CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 71Artificial Intelligence in EducationVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Protecting Human Cognition in the Age of AI

Open access
Singh, Anjali, Taneja, Karan, Guan, Zhitong, Ghosh, Avijit·2025·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2502.12447arXiv 2502.12447
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The rapid adoption of Generative AI (GenAI) is significantly reshaping human cognition, influencing how we engage with information, think, reason, and learn. This paper synthesizes existing literature on GenAI's effects on different aspects of human cognition. Drawing on Krathwohl's revised Bloom's Taxonomy and Dewey's conceptualization of reflective thought, we examine the mechanisms through which GenAI is affecting the development of different cognitive abilities. We focus on novices, such as students, who may lack both domain knowledge and an understanding of effective human-AI interaction. Accordingly, we provide implications for rethinking and designing educational experiences that foster critical thinking and deeper cognitive engagement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2502.12447

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. [1][1] Ahmad, S. F., Han, H., Alam, M. M., Rehmat, M., Irshad, M., Arraño-Muñoz, M., Ariza-Montes, A., et al. Impact of artificial intelligence on human loss in decision making, laziness and safety in education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10 , 1 (2023), 1-14. -
  2. [2][2] Al Naqbi, H., Bahroun, Z., and Ahmed, V. Enhancing work productivity through generative artificial intelligence: A comprehensive literature review. Sustainability 16 , 3 (2024), 1166. -
  3. [3][3] Ali Elfa, M. A., and Dawood, M. E. T. Using artificial intelligence for enhancing human creativity. Journal of Art, Design and Music 2 , 2 (2023), 3. -
  4. [4][4] Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., and Eyre, R. N. Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of experimental psychology: General 136 , 4 (2007), 569. -
  5. [5][5] Anderson, R., and Pearson, P. A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. -
  6. [6][6] Bannert, M., and Mengelkamp, C. Scaffolding hypermedia learning through metacognitive prompts. In International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies . Springer, 2013, pp. 171-186. -
  7. [7][7] Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakci, O., and Mariman, R. Generative ai can harm learning. Available at SSRN 4895486 (2024). -
  8. [8][8] Beghetto, R. A. A new horizon for possibility thinking: A conceptual case study of human × ai collaboration. Possibility Studies & Society 1 , 3 (2023), 324-341. -
  9. [9][9] Brown, C., Kaur, S., Kingdon, G., and Schofield, H. Cognitive endurance as human capital. The Quarterly Journal of Economics (2024), qjae043. -
  10. [12][12] Chen, Y., Li, M., Guo, F., and Wang, X. The effect of short-form video addiction on users' attention. Behaviour & Information Technology 42 , 16 (2023), 2893-2910. -
  11. [13][13] Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., and Starnini, M. The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 , 9 (2021), e2023301118. -
  12. [14][14] Danry, V., Pataranutaporn, P., Groh, M., Epstein, Z., and Maes, P. Deceptive ai systems that give explanations are more convincing than honest ai systems and can amplify belief in misinformation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00024 (2024). - · arXiv
  13. [15][15] Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., Gašević, D., and Siemens, G. Impact of ai assistance on student agency. Computers & Education 210 (2024), 104967. -
  14. [16][16] Derry, S. J. Cognitive schema theory in the constructivist debate. Educational psychologist 31 , 3-4 (1996), 163-174. -
  15. [19][19] Drigas, A. S., and Pappas, M. A. The consciousness-intelligence-knowledge pyramid: an 8x8 layer model. International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering, Science & IT (iJES) 5 , 3 (2017), 14-25. -
  16. [20][20] Drosos, I., Sarkar, A., Toronto, N., et al. " it makes you think": Provocations help restore critical thinking to ai-assisted knowledge work. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17247 (2025). - · arXiv
