CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 40Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GTopic Modeling

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Toward Agentic AI: Generative Information Retrieval Inspired Intelligent Communications and Networking

Open access
Zhang, Ruichen, Tang, Shunpu, Liu, Yinqiu, Niyato, Dusit, Xiong, Zehui, Sun, Sumei, Mao, Shiwen, Han, Zhu·2025·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2502.16866arXiv 2502.16866
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The increasing complexity and scale of modern telecommunications networks demand intelligent automation to enhance efficiency, adaptability, and resilience. Agentic AI has emerged as a key paradigm for intelligent communications and networking, enabling AI-driven agents to perceive, reason, decide, and act within dynamic networking environments. However, effective decision-making in telecom applications, such as network planning, management, and resource allocation, requires integrating retrieval mechanisms that support multi-hop reasoning, historical cross-referencing, and compliance with evolving 3GPP standards. This article presents a forward-looking perspective on generative information retrieval-inspired intelligent communications and networking, emphasizing the role of knowledge acquisition, processing, and retrieval in agentic AI for telecom systems. We first provide a comprehensive review of generative information retrieval strategies, including traditional retrieval, hybrid retrieval, semantic retrieval, knowledge-based retrieval, and agentic contextual retrieval. We then analyze their advantages, limitations, and suitability for various networking scenarios. Next, we present a survey about their applications in communications and networking. Additionally, we introduce an agentic contextual retrieval framework to enhance telecom-specific planning by integrating multi-source retrieval, structured reasoning, and self-reflective validation. Experimental results demonstrate that our framework significantly improves answer accuracy, explanation consistency, and retrieval efficiency compared to traditional and semantic retrieval methods. Finally, we outline future research directions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2502.16866

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Agentic AI extends the capabilities of traditional AI Agents by enabling multiple intelligent entities to collaboratively pursue goals through structured communication, shared memory, and dynamic role assignment.

    “This emerging class of systems extends the capabilities of traditional AI Agents by enabling multiple intelligent entities to collaboratively pursue goals through structured communication [144-146], shared memory [147,148], and dynamic role assignment [22].”

    From AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [144]

    The cited paper describes collaboration among agents (Introduction, p. 1) and distinct reasoning, decision-making, and self-reflection agents (Agentic Contextual Retrieval Framework, p. 6). It does not say their roles are dynamically assigned; the dynamic adjustment it describes concerns retrieval strategies (Agentic Contextual Retrieval, p. 3). The other features in the citing sentence have separate citations. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Agentic AI extends the capabilities of traditional AI Agents by enabling multiple intelligent entities to collaboratively pursue goals through structured communication, shared memory, and dynamic role assignment.

    “This emerging class of systems extends the capabilities of traditional AI Agents by enabling multiple intelligent entities to collaboratively pursue goals through structured communication [146]-[148], shared memory [149], [150], and dynamic role assignment [21].”

    From AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [146]

    The citation [21] is attached specifically to “dynamic role assignment.” The Introduction (p. 1) describes collaboration among AI agents, and the Agentic Contextual Retrieval Framework (p. 6) describes agents with distinct decision-making and self-reflection roles. Neither passage says those roles are dynamically assigned. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [1][1] A. Maatouk, N. Piovesan et al. , 'Large language models for telecom: Forthcoming impact on the industry,' IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 62-68, 2025. -
  2. [2][2] S. Sivakumar, 'Agentic AI in predictive AIOps: Enhancing IT autonomy and performance,' IJSRM , vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1631-1638, 2024. -
  3. [3][3] R. Zhang et al. , 'Generative AI agents with large language model for satellite networks via a mixture of experts transmission,' IEEE J. Sel. Area. Comm. , vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 3581-3596, 2024. -
  4. [4][4] K. Dev, S. A. Khowaja, E. Zeydan, and M. Debbah, 'Advanced architectures integrated with agentic AI for next-generation wireless networks,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01089 , 2025. - · arXiv
  5. [5][5] A. Singh et al. , 'Agentic retrieval-augmented generation: A survey on agentic RAG,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09136 , 2025. - · arXiv
  6. [6][6] S. Anupam, A. Shypula, and O. Bastani, 'LLM program optimization via retrieval augmented search,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18916 , 2025. - · arXiv
  7. [7][7] R. Zhang, H. Du, Y. Liu et al. , 'Interactive AI with retrieval-augmented generation for next generation networking,' IEEE Network , vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 414-424, 2024. -
  8. [8][8] H. Zeng et al. , 'Federated recommendation via hybrid retrieval augmented generation,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.04256 , 2024. - · arXiv
  9. [9][9] S. Tang et al. , 'Retrieval-augmented generation for GenAI-enabled semantic communications,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19494 , 2024. - · arXiv
  10. [10][10] Y. Xiong et al. , 'When graph meets retrieval augmented generation for wireless networks: A tutorial and case study,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.07189 , 2024. - · arXiv
  11. [11][11] T. Kagaya et al. , 'RAP: Retrieval-augmented planning with contextual memory for multimodal LLM agents,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03610 , 2024. - · arXiv
  12. [12][12] A. Maatouk et al. , 'Teleqna: A benchmark dataset to assess large language models telecommunications knowledge,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.15051 , 2023. - · arXiv
  13. [13][13] X. Li, G. Dong, J. Jin, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Y. Zhu, P. Zhang, and Z. Dou, 'Search-o1: Agentic search-enhanced large reasoning models,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.05366 , 2025. - · arXiv
  14. [14][14] S. Shankar, T. Chambers, T. Shah, A. G. Parameswaran, and E. Wu, 'Docetl: Agentic query rewriting and evaluation for complex document processing,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12189 , 2024. - · arXiv
  15. [15][15] F. Ayed, A. Maatouk, N. Piovesan, A. De Domenico, M. Debbah, and Z.-Q. Luo, 'Hermes: A large language model framework on the journey to autonomous networks,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.06490 , 2024. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, R., Tang, S., Liu, Y., Niyato, D., Xiong, Z., Sun, S., Mao, S., & Han, Z.
Affiliations
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
  • Auburn University (US)
  • University of Houston (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
197-204
ISSN
0163-6804 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2502.16866
arXiv
2502.16866
OpenAlex
W4417439102
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 12
FWCI
41.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • IEEE Communications Magazine (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2148382)
  • China Scholarship Council (202406320381)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
agentic AI, intelligent communication, intelligent networking, large language models, AI agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review