CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 3Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsMulti-Agent Systems and NegotiationArtificial Intelligence in Games

LLM-Powered Decentralized Generative Agents with Adaptive Hierarchical Knowledge Graph for Cooperative Planning

Open access
Yang, Hanqing, Chen, Jingdi, Siew, Marie, Lorido-Botran, Tania, Joe-Wong, Carlee·2025·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2502.05453arXiv 2502.05453
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Developing intelligent agents for long-term cooperation in dynamic open-world scenarios is a major challenge in multi-agent systems. Traditional Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) frameworks like centralized training decentralized execution (CTDE) struggle with scalability and flexibility. They require centralized long-term planning, which is difficult without custom reward functions, and face challenges in processing multi-modal data. CTDE approaches also assume fixed cooperation strategies, making them impractical in dynamic environments where agents need to adapt and plan independently. To address decentralized multi-agent cooperation, we propose Decentralized Adaptive Knowledge Graph Memory and Structured Communication System (DAMCS) in a novel Multi-agent Crafter environment. Our generative agents, powered by Large Language Models (LLMs), are more scalable than traditional MARL agents by leveraging external knowledge and language for long-term planning and reasoning. Instead of fully sharing information from all past experiences, DAMCS introduces a multi-modal memory system organized as a hierarchical knowledge graph and a structured communication protocol to optimize agent cooperation. This allows agents to reason from past interactions and share relevant information efficiently. Experiments on novel multi-agent open-world tasks show that DAMCS outperforms both MARL and LLM baselines in task efficiency and collaboration. Compared to single-agent scenarios, the two-agent scenario achieves the same goal with 63% fewer steps, and the six-agent scenario with 74% fewer steps, highlighting the importance of adaptive memory and structured communication in achieving long-term goals. We publicly release our project at: https://happyeureka.github.io/damcs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2502.05453

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DAMCS enables decentralized cooperation through hierarchical knowledge graphs, dynamic team formation, and structured communication.

    “DAMCS enables decentralized cooperation through hierarchical knowledge graphs, dynamic team formation, and structured communication, allowing agents to learn from each other's experiences and adapt to new environments via most relevant information, while keep their own individual memories.”

    From The AI Hippocampus: How Far are We From Human Memory? (2026) · cites this paper as Yang et al., 2025

    The Conclusion (Section 7) describes DAMCS as a decentralized framework using a hierarchical knowledge graph and structured communication to improve cooperation. It reports dynamic role assignment, but not dynamic team formation; the agents adjust their tasks rather than form or re-form teams. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Achiam, J.; Adler, S.; Agarwal, S.; Ahmad, L.; Akkaya, I.; Aleman, F. L.; Almeida, D.; Altenschmidt, J.; Altman, S.; Anadkat, S.; et al. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774. Ahn, M.; Brohan, A.; Brown, N.; Chebotar, Y.; Cortes, O.; David, B.; Finn, C.; Fu, C.; Gopalakrishnan, K.; Hausman, K.; et al. 2022. Do as i can, not as i say: Grounding language in robotic affordances. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.01691. Baltrušaitis, T.; Ahuja, C.; and Morency, L.-P. 2018. Mul- timodal machine learning: A survey and taxonomy. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 41(2): 423–443. Berner, C.; Brockman, G.; Chan, B.; Cheung, V.; Dębiak, P.; Dennison, C.; Farhi, D.; Fischer, Q.; Hashme, S.; Hesse, C.; et al. 2019. Dota 2 with large scale deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.06680. Bernstein, D. S.; Givan, R.; Immerman, N.; and Zilberstein, S. 2002. The complexity of decentralized control of Markov decision processes. Mathematics of operations research, 27(4): 819–840. Bettini, M.; Prorok, A.; and Moens, V. 2024. Bench- MARL: Benchmarking Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learn- ing. arXiv:2312.01472. Brodeur, S.; Perez, E.; Anand, A.; Golemo, F.; Celotti, L.; Strub, F.; Rouat, J.; Larochelle, H.; and Courville, A. 2017. Home: A household multimodal environment. