The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HelpSteer3: Human-Annotated Feedback and Edit Data to Empower Inference-Time Scaling in Open-Ended General-Domain Tasks
Abstract
Inference-Time Scaling has been critical to the success of recent models such as OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek R1. However, many techniques used to train models for inference-time scaling require tasks to have answers that can be verified, limiting their application to domains such as math, coding and logical reasoning. We take inspiration from how humans make first attempts, ask for detailed feedback from others and make improvements based on such feedback across a wide spectrum of open-ended endeavors. To this end, we collect HelpSteer3 data to train dedicated Feedback and Edit Models that are capable of performing inference-time scaling for open-ended general-domain tasks. In our setup, one model generates an initial response, which are given feedback by a second model, that are then used by a third model to edit the response. We show that performance on Arena Hard, a benchmark strongly predictive of Chatbot Arena Elo can be boosted by scaling the number of initial response drafts, effective feedback and edited responses. When scaled optimally, our setup based on 70B models from the Llama 3 family can reach SoTA performance on Arena Hard at 92.7 as of 5 Mar 2025, surpassing OpenAI o1-preview-2024-09-12 with 90.4 and DeepSeek R1 with 92.3.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing alignment datasets, like HelpSteer3, typically contain only sparse labels (e.g., 3 annotators per item).
“Existing alignment datasets, like HelpSteer3 [86], typically contain only sparse labels (e.g., 3 annotators per item).”
From Artificial Hivemind: The Open-Ended Homogeneity of Language Models (and Beyond) (2025) · cites this paper as [86]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluators
Saunders, W., Yeh, C., Wu, J., Bills, S., Ouyang, L., Ward, J., & Leike, J. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.05802 · Cited by 50
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- Nathan Lambert, Jacob Morrison, Valentina Pyatkin, Shengyi Huang, Hamish Ivison, Faeze Brahman, Lester James V. Miranda, Alisa Liu, Nouha Dziri, Shane Lyu, Yuling Gu, Saumya Malik, Victoria Graf, Jena D. Hwang, Jiangjiang Yang, Ronan Le Bras, Oyvind Tafjord, Chris Wilhelm, Luca Soldaini, Noah A. Smith, Yizhong Wang, Pradeep Dasigi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2024. Tulu 3: Pushing fron- tiers in open language model post-training. Preprint, arXiv:2411.15124. · arXiv
- Hunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yura Burda, Harri Edwards, Bowen Baker, Teddy Lee, Jan Leike, John Schulman, Ilya Sutskever, and Karl Cobbe. 2023. Let's verify step by step. Preprint, arXiv:2305.20050. · arXiv
- Zicheng Lin, Zhibin Gou, Tian Liang, Ruilin Luo, Haowei Liu, and Yujiu Yang. 2024. Criticbench: Benchmarking llms for critique-correct reasoning. Preprint, arXiv:2402.14809. Meta Llama. 2024a. Llama-3.1-8b-instruct. https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3. · arXiv
- Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. 2017. Decou- pled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101. · arXiv
- Yu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, and Danqi Chen. 2024. SimPO: Simple preference optimization with a reference-free reward. Preprint, arXiv:2405.14734. · arXiv
- Mayank Mishra, Matt Stallone, Gaoyuan Zhang, Yikang Shen, Aditya Prasad, Adriana Meza Soria, Michele Merler, Parameswaran Selvam, Saptha Surendran, Shivdeep Singh, Manish Sethi, Xuan-Hong Dang, Pengyuan Li, Kun-Lung Wu, Syed Zawad, Andrew Coleman, Matthew White, Mark Lewis, Raju Pavu- luri, Yan Koyfman, Boris Lublinsky, Maximilien de Bayser, Ibrahim Abdelaziz, Kinjal Basu, Mayank Agarwal, Yi Zhou, Chris Johnson, Aanchal Goyal, Hima Patel, Yousaf Shah, Petros Zerfos, Heiko Lud- wig, Asim Munawar, Maxwell Crouse, Pavan Ka- panipathi, Shweta Salaria, Bob Calio, Sophia Wen, Seetharami Seelam, Brian Belgodere, Carlos Fon- seca, Amith Singhee, Nirmit Desai, David D. Cox, Ruchir Puri, and Rameswar Panda. 2024. Granite code models: A family of open foundation models for code intelligence. Preprint, arXiv:2405.04324. · arXiv
