The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Towards Enterprise-Ready Computer Using Generalist Agent
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents our ongoing work toward developing an enterprise-ready Computer Using Generalist Agent (CUGA) system. Our research highlights the evolutionary nature of building agentic systems suitable for enterprise environments. By integrating state-of-the-art agentic AI techniques with a systematic approach to iterative evaluation, analysis, and refinement, we have achieved rapid and cost-effective performance gains, notably reaching a new state-of-the-art performance on the WebArena and AppWorld benchmarks. We detail our development roadmap, the methodology and tools that facilitated rapid learning from failures and continuous system refinement, and discuss key lessons learned and future challenges for enterprise adoption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Notably, on the latest AppWorld leaderboard (as of September 20, 2025; Figure 5), ReAct + ACE (59.4% average) matches the top-1-ranked IBM CUGA (60.3%) 1 , a production-level GPT-4.1-based agent (Marreed et al., 2025), despite using the much smaller open-source model DeepSeek-V3.1.”
From Agentic Context Engineering: Evolving Contexts for Self-Improving Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Marreed et al., 2025
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“On the AppWorld leaderboard, ACE matches the top-ranked production-level agent on the overall average and surpasses it on the harder test-challenge split, despite using a smaller opensource model.”
From Agentic Context Engineering: Evolving Contexts for Self-Improving Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Marreed et al., 2025
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [3][3] Ido Levy, Ben Wiesel, Sami Marreed, Alon Oved, Avi Yaeli, and Segev Shlomov. Stwebagentbench: A benchmark for evaluating safety and trustworthiness in web agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06703 , 2024. - · arXiv
- [5][5] Harsh Trivedi, Tushar Khot, Mareike Hartmann, Ruskin Manku, Vinty Dong, Edward Li, Shashank Gupta, Ashish Sabharwal, and Niranjan Balasubramanian. AppWorld: A controllable world of apps and people for benchmarking interactive coding agents. In ACL , 2024. -
- [8][8] Shuyan Zhou, Frank F Xu, Hao Zhu, Xuhui Zhou, Robert Lo, Abishek Sridhar, Xianyi Cheng, Yonatan Bisk, Daniel Fried, Uri Alon, et al. Webarena: A realistic web environment for building autonomous agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.13854 , 2023. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Agentic Context Engineering: Evolving Contexts for Self-Improving Language Models
Zhang, Q., Hu, C., Upasani, S., Ma, B., Hong, F., Kamanuru, V., Rainton, J., Wu, C., Ji, M., Li, H., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.04618 · Cited by 370
“• On the AppWorld benchmark leaderboard (AppWorld, 2025), ACE surpasses the top-1-ranked production-level agent IBM-CUGA (Marreed et al., 2025) (powered by GPT-4.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Marreed, S., Oved, A., Yaeli, A., Shlomov, S., Levy, I., Akrabi, O., Sela, A., Adi, A., & Mashkif, N.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2503.01861
- OpenAlex
- W4415339023
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Keywords
- agentic AI, enterprise AI, agent-based systems, iterative evaluation, system refinement, enterprise adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
