PreprintCited by 21Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeural dynamics and brain function

Key-value memory in the brain

Open access
Gershman, Samuel J., Fiete, Ila, Irie, Kazuki·2025·arXiv

Abstract

Classical models of memory in psychology and neuroscience rely on similarity-based retrieval of stored patterns, where similarity is a function of retrieval cues and the stored patterns. While parsimonious, these models do not allow distinct representations for storage and retrieval, despite their distinct computational demands. Key-value memory systems, in contrast, distinguish representations used for storage (values) and those used for retrieval (keys). This allows key-value memory systems to optimize simultaneously for fidelity in storage and discriminability in retrieval. We review the computational foundations of key-value memory, its role in modern machine learning systems, related ideas from psychology and neuroscience, applications to a number of empirical puzzles, and possible biological implementations.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2501.02950

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human memory types and working mechanisms can inspire the development of more scientific and reasonable memory-enhanced AI systems.

    “The different types of human memory and their working mechanisms can greatly inspire us to develop more scientific and reasonable memory-enhanced AI systems [13-16].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gershman, S. J., Fiete, I., & Irie, K.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
Corresponding author
Gershman, Samuel J.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
Volume
113
Issue
11
Pages
1694-1707.e1
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408896211
Cited by
21
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 7
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (W911NF-23-1-0277)
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-23-1-0277, W911NF)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
key-value memory, memory retrieval, similarity search, memory fidelity, memory models
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Animals, Brain, Humans, Memory, Models, Neurological, Mental Recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review