editing in language mod- els via adapted direct preference optimization. In Findings of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics: EMNLP 2024.
- Apoorv Saxena, Soumen Chakrabarti, and Partha Taluk- dar. 2021. Question answering over temporal knowl- edge graphs. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics.
- Aditya Sharma, Apoorv Saxena, Chitrank Gupta, Mehran Kazemi, Partha Talukdar, and Soumen Chakrabarti. 2023. TwiRGCN: Temporally weighted graph convolution for question answering over tem- poral knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics.
- Zhaochen Su, Jun Zhang, Tong Zhu, Xiaoye Qu, Juntao Li, Min Zhang, and Yu Cheng. 2024b. Timo: To- wards better temporal reasoning for language models. Proceedings of the Conference on Language Model.
- Qingyu Tan, Hwee Tou Ng, and Lidong Bing. 2023. Towards benchmarking and improving the temporal reasoning capability of large language models. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Nandan Thakur, Nils Reimers, Johannes Daxenberger, and Iryna Gurevych. 2021. Augmented SBERT: Data augmentation method for improving bi-encoders for pairwise sentence scoring tasks. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies.
- Felix Virgo, Fei Cheng, and Sadao Kurohashi. 2022. Im- proving event duration question answering by lever- aging existing temporal information extraction data. In Proceedings of the Language Resources and Eval- uation Conference.
- Peng Wang, Ningyu Zhang, Bozhong Tian, Zekun Xi, Yunzhi Yao, Ziwen Xu, Mengru Wang, Shengyu Mao, Xiaohan Wang, Siyuan Cheng, Kangwei Liu, Yuan- sheng Ni, Guozhou Zheng, and Huajun Chen. 2024. EasyEdit: An easy-to-use knowledge editing frame- work for large language models. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics (Volume 3: System Demonstra- tions).
- Yuqing Wang and Yun Zhao. 2024. TRAM: Benchmark- ing temporal reasoning for large language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics: ACL 2024.
- Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, brian ichter, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, and Denny Zhou. 2022. Chain-of-thought prompt- ing elicits reasoning in large language models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
From Storage to Experience: A Survey on the Evolution of LLM Agent Memory Mechanisms
Luo, J., Tian, Y., Cao, C., Luo, Z., Lin, H., Li, K., Kong, C., Yang, R., & Ma, J. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026 · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.2069 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Siyue, Z., Yuxiang, X., Yiming, Z., Xiaobao, W., Tuan, L. A., & Chen, Z.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- ORCID
- Tuan, Luu Anh
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2412.15540
- OpenAlex
- W4405714824
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- temporal reasoning, retrieval-augmented generation, temporal perturbation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review