The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
LightThinker: Thinking Step-by-Step Compression
Open accessAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in complex reasoning tasks, but their efficiency is hindered by the substantial memory and computational costs associated with generating lengthy tokens. In this paper, we propose LightThinker, a novel method that enables LLMs to dynamically compress intermediate thoughts during reasoning. Inspired by human cognitive processes, LightThinker compresses verbose thought steps into compact representations and discards the original reasoning chains, thereby significantly reducing the number of tokens stored in the context window. This is achieved by training the model on when and how to perform compression through data construction, mapping hidden states to condensed gist tokens, and creating specialized attention masks. Additionally, we introduce the Dependency (Dep) metric to quantify the degree of compression by measuring the reliance on historical tokens during generation. Extensive experiments on four datasets and two models show that LightThinker reduces peak memory usage and inference time, while maintaining competitive accuracy. Our work provides a new direction for improving the efficiency of LLMs in complex reasoning tasks without sacrificing performance. Code is released at https://github.com/zjunlp/LightThinker.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LightThinker compresses verbose reasoning into compact gist tokens to reduce memory and computational costs.
“Instead of storing long thought chains, LightThinker compresses verbose reasoning into compact 'gist tokens' to reduce memory and computational costs.”
From Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as [231]
Citations
Cites
Adapting Language Models to Compress Contexts
Chevalier, A., Wettig, A., Ajith, A., & Chen, D. (2023) · arXiv · Cited by 59 · cited 3×
“…acceleration methods specifically targeting the long-text generation phase (e.g., pre-filling stage acceleration techniques such as Au-toCompressor (Chevalier et al., 2023), ICAE (Ge et al., 2024), LLMLingua (Jiang et al., 2023), Activation Beacon (Zhang et al., 2024b), SnapKV (Li et al., 2024),…”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models
Sui, Y., Chuang, Y.-N., Wang, G., Zhang, J., Zhang, T., Yuan, J., Liu, H., Wen, A., Zhong, S., Zou, N., et al. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 517
“…SoftCoT [100]; DynamicReasoningParadigm e.g. Speculative Rejection [81]; Sampling-Efficient TTS [91]; DPTS [26]; Cer-taindex [30]; Fast MCTS [44]; ST-BoN [91]; More is Less [94]; RSD [48]; Light-Thinker [108]; INFTYTHINK [101]; SCoT [96]; RASC [89]; Adaptive Reasoning [106]; AdaptiveStep [54];”
Self-citationKong, Z., Li, Y., Zeng, F., Xin, L., Messica, S., Lin, X., Zhao, P., Kellis, M., Tang, H., & Zitnik, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.18227 · Cited by 51
“For example, approaches based on next-token prediction [101, 180] can distill intermediate thinking chains into a set of dense, information-rich tokens.”
MEM1: Learning to Synergize Memory and Reasoning for Efficient Long-Horizon Agents
Zhou, Z., Qu, A., Wu, Z., Kim, S., Prakash, A., Rus, D., Zhao, J., Low, B. K. H., & Liang, P. P. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.15841 · Cited by 218
“Following [67], the dependency metric is defined as the total number of historical tokens on which each generated token effectively depends.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, J., Zhu, Y., Sun, M., Luo, Y., Qiao, S., Du, L., Zheng, D., Chen, H., & Zhang, N.
- ORCID
- Qiao, Shuofei
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2502.15589
- OpenAlex
- W6929723227
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- large language models, LLM reasoning, token efficiency, attention masks, memory reduction, inference latency reduction, human cognitive processes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review