Tarsier2: Advancing Large Vision-Language Models from Detailed Video Description to Comprehensive Video Understanding
Open accessAbstract
We introduce Tarsier2, a state-of-the-art large vision-language model (LVLM) designed for generating detailed and accurate video descriptions, while also exhibiting superior general video understanding capabilities. Tarsier2 achieves significant advancements through three key upgrades: (1) Scaling pre-training data from 11M to 40M video-text pairs, enriching both volume and diversity; (2) Performing fine-grained temporal alignment during supervised fine-tuning; (3) Using model-based sampling to automatically construct preference data and applying DPO training for optimization. Extensive experiments show that Tarsier2-7B consistently outperforms leading proprietary models, including GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro, in detailed video description tasks. On the DREAM-1K benchmark, Tarsier2-7B improves F1 by 2.8% over GPT-4o and 5.8% over Gemini-1.5-Pro. In human side-by-side evaluations, Tarsier2-7B shows a +8.6% performance advantage over GPT-4o and +24.9% over Gemini-1.5-Pro. Tarsier2-7B also sets new state-of-the-art results across 15 public benchmarks, spanning tasks such as video question-answering, video grounding, hallucination test, and embodied question-answering, demonstrating its versatility as a robust generalist vision-language model.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A video encoder pre-trained without language supervision can be aligned with a language model and achieve state-of-the-art performance.
“In particular, we show that a video encoder pre-trained without language supervision can be aligned with a language model and achieve state-of-the-art performance, contrary to conventional wisdom (Yuan et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2024b).”
From V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planning (2025) · cites this paper as Yuan et al., 2025
Cited by
Sorted by citations
V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planning
Assran, M., Bardes, A., Fan, D., Garrido, Q., Howes, R., Mojtaba, Komeili, Muckley, M., Rizvi, A., Roberts, C., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.09985 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“…since we only change the vision encoder, we provide evidence that a video encoder trained without language supervision can outperform encoders trained with language supervision, in contrast to conventional wisdom (Tong et al., 2024; Li et al., 2024b; Liu et al., 2024d; Yuan et al., 2025).”
Seeing, Listening, Remembering, and Reasoning: A Multimodal Agent with Long-Term Memory
Long, L., He, Y., Ye, W., Pan, Y., Lin, Y., Li, H., Zhao, J., & Li, W. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.09736 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“With the rapid advancement of large multimodal and language models [1, 15, 41, 51, 53], the Socratic Models framework [26, 54, 55] has emerged as a promising approach for online video understanding.”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Yuan, L., Wang, J., Sun, H., Zhang, Y., & Lin, Y.
- Affiliations
- ByteDance (China) (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2501.07888
- OpenAlex
- W4406449463
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Keywords
- large vision-language models, video description generation, video understanding, temporal alignment, model-based sampling, video question answering, video grounding, hallucination detection, embodied question answering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review