PreprintCited by 0Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Enhancing Vision Foundation Models via Multimodal Continual Pre-Training

Open access
Chen, Yitong, Meng, Lingchen, Peng, Wujian, Tao, Jun, Xu, Chenjie, Wu, Zuxuan, Jiang, Yu-Gang·2025·arXiv

Abstract

Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) provide strong visual representations for a wide range of applications. In this work, we enhance prevailing VFMs through multimodal training, allowing them to effectively process visual inputs at varying resolutions while producing visual representations that are better aligned with language representations, regardless of their original pre-training objectives. To this end, we introduce M-CPT, a Multimodal Continual Pre-Training framework designed to improve the understanding capability of pre-trained VFMs while preserving their strong visual representation quality. M-CPT introduces a Continual Position Embedding (CPE) for handling flexible visual resolutions, along with a feature alignment objective that improves the consistency between visual and textual representations during multimodal training. Extensive experiments on leading VFMs, including DINOv2, SigLIP, and AIMv2, demonstrate that M-CPT consistently improves multimodal understanding performance while preserving strong performance on standard vision benchmarks such as classification and segmentation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2503.18931

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, M. Dehghani, M. Minderer, G. Heigold, S. Gelly, J. Uszkoreit, and N. Houlsby, "An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale," in ICLR, 2021. 2, 11
  2. A. Masry, X. L. Do, J. Q. Tan, S. Joty, and E. Hoque, "Chartqa: A benchmark for question answering about charts with visual and logical reasoning," in ACL Findings, 2022. 2, 8, 10, 17, 18
  3. M. Mathew, D. Karatzas, and C. Jawahar, "Docvqa: A dataset for vqa on document images," in WACV, 2021. 2, 8, 10, 17, 18
  4. R. Tian, Z. Wu, Q. Dai, H. Hu, Y. Qiao, and Y.-G. Jiang, "Resformer: Scaling vits with multi-resolution training," in CVPR, 2023. 2, 3
  5. B. Li, Y. Zhang, D. Guo, R. Zhang, F. Li, H. Zhang, K. Zhang, P. Zhang, Y. Li, Z. Liu, and C. Li, "Llava-onevision: Easy visual task transfer," TMLR, 2024. 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 18, 19
  6. J. Park, J. Lee, and K. Sohn, "Bridging vision and language spaces with assignment prediction," in ICLR, 2024. 3, 5, 6
  7. M. Dehghani, B. Mustafa, J. Djolonga, J. Heek, M. Minderer, M. Caron, A. Steiner, J. Puigcerver, R. Geirhos, I. M. Alabdulmohsin et al., "Patch n'pack: Navit, a vision transformer for any aspect ratio and resolution," in NeurIPS, 2023. 3
  8. B. Heo, S. Park, D. Han, and S. Yun, "Rotary position embedding for vision transformer," in ECCV, 2024. 3
  9. M. Cuturi, "Sinkhorn distances: Lightspeed computation of optimal transport," in NeurIPS, 2013. 4, 6
  10. W. Dai, J. Li, D. Li, A. M. H. Tiong, J. Zhao, W. Wang, B. Li, P. N. Fung, and S. Hoi, "Instructblip: Towards general-purpose vision-language models with instruction tuning," NeurIPS, 2024. 5, 11
  11. J.-B. Alayrac, J. Donahue, P. Luc, A. Miech, I. Barr, Y. Hasson, K. Lenc, A. Mensch, K. Millican, M. Reynolds et al., "Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning," NeurIPS, 2022. 5, 11
  12. J. Yu, Z. Wang, V. Vasudevan, L. Yeung, M. Seyedhosseini, and Y. Wu, "Coca: Contrastive captioners are image-text foundation models," in Trans. Mach. Learn. Res., 2022. 5, 11
  13. X. Li, F. Zhang, H. Diao, Y. Wang, X. Wang, and L.-Y. Duan, "Densefusion-1m: Merging vision experts for comprehensive multimodal perception," in NeurIPS, 2024.
  14. A. Kembhavi, M. Salvato, E. Kolve, M. Seo, H. Hajishirzi, and A. Farhadi, "A diagram is worth a dozen images," in ECCV, 2016. 8, 10
  15. X. Yue, Y. Ni, K. Zhang, T. Zheng, R. Liu, G. Zhang, S. Stevens, D. Jiang, W. Ren, Y. Sun, C. Wei, B. Yu, R. Yuan, R. Sun, M. Yin, B. Zheng, Z. Yang, Y. Liu, W. Huang, H. Sun, Y. Su, and W. Chen, "Mmmu: A massive multi-discipline multimodal understanding and reasoning benchmark for expert agi," in CVPR, 2024.
  16. D. Schwenk, A. Khandelwal, C. Clark, K. Marino, and R. Mottaghi, "A-okvqa: A benchmark for visual question answering using world knowledge," in ECCV, 2022.
  17. M. Mathew, V. Bagal, R. Tito, D. Karatzas, E. Valveny, and C. Jawahar, "Info- graphicvqa," in WACV, 2022. 8
  18. J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei, "Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database," in CVPR, 2009. 8, 9, 20
  19. K. He, X. Chen, S. Xie, Y. Li, P. Dollár, and R. Girshick, "Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners," in CVPR, 2022. 9, 11
  20. H. Bao, L. Dong, S. Piao, and F. Wei, "Beit: Bert pre-training of image transformers," in ICLR, 2021. 11
  21. C. Jia, Y. Yang, Y. Xia, Y.-T. Chen, Z. Parekh, H. Pham, Q. Le, Y.-H. Sung, Z. Li, and T. Duerig, "Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervision," in ICML, 2021. 11
  22. C. Schuhmann, R. Beaumont, R. Vencu, C. W. Gordon, R. Wightman, M. Cherti, T. Coombes, A. Katta, C. Mullis, M. Wortsman, P. Schramowski, S. R. Kundurthy, K. Crowson, L. Schmidt, R. Kaczmarczyk, and J. Jitsev, "LAION-5b: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models," in NeurIPS, 2022. 11
  23. W. Peng, S. Xie, Z. You, S. Lan, and Z. Wu, "Synthesize diagnose and optimize: Towards fine-grained vision-language understanding," in CVPR, 2024. 11
  24. S. Wu, W. Zhang, L. Xu, S. Jin, X. Li, W. Liu, and C. C. Loy, "Clipself: Vision transformer distills itself for open-vocabulary dense prediction," in ICLR, 2024. 11
  25. J. Li, D. Li, C. Xiong, and S. Hoi, "Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation," in ICML, 2022. 11
  26. J. Li, D. Li, S. Savarese, and S. Hoi, "Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre- training with frozen image encoders and large language models," in ICML, 2023.

Authors
Chen, Y., Meng, L., Peng, W., Tao, J., Xu, C., Wu, Z., & Jiang, Y.-G.
Affiliations
Fudan University (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W6910650848
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (24511103100)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
vision foundation models, multimodal pre-training, continual pre-training, multimodal understanding, DINOv2, SigLIP

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review