- Nvidia, :, Bo Adler, Niket Agarwal, Ashwath Aithal, Dong H. Anh, Pallab Bhattacharya, Annika Brun- dyn, Jared Casper, Bryan Catanzaro, Sharon Clay, Jonathan Cohen, Sirshak Das, Ayush Dattagupta, Olivier Delalleau, Leon Derczynski, Yi Dong, Daniel Egert, Ellie Evans, Aleksander Ficek, Denys Frid- man, Shaona Ghosh, Boris Ginsburg, Igor Gitman, Tomasz Grzegorzek, Robert Hero, Jining Huang, Vibhu Jawa, Joseph Jennings, Aastha Jhunjhunwala, John Kamalu, Sadaf Khan, Oleksii Kuchaiev, Patrick LeGresley, Hui Li, Jiwei Liu, Zihan Liu, Eileen Long, Ameya Sunil Mahabaleshwarkar, Somshubra Ma- jumdar, James Maki, Miguel Martinez, Maer Ro- drigues de Melo, Ivan Moshkov, Deepak Narayanan, Sean Narenthiran, Jesus Navarro, Phong Nguyen, Osvald Nitski, Vahid Noroozi, Guruprasad Nutheti, Christopher Parisien, Jupinder Parmar, Mostofa Pat- wary, Krzysztof Pawelec, Wei Ping, Shrimai Prabhu- moye, Rajarshi Roy, Trisha Saar, Vasanth Rao Naik Sabavat, Sanjeev Satheesh, Jane Polak Scowcroft, Jason Sewall, Pavel Shamis, Gerald Shen, Moham- mad Shoeybi, Dave Sizer, Misha Smelyanskiy, Fe- lipe Soares, Makesh Narsimhan Sreedhar, Dan Su, Sandeep Subramanian, Shengyang Sun, Shubham Toshniwal, Hao Wang, Zhilin Wang, Jiaxuan You, Ji- aqi Zeng, Jimmy Zhang, Jing Zhang, Vivienne Zhang, Yian Zhang, and Chen Zhu. 2024. Nemotron-4 340b technical report. Preprint, arXiv:2406.11704. · arXiv
- Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Car- roll L. Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, John Schulman, Jacob Hilton, Fraser Kelton, Luke Miller, Maddie Simens, Amanda Askell, Peter Welinder, Paul Christiano, Jan Leike, and Ryan Lowe. 2022. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Preprint, arXiv:2203.02155. · arXiv
- Yiwei Qin, Xuefeng Li, Haoyang Zou, Yixiu Liu, Shijie Xia, Zhen Huang, Yixin Ye, Weizhe Yuan, Hector Liu, Yuanzhi Li, and Pengfei Liu. 2024. O1 repli- cation journey: A strategic progress report -part 1. Preprint, arXiv:2410.18982. · arXiv
- Gerald Shen, Zhilin Wang, Olivier Delalleau, Jiaqi Zeng, Yi Dong, Daniel Egert, Shengyang Sun, Jimmy Zhang, Sahil Jain, Ali Taghibakhshi, Markel Sanz Ausin, Ashwath Aithal, and Oleksii Kuchaiev. 2024. NeMo-Aligner: Scalable toolkit for efficient model alignment. Preprint, arXiv:2405.01481. · arXiv
- Quan Shi, Michael Tang, Karthik Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. 2024. Can language mod- els solve olympiad programming? Preprint, arXiv:2404.10952. · arXiv
- Chenglei Si, Diyi Yang, and Tatsunori Hashimoto. 2024. Can llms generate novel research ideas? a large-scale human study with 100+ nlp researchers. Preprint, arXiv:2409.04109. · arXiv
- Gladys Tyen, Hassan Mansoor, Victor Cȃrbune, Peter Chen, and Tony Mak. 2024. Llms cannot find rea- soning errors, but can correct them given the error location. Preprint, arXiv:2311.08516. · arXiv
- Manya Wadhwa, Xinyu Zhao, Junyi Jessy Li, and Greg Durrett. 2024. Learning to refine with fine-grained natural language feedback. Preprint, arXiv:2407.02397. · arXiv
- Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, Sharan Narang, Aakanksha Chowdhery, and Denny Zhou. 2023. Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models. Preprint, arXiv:2203.11171. · arXiv
- Zhilin Wang, Alexander Bukharin, Olivier Delal- leau, Daniel Egert, Gerald Shen, Jiaqi Zeng, Olek- sii Kuchaiev, and Yi Dong. 2024a. Helpsteer2- preference: Complementing ratings with preferences. Preprint, arXiv:2410.01257. · arXiv
- Zhilin Wang, Yi Dong, Olivier Delalleau, Jiaqi Zeng, Gerald Shen, Daniel Egert, Jimmy J. Zhang, Makesh Narsimhan Sreedhar, and Oleksii Kuchaiev. 2024b. Helpsteer2: Open-source dataset for training top-performing reward models. Preprint, arXiv:2406.08673. · arXiv