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.11017. Brown, T. B. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165. Bubeck, S.; Chandrasekaran, V.; Eldan, R.; Gehrke, J.; Horvitz, E.; Kamar, E.; Lee, P.; Lee, Y. T.; Li, Y.; Lundberg, S.; et al. 2023. Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12712. Cao, Y.; Yu, W.; Ren, W.; and Chen, G. 2013. An Overview of Recent Progress in the Study of Distributed Multi-Agent Coordination. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 9(1): 427–438. Chen, J.; Lan, T.; and Choi, N. 2023. Distributional-Utility Actor-Critic for Network Slice Performance Guarantee. In Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth International Symposium on Theory, Algorithmic Foundations, and Protocol Design for Mobile Networks and Mobile Computing, 161–170. Chen, J.; Lan, T.; and Joe-Wong, C. 2024. RGMComm: Return Gap Minimization via Discrete Communications in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, 17327–17336. Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; and Lan, T. 2021. Bringing fairness to actor-critic reinforcement learning for network utility opti- mization. In IEEE INFOCOM 2021-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, 1–10. IEEE. Chen, J.; Zhang, L.; Riem, J.; Adam, G.; Bastian, N. D.; and Lan, T. 2023a. Explainable Learning-Based Intrusion De- tection Supported by Memristors. In 2023 IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI), 195–196. IEEE. · arXiv
  2. Chen, J.; Zhang, L.; Riem, J.; Adam, G.; Bastian, N. D.; and Lan, T. 2023b. RIDE: Real-time Intrusion Detection via Explainable Machine Learning Implemented in a Memristor Hardware Architecture. In 2023 IEEE Conference on De- pendable and Secure Computing (DSC), 1–8. IEEE. Chen, J.; Zhou, H.; Mei, Y.; Adam, G.; Bastian, N. D.; and Lan, T. 2023c. Real-time Network Intrusion Detection via Decision Transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.07696. Chen, J.; Zhou, H.; Mei, Y.; Joe-Wong, C.; Adam, G.; Bas- tian, N. D.; and Lan, T. 2024. RGMDT: Return-Gap- Minimizing Decision Tree Extraction in Non-Euclidean Metric Space. In The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Du, Y.; Li, S.; Torralba, A.; Tenenbaum, J. B.; and Mor- datch, I. 2023. Improving factuality and reasoning in lan- guage models through multiagent debate. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14325. Edge, D.; Trinh, H.; Cheng, N.; Bradley, J.; Chao, A.; Mody, A.; Truitt, S.; and Larson, J. 2024. From local to global: A graph rag approach to query-focused summarization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16130. Fan, L.; Wang, G.; Jiang, Y.; Mandlekar, A.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Tang, A.; Huang, D.-A.; Zhu, Y.; and Anandkumar, A. 2022. Minedojo: Building open-ended embodied agents with internet-scale knowledge. Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, 35: 18343–18362. Foerster, J. N.; Assael, Y. M.; de Freitas, N.; and Whiteson, S. 2016. Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. Freed, B.; James, R.; Sartoretti, G.; and Choset, H. 2020. Sparse discrete communication learning for multi-agent co- operation through backpropagation. In 2020 IEEE/RSJ In- ternational Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 7993–7998. IEEE. Gramopadhye, M.; and Szafir, D. 2023. Generating exe- cutable action plans with environmentally-aware language models. In 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on In- telligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 3568–3575. IEEE. Guo, T.; Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Chang, R.; Pei, S.; Chawla, N.; Wiest, O.; and Zhang, X. 2024. Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges. In 33rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence (IJCAI 2024). IJCAI; Cornell arxiv. Hafner, D. 2021. Benchmarking the spectrum of agent ca- pabilities. In International Conference on Learning Repre- sentations. Hogan, A.; Blomqvist, E.; Cochez, M.; d'Amato, C.; Melo, G. D.; Gutierrez, C.; Kirrane, S.; Gayo, J. E. L.; Navigli, R.; Neumaier, S.; et al. 2021. Knowledge graphs. ACM Computing Surveys (Csur), 54(4): 1–37. Huang, W.; Abbeel, P.; Pathak, D.; and Mordatch, I. 2022. Language models as zero-shot planners: Extracting action- able knowledge for embodied agents. In International con- ference on machine learning, 9118–9147. PMLR. Huh, D.; and Mohapatra, P. 2023. Multi-agent reinforce- ment learning: A comprehensive survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10256. · arXiv