  17. [21][21] Ericsson, K. A., et al. The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance 38 , 685-705 (2006), 2-2. -
  18. [22][22] Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, Y., Li, X., and Gašević, D. Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology (2024). -
  19. [23][23] Federiakin, D., Molerov, D., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., and Maur, A. Prompt engineering as a new 21st century skill. In Frontiers in Education (2024), vol. 9, Frontiers Media SA, p. 1366434. -
  20. [24][24] Gajos, K. Z., and Mamykina, L. Do people engage cognitively with ai? impact of ai assistance on incidental learning. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (2022), pp. 794-806. -
  21. [26][26] Gong, C., and Yang, Y. Google effects on memory: a meta-analytical review of the media effects of intensive internet search behavior. Frontiers in Public Health 12 (2024), 1332030. -
  22. [28][28] Imundo, M. N., Watanabe, M., Potter, A. H., Gong, J., Arner, T., and McNamara, D. S. Expert thinking with generative chatbots. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (2024). -
  23. [29][29] Irons, A., and Elkington, S. Enhancing learning through formative assessment 30. and feedback . Routledge, 2021. -
  24. [30][30] Kapur, M. Productive Failure. Cognition and Instruction 26 , 3 (2008), 379-424. -
  25. [31][31] Kazemitabaar, M., Hou, X., Henley, A., Ericson, B. J., Weintrop, D., and Grossman, T. How novices use llm-based code generators to solve cs1 coding tasks in a self-paced learning environment. In Proceedings of the 23rd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (2023), pp. 1-12. -
  26. [32][32] Kazemitabaar, M., Huang, O., Suh, S., Henley, A. Z., and Grossman, T. Exploring the design space of cognitive engagement techniques with ai-generated code for enhanced learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08922 (2024). - · arXiv
  27. [33][33] Kidd, C., and Birhane, A. How ai can distort human beliefs. Science 380 , 6651 (2023), 1222-1223. -
  28. [34][34] Klingbeil, A., Grützner, C., and Schreck, P. Trust and reliance on ai-an experimental study on the extent and costs of overreliance on ai. Computers in Human Behavior 160 (2024), 108352. -
  29. [36][36] Kumar, H., Vincentius, J., Jordan, E., and Anderson, A. Human creativity in the age of llms: Randomized experiments on divergent and convergent thinking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.03703 (2024). - · arXiv
  30. [38][38] Lehmann, M., Cornelius, P. B., and Sting, F. J. Ai meets the classroom: When does chatgpt harm learning? arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.09047 (2024). - · arXiv
  31. [39][39] Lin, X., and Lehman, J. D. Supporting learning of variable control in a computerbased biology environment: Effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 36 , 7 (1999), 837-858. -
  32. [40][40] Margulieux, L. E., Prather, J., Reeves, B. N., Becker, B. A., Cetin Uzun, G., Loksa, D., Leinonen, J., and Denny, P. Self-regulation, self-efficacy, and fear of failure interactions with how novices use llms to solve programming problems. In Proceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1 . 2024, pp. 276-282. -
  33. [43][43] Meylani, R. Innovations with schema theory: Modern implications for learning, memory, and academic achievement. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research 6 (02 2024). -
  34. [45][45] Niloy, A. C., Akter, S., Sultana, N., Sultana, J., and Rahman, S. I. U. Is chatgpt a menace for creative writing ability? an experiment. Journal of computer assisted learning 40 , 2 (2024), 919-930. -
  35. [46][46] Oates, A., and Johnson, D. Chatgpt in the classroom: Evaluating its role in fostering critical evaluation skills. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (2025), 1-32. -
  36. [47][47] Pankiewicz, M., and Baker, R. S. Large language models (gpt) for automating feedback on programming assignments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.00150 (2023). - · arXiv
  37. [49][49] Peschl, M. F. Human innovation and the creative agency of the world in the age of generative ai. Possibility Studies & Society 2 , 1 (2024), 49-76. -
  38. [50][50] Pham, M. T. Emotion and rationality: A critical review and interpretation of empirical evidence. Review of general psychology 11 , 2 (2007), 155-178. -
