The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ComplexFuncBench: Exploring Multi-Step and Constrained Function Calling under Long-Context Scenario
Abstract
Enhancing large language models (LLMs) with real-time APIs can help generate more accurate and up-to-date responses. However, evaluating the function calling abilities of LLMs in real-world scenarios remains under-explored due to the complexity of data collection and evaluation. In this work, we introduce ComplexFuncBench, a benchmark for complex function calling across five real-world scenarios. Compared to existing benchmarks, ComplexFuncBench encompasses multi-step and constrained function calling, which requires long-parameter filing, parameter value reasoning, and 128k long context. Additionally, we propose an automatic framework, ComplexEval, for quantitatively evaluating complex function calling tasks. Through comprehensive experiments, we demonstrate the deficiencies of state-of-the-art LLMs in function calling and suggest future directions for optimizing these capabilities. The data and code are available at \url{https://github.com/THUDM/ComplexFuncBench}.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ComplexFuncBench was designed to assess scenarios requiring implicit parameter inference, adherence to user-defined constraints, and efficient long-context processing.
“ComplexFuncBench (Zhong et al., 2025) was specifically designed to assess scenarios requiring implicit parameter inference, adherence to user-defined constraints, and efficient long-context processing.”
From Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents (2025) · cites this paper as Zhong et al., 2025
Citations
Cites
C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddings
Xiao, S., Liu, Z., Zhang, P., Muennighoff, N., Lian, D., & Nie, J.-Y. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07597 · Cited by 514
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents
Yehudai, A., Eden, L., Li, A., Uziel, G., Zhao, Y., Bar-Haim, R., Cohan, A., & Shmueli-Scheuer, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16416 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhong, L., Du, Z., Zhang, X., Hu, H., & Tang, J.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- arXiv
- 2501.10132
- References
- 1
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review