PreprintCited by 7Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsTopic ModelingScientific Computing and Data Management

Towards Scientific Intelligence: A Survey of LLM-based Scientific Agents

Open access
Ren, Shuo, Xie, Can, Jian, Pu, Ren, Zhenjiang, Leng, Chunlin, Zhang, Jiajun·2025·arXiv

Abstract

As scientific research becomes increasingly complex, innovative tools are needed to manage vast data, facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration, and accelerate discovery. Large language models (LLMs) are now evolving into LLM-based scientific agents that automate critical tasks ranging from hypothesis generation and experiment design to data analysis and simulation. Unlike general-purpose LLMs, these specialized agents integrate domain-specific knowledge, advanced tool sets, and robust validation mechanisms, enabling them to handle complex data types, ensure reproducibility, and drive scientific breakthroughs. This survey provides a focused review of the architectures, design, benchmarks, applications, and ethical considerations surrounding LLM-based scientific agents. We highlight why they differ from general agents and the ways in which they advance research across various scientific fields. By examining their development and challenges, this survey offers a comprehensive roadmap for researchers and practitioners to harness these agents for more efficient, reliable, and ethically sound scientific discovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2503.24047

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Agentic workloads characteristically interleave inference steps to derive the next action and execution steps where the agent calls an external tool.

    “These workloads characteristically interleave (a) inference steps to derive the next action, and (b) execution steps where the agent calls an external tool.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 7

Authors
Ren, S., Xie, C., Jian, P., Ren, Z., Leng, C., & Zhang, J.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4417088765
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
Keywords
large language models, hypothesis generation, experimental design, scientific data analysis, scientific simulation, reproducibility, agent architecture, benchmarking, interdisciplinary collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review