The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
A Reference Architecture for Autonomous Networks: An Agent-Based Approach
Open accessAbstract
The vision of autonomous systems is becoming increasingly important in many application areas, where the aim is to replace humans with agents. These include autonomous vehicles and other agents' applications in business processes and problem-solving. For networks, the increasing scale and operation and management (O&M) complexity drive the need for autonomous networks (AN). The technical objective of AN is to ensure trustworthy O&M without human intervention for higher efficiency and lower operating costs. However, realizing AN seems more difficult than autonomous vehicles. It encounters challenges of networks' structural and functional complexity, which operate as distributed dynamic systems governed by various technical and economic constraints. A key problem lies in formulating a rigorous development methodology that facilitates a seamless transition from traditional networks to AN. Central to this methodology is the definition of a reference architecture for network agents, which specifies the required functionalities for their realization, regardless of implementation choices. This article proposes a reference architecture characterizing main functional features, illustrating its application with network use cases. It shows how artificial intelligence components can be used to implement the required functionality and its coordination. The latter is achieved through the management and generation of shared domain-specific knowledge stored in long-term memory, ensuring the overall consistency of decisions and their execution. The article concludes with a discussion of architecture specialization for building network layer agents. It also identifies the main technical challenges ahead, such as satisfying essential requirements at development or runtime, as well as the issue of coordinating agents to achieve collective intelligence in meeting overall network goals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Agentic AI provides comprehensive end-to-end workflow orchestration.
“Comprehensive end-to-end workflow orchestration”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [71]
In network operations, an agentic AI can interpret controlling commands and independently react to failure by interpreting and implementing possible actions in real-time to make a decision to execute an action.
“Similarly, in network operations [71], an agentic AI can interpret controlling commands and independently react to failure by interpreting and implementing possible actions in real-time [82] to make a decision to execute an action.”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [71]
Many of the processes used intermediate representations of states and often had feedback loops to make decisions in dynamic environments.
“Many of the processes used intermediate representations of states and often had feedback loops to make decisions in dynamic environments, as we depicted in the annotation [71,105].”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [71]
Traditional AI systems generally work on structured, static inputs and produce fixed or predefined outputs.
“Traditional AI systems generally work on structured, static inputs and produce fixed [71] or predefined outputs [135].”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [71]
Self-healing architectures can identify failures and correct problems on their own.
“Technologies like self-healing architectures can identify failures and correct problems on their own [71,121,123]”
From The Rise of Agentic AI: A Review of Definitions, Frameworks, Architectures, Applications, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [71]
Metadata
- Authors
- Sifakis, J., Li, D., Huang, H., Zhang, Y., Dang, W., Huang, R., & Yu, Y.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2503.12871
- OpenAlex
- W4414900403
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Mobile Agent-Based Network Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Keywords
- autonomous networks, reference architecture, network agents, agent-based systems, network operation and maintenance, artificial intelligence in networks, long-term memory, domain knowledge, agent coordination, collective intelligence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review