  3. Ji, S.; Pan, S.; Cambria, E.; Marttinen, P.; and Philip, S. Y. 2021. A survey on knowledge graphs: Representation, ac- quisition, and applications. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 33(2): 494–514. Jiang, J.; and Lu, Z. 2018. Learning Attentional Communi- cation for Multi-Agent Cooperation. Kolve, E.; Mottaghi, R.; Han, W.; VanderBilt, E.; Weihs, L.; Herrasti, A.; Deitke, M.; Ehsani, K.; Gordon, D.; Zhu, Y.; et al. 2017. Ai2-thor: An interactive 3d environment for vi- sual ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05474. Lazaridou, A.; and Baroni, M. 2020. Emergent multi-agent communication in the deep learning era. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.02419. Li, C.; Zhang, R.; Wong, J.; Gokmen, C.; Srivastava, S.; Martín-Martín, R.; Wang, C.; Levine, G.; Lingelbach, M.; Sun, J.; et al. 2023a. Behavior-1k: A benchmark for embod- ied ai with 1,000 everyday activities and realistic simulation. In Conference on Robot Learning, 80–93. PMLR. Li, G.; Hammoud, H.; Itani, H.; Khizbullin, D.; and Ghanem, B. 2023b. Camel: Communicative agents for" mind" exploration of large language model society. Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36: 51991–52008. Li, L.; Martinoli, A.; and Abu-Mostafa, Y. S. 2002. Emer- gent Specialization in Swarm Systems. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Data En- gineering and Automated Learning, IDEAL '02, 261–266. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 3540440259. Li, P.; Tang, H.; Yang, T.; Hao, X.; Sang, T.; Zheng, Y.; Hao, J.; Taylor, M. E.; and Wang, Z. 2022a. PMIC: Im- proving Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Progres- sive Mutual Information Collaboration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.08553. Li, S.; Puig, X.; Paxton, C.; Du, Y.; Wang, C.; Fan, L.; Chen, T.; Huang, D.-A.; Akyürek, E.; Anandkumar, A.; et al. 2022b. Pre-trained language models for interactive decision- making. Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems, 35: 31199–31212. Li, S.; Zhou, Y.; Allen, R.; and Kochenderfer, M. J. 2022c. Learning Emergent Discrete Message Communication for Cooperative Reinforcement Learning. In 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 5511– 5517. Li, Z.; Xie, Y.; Shao, R.; Chen, G.; Jiang, D.; and Nie, L. 2024. Optimus-1: Hybrid Multimodal Memory Empow- ered Agents Excel in Long-Horizon Tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03615. Liang, P.; Bommasani, R.; Lee, T.; Tsipras, D.; Soylu, D.; Yasunaga, M.; Zhang, Y.; Narayanan, D.; Wu, Y.; Kumar, A.; et al. 2022. Holistic Evaluation of Language Models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research. Lowe, R.; Wu, Y.; Tamar, A.; Harb, J.; Abbeel, P.; and Mordatch, I. 2017. Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environments. Matthews, M.; Beukman, M.; Ellis, B.; Samvelyan, M.; Jackson, M.; Coward, S.; and Foerster, J. 2024. Craftax: A · arXiv
  4. Lightning-Fast Benchmark for Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning. arXiv:2402.16801. Misra, D.; Bennett, A.; Blukis, V.; Niklasson, E.; Shatkhin, M.; and Artzi, Y. 2018. Mapping instructions to actions in 3d environments with visual goal prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.00786. Mordatch, I.; and Abbeel, P. 2017. Emergence of Grounded Compositional Language in Multi-Agent Populations. Ngiam, J.; Khosla, A.; Kim, M.; Nam, J.; Lee, H.; Ng, A. Y.; et al. 2011. Multimodal deep learning. In ICML, volume 11, 689–696. Padmakumar, A.; Thomason, J.; Shrivastava, A.; Lange, P.; Narayan-Chen, A.; Gella, S.; Piramuthu, R.; Tur, G.; and Hakkani-Tur, D. 2022. Teach: Task-driven embodied agents that chat. