Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations
Open accessAbstract
Despite widespread speculation about artificial intelligence's impact on the future of work, we lack systematic empirical evidence about how these systems are actually being used for different tasks. Here, we present a novel framework for measuring AI usage patterns across the economy. We leverage a recent privacy-preserving system to analyze over four million Claude.ai conversations through the lens of tasks and occupations in the U.S. Department of Labor's O*NET Database. Our analysis reveals that AI usage primarily concentrates in software development and writing tasks, which together account for nearly half of all total usage. However, usage of AI extends more broadly across the economy, with approximately 36% of occupations using AI for at least a quarter of their associated tasks. We also analyze how AI is being used for tasks, finding 57% of usage suggests augmentation of human capabilities (e.g., learning or iterating on an output) while 43% suggests automation (e.g., fulfilling a request with minimal human involvement). While our data and methods face important limitations and only paint a picture of AI usage on a single platform, they provide an automated, granular approach for tracking AI's evolving role in the economy and identifying leading indicators of future impact as these technologies continue to advance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Handa et al. (2025) map Claude.ai conversations onto O*NET tasks and occupations and document that AI use concentrates in software engineering, writing and analytical tasks, peaks in mid-to high-wage occupations rather than at either extreme of the wage distribution, and splits roughly evenly between automation and augmentation.
“Moving from predicted exposure to measured use, Handa et al. (2025) map Claude.aiconversations onto O*NET tasks and occupations and document that AI use concentrates in software engineering, writing and analytical tasks, peaks in mid-to high-wage occupations rather than at either extreme of the wage distribution, and splits roughly evenly between automation and augmentation.”
From Labor Market Consequences of Generative AI: Early Evidence from Norway (2026) · cites this paper as Handa et al., 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [18]18. National Center for O*NET Development. O*NET OnLine, 2025b. URL https://www. onetonline.org/ . U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA). Licensed under CC BY 4.0. - S. Noy and W. Zhang. Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science , 381(6654):187-192, 2023. - S. Peng, E. Kalliamvakou, P. Cihon, and M. Demirer. The impact of ai on developer productivity: Evidence from github copilot. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06590 , 2023. - N. Reimers and I. Gurevych. all-mpnet-base-v2: Mpnet-based sentence embedding model. https: //huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2 , 2022. Sentence transformer model based on MPNet, trained on over 1B training pairs. - A. Tamkin, M. McCain, K. Handa, E. Durmus, L. Lovitt, A. Rathi, S. Huang, A. Mountfield, J. Hong, S. Ritchie, M. Stern, B. Clarke, L. Goldberg, T. R. Sumers, J. Mueller, W. McEachen, W. Mitchell, S. Carter, J. Clark, J. Kaplan, and D. Ganguli. Clio: Privacy-preserving insights into real-world ai use, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13678 . - P. Trammell and A. Korinek. Economic growth under transformative ai. Working Paper 31815, National Bureau of Economic Research, October 2023. URL http://www.nber.org/papers/ w31815 . · arXiv
- [6]6. US Census Bureau. Income in the United States: 2022. Census.gov, 2022. - M. Webb. The impact of artificial intelligence on the labor market. Economics of Innovation eJournal , 2019. - E. Wiles, L. Krayer, M. Abbadi, U. Awasthi, R. Kennedy, P. Mishkin, D. Sack, and F. Candelon. Genai as an exoskeleton: Experimental evidence on knowledge workers using genai on new skills. Available at SSRN 4944588 , 2024.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The widespread adoption of large language model-assisted writing across society
Liang, W., Zhang, Y., Codreanu, M., Wang, J., Cao, H., & Zou, J. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101366 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversation
Laban, P., Hayashi, H., Zhou, Y., & Neville, J. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 10 · see citing works
How AI Impacts Skill Formation
Shen, J. H., & Tamkin, A. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.20245 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“For example, AI tools are being used in professional domains such as software development, education, design, and the sciences [Handa et al., 2025].”
Self-citationLabor Market Consequences of Generative AI: Early Evidence from Norway
Facius, D., & Iacono, R. (2026) · CESifo Working Papers · doi:10.65864/8a4auliirt
- Authors
- Handa, K., Tamkin, A., McCain, M., Huang, S., Durmus, E., Heck, S., Mueller, J., Hong, J., Ritchie, S., Belonax, T., Troy, K. K., Amodei, D., Kaplan, J., Clark, J., & Ganguli, D.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2503.04761
- OpenAlex
- W6892014898
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- AI usage patterns, Claude AI, large language models, task classification, occupation, O*NET, software development, writing assignments, future of work
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