- Zhilin Wang, Yi Dong, Jiaqi Zeng, Virginia Adams, Makesh Narsimhan Sreedhar, Daniel Egert, Olivier Delalleau, Jane Scowcroft, Neel Kant, Aidan Swope, and Oleksii Kuchaiev. 2024c. HelpSteer: Multi- attribute helpfulness dataset for SteerLM. In Pro- ceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North Amer- ican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 3371-3384, Mexico City, Mexico. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Zhilin Wang, Jiaqi Zeng, Olivier Delalleau, Hoo- Chang Shin, Felipe Soares, Alexander Bukharin, El- lie Evans, Yi Dong, and Oleksii Kuchaiev. 2025. HelpSteer3-Preference: Open human-annotated pref- erence data across diverse tasks and languages. Preprint, arXiv:2505.11475. · arXiv
- Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. 2023. Chain-of-thought prompting elic- its reasoning in large language models. Preprint, arXiv:2201.11903. · arXiv
- Sean Welleck, Ximing Lu, Peter West, Faeze Brah- man, Tianxiao Shen, Daniel Khashabi, and Yejin Choi. 2022. Generating sequences by learning to self-correct. Preprint, arXiv:2211.00053. · arXiv
- Tianhao Wu, Weizhe Yuan, Olga Golovneva, Jing Xu, Yuandong Tian, Jiantao Jiao, Jason Weston, and Sain- bayar Sukhbaatar. 2024. Meta-rewarding language models: Self-improving alignment with llm-as-a- meta-judge. Preprint, arXiv:2407.19594. · arXiv
- Zeqiu Wu, Yushi Hu, Weijia Shi, Nouha Dziri, Alane Suhr, Prithviraj Ammanabrolu, Noah A. Smith, Mari Ostendorf, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2023. Fine- grained human feedback gives better rewards for lan- guage model training. Preprint, arXiv:2306.01693. · arXiv
- Zihuiwen Ye, Fraser Greenlee-Scott, Max Bartolo, Phil Blunsom, Jon Ander Campos, and Matthias Gallé. 2024. Improving reward models with synthetic cri- tiques. Preprint, arXiv:2405.20850. · arXiv
- Yue Yu, Zhengxing Chen, Aston Zhang, Liang Tan, Chenguang Zhu, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Yundi Qian, Xuewei Wang, Suchin Gururangan, Chao Zhang, Melanie Kambadur, Dhruv Mahajan, and Rui Hou. 2024. Self-generated critiques boost re- ward modeling for language models. Preprint, arXiv:2411.16646. · arXiv
- Weizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jing Xu, and Ja- son Weston. 2024. Self-rewarding language models. Preprint, arXiv:2401.10020. · arXiv
- Dan Zhang, Sining Zhoubian, Ziniu Hu, Yisong Yue, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. 2024a. Rest-mcts*: Llm self-training via process reward guided tree search. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03816. · arXiv
- Lunjun Zhang, Arian Hosseini, Hritik Bansal, Mehran Kazemi, Aviral Kumar, and Rishabh Agarwal. 2024b. Generative verifiers: Reward modeling as next-token prediction. Preprint, arXiv:2408.15240. · arXiv
- Yunxiang Zhang, Muhammad Khalifa, Lajanugen Lo- geswaran, Jaekyeom Kim, Moontae Lee, Honglak Lee, and Lu Wang. 2024c. Small language mod- els need strong verifiers to self-correct reasoning. Preprint, arXiv:2404.17140. · arXiv
- Wenting Zhao, Xiang Ren, Jack Hessel, Claire Cardie, Yejin Choi, and Yuntian Deng. 2024. Wildchat: 1m chatgpt interaction logs in the wild. Preprint, arXiv:2405.01470. · arXiv
- Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Zhanghao Wu, Yonghao Zhuang, Zi Lin, Zhuohan Li, Dacheng Li, Eric. P Xing, Hao Zhang, Joseph E. Gonzalez, and Ion Stoica. 2023. Judg- ing llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena. Preprint, arXiv:2306.05685. · arXiv
- Banghua Zhu, Michael I. Jordan, and Jiantao Jiao. 2024. Iterative data smoothing: Mitigating reward overfitting and overoptimization in rlhf. Preprint, arXiv:2401.16335. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial Hivemind: The Open-Ended Homogeneity of Language Models (and Beyond)
Jiang, L., Chai, Y., Li, M., Liu, M., Fok, R., Dziri, N., Tsvetkov, Y., Sap, M., Albalak, A., & Choi, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.22954 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Zeng, J., Delalleau, O., Egert, D., Evans, E., Shin, H.-C., Soares, F., Dong, Y., & Kuchaiev, O.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- arXiv
- 2503.04378
- References
- 1
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