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artifi- cial Intelligence, volume 36, 2017–2025. Pallagani, V.; Muppasani, B.; Murugesan, K.; Rossi, F.; Horesh, L.; Srivastava, B.; Fabiano, F.; and Loreggia, A. 2022. Plansformer: Generating symbolic plans using trans- formers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08681. Park, J. S.; O'Brien, J.; Cai, C. J.; Morris, M. R.; Liang, P.; and Bernstein, M. S. 2023. Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. In Proceedings of the 36th annual acm symposium on user interface software and tech- nology, 1–22. Pipattanasomporn, M.; Feroze, H.; and Rahman, S. 2009. Multi-agent systems in a distributed smart grid: Design and implementation. In 2009 IEEE/PES Power Systems Confer- ence and Exposition, 1–8. Pokrass, M.; Colby, C.; Guan, M.; Sanders, T.; and Zhang, B. 2023. Introducing Structured Outputs in the API. https://openai.com/index/introducing-structured- outputs-in-the-api/. Core contributors: Chris Colby, Melody Guan, Michelle Pokrass, Ted Sanders, Brian Zhang. Ac- knowledgments: John Allard, Filipe de Avila Belbute Peres, Ilan Bigio, Owen Campbell-Moore, Chen Ding, Atty Eleti, Elie Georges, Katia Gil Guzman, Jeff Harris, Johannes Hei- decke, Beth Hoover, Romain Huet, Tomer Kaftan, Jillian Khoo, Karolis Kosas, Ryan Liu, Kevin Lu, Lindsay McCal- lum, Rohan Nuttall, Joe Palermo, Leher Pathak, Ishaan Sin- gal, Felipe Petroski Such, Freddie Sulit, David Weedon. Raman, S. S.; Cohen, V.; Idrees, I.; Rosen, E.; Mooney, R.; Tellex, S.; and Paulius, D. 2024. Cape: Corrective actions from precondition errors using large language models. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Au- tomation (ICRA), 14070–14077. IEEE. Rangwala, M.; and Williams, R. 2020. Learning Multi- Agent Communication through Structured Attentive Rea- soning. In Proceedings of the 34th International Confer- ence on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS'20. Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc. ISBN 9781713829546. Samvelyan, M.; Rashid, T.; de Witt, C. S.; Farquhar, G.; Nardelli, N.; Rudner, T. G. J.; Hung, C.-M.; Torr, P. H. S.; Foerster, J.; and Whiteson, S. 2019. The StarCraft Multi- Agent Challenge. arXiv:1902.04043. · arXiv
  5. Savva, M.; Kadian, A.; Maksymets, O.; Zhao, Y.; Wijmans, E.; Jain, B.; Straub, J.; Liu, J.; Koltun, V.; Malik, J.; et al. 2019. Habitat: A platform for embodied ai research. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 9339–9347. Sharma, P.; Torralba, A.; and Andreas, J. 2021. Skill in- duction and planning with latent language. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.01517. Shinn, N.; Cassano, F.; Gopinath, A.; Narasimhan, K.; and Yao, S. 2024. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal re- inforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, 36. Shridhar, M.; Thomason, J.; Gordon, D.; Bisk, Y.; Han, W.; Mottaghi, R.; Zettlemoyer, L.; and Fox, D. 2020. Alfred: A benchmark for interpreting grounded instructions for every- day tasks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 10740–10749. Song, C. H.; Wu, J.; Washington, C.; Sadler, B. M.; Chao, W.-L.; and Su, Y. 2023. Llm-planner: Few-shot grounded planning for embodied agents with large language models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2998–3009. Sukhbaatar, S.; Szlam, A.; and Fergus, R. 2016. Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagation. Sumers, T. R.; Yao, S.; Narasimhan, K.; and Griffiths, T. L. 2023. Cognitive architectures for language agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.02427. Terry, J.; Black, B.; Grammel, N.; Jayakumar, M.; Hari, A.; Sullivan, R.; Santos, L. S.; Dieffendahl, C.; Horsch, C.; Perez-Vicente, R.; et al. 2021. Pettingzoo: Gym for multi- agent reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems, 34: 15032–15043. Touvron, H.; Martin, L.; Stone, K.; Albert, P.; Almahairi, A.; Babaei, Y.; Bashlykov, N.; Batra, S.; Bhargava, P.; Bhosale, S.; et al. 2023. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288. Tucker, M.; Levy, R.; Shah, J. A.; and Zaslavsky, N. 2022. Trading off utility, informativeness, and complexity in emer- gent communication. Advances in neural information pro- cessing systems, 35: 22214–22228. Tucker, M.; Li, H.; Agrawal, S.; Hughes, D.; Sycara, K.; Lewis, M.; and Shah, J. A. 2021. Emergent discrete com- munication in semantic spaces. Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, 34: 10574–10586. Vinyals, O.; Babuschkin, I.; Czarnecki, W. M.; Mathieu, M.; Dudzik, A.; Chung, J.; Choi, D. H.; Powell, R.; Ewalds, T.; Georgiev, P.; et al. 2019. Grandmaster level in Star- Craft II using multi-agent reinforcement learning. nature, 575(7782): 350–354. Wang, G.; Xie, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Mandlekar, A.; Xiao, C.; Zhu, Y.; Fan, L.; and Anandkumar, A. 2023a. Voyager: An open- ended embodied agent with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16291. Wang, L.; Ma, C.; Feng, X.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, H.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Z.; Tang, J.; Chen, X.; Lin, Y.; et al. 2024. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. Frontiers of Computer Science, 18(6): 186345. · arXiv
  6. Wang, T.; Wang, J.; Zheng, C.; and Zhang, C. 2019. Learn- ing nearly decomposable value functions via communica- tion minimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.05366. Wang, Z.; Cai, S.; Chen, G.; Liu, A.; Ma, X.; and Liang, Y. 2023b. Describe, explain, plan and select: Interactive plan- ning with large language models enables open-world multi- task agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.01560. Wang, Z.; Mao, S.; Wu, W.; Ge, T.; Wei, F.; and Ji, H. 2023c. Unleashing the emergent cognitive synergy in large lan- guage models: A task-solving agent through multi-persona self-collaboration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.05300. Warner, B. C.; Xu, Z.; Haroutounian, S.; Kannampallil, T.; and Lu, C. 2023. Utilizing Semantic Textual Similarity for Clinical Survey Data Feature Selection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.09892. Wu, Y.; Min, S. Y.; Prabhumoye, S.; Bisk, Y.; Salakhutdinov, R. R.; Azaria, A.; Mitchell, T. M.; and Li, Y. 2024. Spring: Studying papers and reasoning to play games. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36. Xi, Z.; Chen, W.; Guo, X.; He, W.; Ding, Y.; Hong, B.; Zhang, M.; Wang, J.; Jin, S.; Zhou, E.; et al. 2023. The rise and potential of large language model based agents: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.07864. Xia, F.; Zamir, A. R.; He, Z.; Sax, A.; Malik, J.; and Savarese, S. 2018. Gibson env: Real-world perception for embodied agents. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 9068–9079. Xu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Greenberg, J.; Frumkin, M.; Javeed, S.; Zhang, J. K.; Benedict, B.; Botterbush, K.; Rode- baugh, T. L.; Ray, W. Z.; et al. 2024. Predicting Multi- dimensional Surgical Outcomes with Multi-modal Mobile Sensing: A Case Study with Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mo- bile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 8(2): 1–30. Yang, H.; Siew, M.; and Joe-Wong, C. 2024. An LLM- based digital twin for optimizing human-in-the loop sys- tems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16809. Yang, S.; Nachum, O.; Du, Y.; Wei, J.; Abbeel, P.; and Schu- urmans, D. 2023. Foundation models for decision mak- ing: Problems, methods, and opportunities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04129. Yuan, S.; Chen, J.; Fu, Z.; Ge, X.; Shah, S.; Jankowski, C. R.; Xiao, Y.; and Yang, D. 2023. Distilling script knowl- edge from large language models for constrained language planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.05252. Zhang, H.; Du, W.; Shan, J.; Zhou, Q.; Du, Y.; Tenenbaum, J. B.; Shu, T.; and Gan, C. 2023. Building Cooperative Em- bodied Agents Modularly with Large Language Models. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Repre- sentations. Zhu, Y.; Gordon, D.; Kolve, E.; Fox, D.; Fei-Fei, L.; Gupta, A.; Mottaghi, R.; and Farhadi, A. 2017. Visual semantic planning using deep successor representations. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE international conference on computer vi- sion, 483–492. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, H., Chen, J., Siew, M., Lorido-Botran, T., & Joe-Wong, C.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2502.05453
arXiv
2502.05453
OpenAlex
W4407384862
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
Keywords
multi-agent systems, large language models, decentralized agents, hierarchical knowledge graph, long-term planning, collaborative planning, agent cooperation, scalability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review