  39. [51][51] Prather, J., Reeves, B., Leinonen, J., Macneil, S., Randrianasolo, A., Becker, B., Kimmel, B., Wright, J., and Briggs, B. The widening gap: The benefits and harms of generative ai for novice programmers. pp. 469-486. -
  40. [52][52] Ralph, B. C., Thomson, D. R., Cheyne, J. A., and Smilek, D. Media multitasking and failures of attention in everyday life. Psychological research 78 (2014), 661-669. -
  41. [54][54] Risko, E. F., and Gilbert, S. J. Cognitive offloading. Trends in cognitive sciences 20 , 9 (2016), 676-688. -
  42. [56][56] Sarkar, A. Ai should challenge, not obey. Communications of the ACM 67 , 10 (2024), 18-21. -
  43. [57][57] Shah, C., and Bender, E. M. Envisioning information access systems: What makes for good tools and a healthy web? ACM Transactions on the Web 18 , 3 (2024), 1-24. -
  44. [58][58] Sharma, N., Liao, Q. V., and Xiao, Z. Generative Echo Chamber? Effect of LLM-Powered Search Systems on Diverse Information Seeking. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, May 2024), CHI '24, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1-17. -
  45. [60][60] Singh, A. Empowering Data Science Learners through Learnersourcing and StudentAI Collaboration . PhD thesis, 2024. -
  46. [61][61] Singh, A., Brooks, C., Wang, X., Li, W., Kim, J., and Wilson, D. Bridging learnersourcing and ai: Exploring the dynamics of student-ai collaborative feedback generation. In Proceedings of the 14th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (2024), pp. 742-748. -
  47. [62][62] Solaiman, I., Talat, Z., Agnew, W., Ahmad, L., Baker, D., Blodgett, S. L., Chen, C., Daumé III, H., Dodge, J., Duan, I., et al. Evaluating the social impact of generative ai systems in systems and society. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05949 (2023). - · arXiv
  48. [63][63] Song, C., and Song, Y. Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of chatgpt in ai-assisted language learning for efl students. Frontiers in Psychology 14 (2023), 1260843. -
  49. [64][64] Sternberg, R. J. Do not worry that generative ai may compromise human creativity or intelligence in the future: It already has. Journal of Intelligence 12 (2024). -
  50. [65][65] Tankelevitch, L., Kewenig, V., Simkute, A., Scott, A. E., Sarkar, A., Sellen, A., and Rintel, S. The metacognitive demands and opportunities of generative ai. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2024), pp. 1-24. -
  51. [68][68] Venkit, P. N., Laban, P., Zhou, Y., Mao, Y., and Wu, C.-S. Search engines in an ai era: The false promise of factual and verifiable source-cited responses. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.22349 (2024). - · arXiv
  52. [70][70] Winne, P. H. Cognition and metacognition within self-regulated learning. In Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance . Routledge, 2017, pp. 3648. -
  53. [71][71] Winne, P. H. Cognition, metacognition, and self-regulated learning. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education . 2021. -
  54. [72][72] Woods, D. D., Patterson, E. S., and Roth, E. M. Can we ever escape from data overload? a cognitive systems diagnosis. Cognition, Technology & Work 4 (2002), 22-36. -
  55. [73][73] Yan, L., Greiff, S., Teuber, Z., and Gašević, D. Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning. Nature Human Behaviour 8 , 10 (2024), 1839-1850. -
  56. [74][74] Yan, W., Li, J., Mi, C., Wang, W., Xu, Z., Xiong, W., Tang, L., Wang, S., Li, Y., and Wang, S. Does global positioning system-based navigation dependency make your sense of direction poor? a psychological assessment and eye-tracking study. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022), 983019. -
  57. [75][75] Yang, Y.-T. C., Newby, T. J., and Bill, R. L. Using socratic questioning to promote critical thinking skills through asynchronous discussion forums in distance learning environments. The american journal of distance education 19 , 3 (2005), 163-181. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Singh, A., Taneja, K., Guan, Z., & Ghosh, A.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2502.12447
arXiv
2502.12447
OpenAlex
W4407759415
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
generative AI, human cognition, critical thinking, Bloom's taxonomy, reflective thinking, John Dewey, human-AI interaction, students, educational design, cognitive engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review