PreprintCited by 2Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureError Correcting Code TechniquesQuantum Information and Cryptography

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Tesseract: A Search-Based Decoder for Quantum Error Correction

Open access

Abstract

Tesseract is a Most-Likely Error decoder designed for low-density-parity-check quantum error-correcting codes. Tesseract conducts a search through a graph on the set of all subsets of errors to find the lowest cost subset of errors consistent with the input syndrome. Although this graph is exponentially large, the search can be made efficient in practice for random errors using $A^*$ search technique along with a few pruning heuristics. We show through benchmark circuits for surface, color, and bivariate-bicycle codes that Tesseract is significantly faster than integer programming-based decoders while retaining comparable accuracy at moderate physical error rates. We also find that Tesseract can decode transversal CNOT protocols for surface codes on neutral atom quantum computers. Finally, we compare surface code and bivariate bicycle code circuits, finding that the [[144,12,12]] bivariate bicycle code is $14\times$ to $19\times$ more efficient than surface codes using our most-likely error decoding, whereas using correlated matching and BP+OSD decoders would have implied only a $10\times$ improvement. Assuming instead that long-range couplers are $10\times$ noisier, the improvement drops to around $4\times$ using Tesseract or $2\times$ using correlated matching and BP+OSD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2503.10988

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For more general detector-model decoding beyond graph-like settings, recent works have proposed the decision-tree decoder and the closely related Tesseract decoder for QEC codes.

    “For more general detector-model decoding beyond graph-like settings, recent works have proposed the decision-tree decoder [207] and the closely related Tesseract decoder for QEC codes [208].”

    From Quantum error correction and fault tolerance: A comprehensive tutorial (2026) · cites this paper as [208]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [BCC + 19] Paul Baireuther, Marcello D Caio, Ben Criger, Carlo WJ Beenakker, and Thomas E O'Brien. Neural network decoder for topological color codes with circuit level noise. New Journal of Physics , 21(1):013003, 2019.
  2. [BCG + 24] Sergey Bravyi, Andrew W Cross, Jay M Gambetta, Dmitri Maslov, Patrick Rall, and Theodore J Yoder. High-threshold and low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory. Nature , 627(8005):778782, 2024.
  3. [BMD06] Hector Bombin and Miguel Angel Martin-Delgado. Topological quantum distillation. Physical review letters , 97(18):180501, 2006.
  4. [CZZ + 24] Madelyn Cain, Chen Zhao, Hengyun Zhou, Nadine Meister, J Pablo Bonilla Ataides, Arthur Jaffe, Dolev Bluvstein, and Mikhail D Lukin. Correlated decoding of logical algorithms with transversal gates. Physical Review Letters , 133(24):240602, 2024.
  5. [Dij22] Edsger W Dijkstra. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. In Edsger Wybe Dijkstra: his life, work, and legacy , pages 287-290. 2022.
  6. [DKLP02] Eric Dennis, Alexei Kitaev, Andrew Landahl, and John Preskill. Topological quantum memory. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 43(9):4452-4505, 2002.
  7. [GJ23] Craig Gidney and Cody Jones. New circuits and an open source decoder for the color code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.08813 , 2023. · arXiv
  8. [HH18] Qi Huangfu and JA Julian Hall. Parallelizing the dual revised simplex method. Mathematical Programming Computation , 10(1):119-142, 2018.
  9. [HNR68] Peter E Hart, Nils J Nilsson, and Bertram Raphael. A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics , 4(2):100-107, 1968.
  10. [LAR11] Andrew J Landahl, Jonas T Anderson, and Patrick R Rice. Fault-tolerant quantum computing with color codes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1108.5738 , 2011. · arXiv
  11. [LBH + 24] Nathan Lacroix, Alexandre Bourassa, Francisco JH Heras, Lei M Zhang, Johannes Bausch, Andrew W Senior, Thomas Edlich, Noah Shutty, Volodymyr Sivak, Andreas Bengtsson, et al. Scaling and logic in the color code on a superconducting quantum processor. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14256 , 2024. · arXiv
  12. [OHB25] Kai R Ott, Bence Het´ enyi, and Michael E Beverland. Decision-tree decoders for general quantum ldpc codes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16408 , 2025. · arXiv
  13. [PC08] David Poulin and Yeojin Chung. On the iterative decoding of sparse quantum codes. Quantum Info. Comput. , 8(10):987-1000, November 2008.
  14. [SNV24] Noah Shutty, Michael Newman, and Benjamin Villalonga. Efficient near-optimal decoding of the surface code through ensembling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12434 , 2024. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Beni, L. A., Higgott, O., & Shutty, N.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4417281668
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Error Correcting Code Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
quantum error correction, error decoding, LDPC codes, A* algorithm, pruning heuristics, surface code, bivariate bicycle codes, color codes, neutral atom quantum computers, syndrome decoding, belief propagation, integer programming comparison, decoding efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review