VideoJAM: Joint Appearance-Motion Representations for Enhanced Motion Generation in Video Models
Open accessAbstract
Despite tremendous recent progress, generative video models still struggle to capture real-world motion, dynamics, and physics. We show that this limitation arises from the conventional pixel reconstruction objective, which biases models toward appearance fidelity at the expense of motion coherence. To address this, we introduce VideoJAM, a novel framework that instills an effective motion prior to video generators, by encouraging the model to learn a joint appearance-motion representation. VideoJAM is composed of two complementary units. During training, we extend the objective to predict both the generated pixels and their corresponding motion from a single learned representation. During inference, we introduce Inner-Guidance, a mechanism that steers the generation toward coherent motion by leveraging the model's own evolving motion prediction as a dynamic guidance signal. Notably, our framework can be applied to any video model with minimal adaptations, requiring no modifications to the training data or scaling of the model. VideoJAM achieves state-of-the-art performance in motion coherence, surpassing highly competitive proprietary models while also enhancing the perceived visual quality of the generations. These findings emphasize that appearance and motion can be complementary and, when effectively integrated, enhance both the visual quality and the coherence of video generation. Project website: https://hila-chefer.github.io/videojam-paper.github.io/
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing video foundation models such as SoRA, Pika, Luma, Hailuo, and Kling primarily generate characters with limited speech capabilities, simplified mouth movements, and emotional expressions detached from meaningful dialogue, lacking control over spoken content.
“Despite significant advancements in visually compelling content and dynamic environments, models such as SoRA, Pika, Luma, Hailuo, and Kling [2, 3, 5-7, 19, 27, 42] primarily generate characters with limited speech capabilities. Typically, these models exhibit simplified mouth movements and emotional expressions detached from meaningful dialogue, lacking control over actual spoken content.”
From MoCha: Towards Movie-Grade Talking Character Synthesis (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MoCha: Towards Movie-Grade Talking Character Synthesis
Wei, C., Sun, B., Ma, H., Hou, J., Juefei-Xu, F., He, Z., Dai, X., Zhang, L., Li, K., Hou, T., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.23307
“Despite significant advancements in visually compelling content and dynamic environments, models such as SoRA, Pika, Luma, Hailuo, and Kling [2, 3, 5–7, 19, 27, 42] primarily generate characters with limited speech capabilities.”
- Authors
- Chefer, H., Singer, U., Zohar, A., Kirstain, Y., Polyak, A., Taigman, Y., Wolf, L., & Sheynin, S.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2502.02492
- OpenAlex
- W4407186796
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- generative video models, motion coherence, motion priors, motion prediction, video generation, visual quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review