The DOI matches its DataCite record.
LADDER: Self-Improving LLMs Through Recursive Problem Decomposition
Abstract
We introduce LADDER (Learning through Autonomous Difficulty-Driven Example Recursion), a framework which enables Large Language Models to autonomously improve their problem-solving capabilities through self-guided learning by recursively generating and solving progressively simpler variants of complex problems. Unlike prior approaches that require curated datasets or human feedback, LADDER leverages a model's own capabilities to generate easier question variants. We demonstrate LADDER's effectiveness in the subject of mathematical integration, improving Llama 3.2 3B's accuracy from 1% to 82% on undergraduate-level problems and enabling Qwen2.5 7B Deepseek-R1 Distilled to achieve 73% on the MIT Integration Bee qualifying examination. We also introduce TTRL (Test-Time Reinforcement Learning), where we perform reinforcement learning on variants of test problems at inference time. TTRL enables Qwen2.5 7B Deepseek-R1 Distilled to achieve a state-of-the-art score of 90% on the MIT Integration Bee qualifying examination, surpassing OpenAI o1's performance. These results show how self-directed strategic learning can achieve significant capability improvements without relying on architectural scaling or human supervision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“An additional test-time RL step (TTRL) further enhances performance.”
From The landscape of agentic reinforcement learning for LLMs: a survey (2025) · cites this paper as Simonds & Yoshiyama, 2025
In the citing paper
“LADDER (Simonds & Yoshiyama, 2025) introduces a training-time framework where an LLM recursively generates and solves progressively simpler variants of a complex problem, using verifiable reward signals to guide a difficulty-based curriculum, and achieves substantial improvements in mathematical reasoning.”
From The landscape of agentic reinforcement learning for LLMs: a survey (2025) · cites this paper as Simonds & Yoshiyama, 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The landscape of agentic reinforcement learning for LLMs: a survey
Zhang, G., Geng, H., Yu, X., Yin, Z., Zhang, Z., Tan, Z., Zhou, H., Li, Z., Xue, X., Li, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.02547 · Cited by 229
Olympiad-level formal mathematical reasoning with reinforcement learning
Hubert, T., Mehta, R., Sartran, L., Horváth, M. Z., Žužić, G., Wieser, E., Huang, A., Schrittwieser, J., Schroecker, Y., Masoom, H., et al. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09833-y · Cited by 19
Gao, H.-A., Geng, J., Hua, W., Hu, M., Juan, X., Liu, H., Liu, S., Qiu, J., Qi, X., Wu, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.21046 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Simonds, T., & Yoshiyama, A.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- arXiv
- 2503.00735
- References
- 0
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LADDER: Self-Improving LLMs Through Recursive Problem Decomposition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2503.00735
- The paper
- Simonds, T., & Yoshiyama, A. (2025). LADDER: Self-Improving LLMs Through Recursive Problem Decomposition. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2503.00735
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.