The DOI matches its DataCite record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
LLMs for Explainable AI: A Comprehensive Survey
Open accessAbstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising approach to enhancing Explainable AI (XAI) by transforming complex machine learning outputs into easy-to-understand narratives, making model predictions more accessible to users, and helping bridge the gap between sophisticated model behavior and human interpretability. AI models, such as state-of-the-art neural networks and deep learning models, are often seen as "black boxes" due to a lack of transparency. As users cannot fully understand how the models reach conclusions, users have difficulty trusting decisions from AI models, which leads to less effective decision-making processes, reduced accountabilities, and unclear potential biases. A challenge arises in developing explainable AI (XAI) models to gain users' trust and provide insights into how models generate their outputs. With the development of Large Language Models, we want to explore the possibilities of using human language-based models, LLMs, for model explainabilities. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of existing approaches regarding LLMs for XAI, and evaluation techniques for LLM-generated explanation, discusses the corresponding challenges and limitations, and examines real-world applications. Finally, we discuss future directions by emphasizing the need for more interpretable, automated, user-centric, and multidisciplinary approaches for XAI via LLMs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This should help manage user expectations about the CA capabilities and mitigate trust damage by making the system seem less arbitrary and more predictable, ultimately contributing to a more resilient user-CA relationship (Bilal et al., 2025;Schöbel et al., 2024).”
From Explainability in AI: Comparing Human-Like and System-Like Trust Repair Strategies (2026) · cites this paper as Bilal et al., 2025
In the citing paper
“Rather than appealing to affect, these strategies offer cognitive scaffolding that allows users to make an informed assessment of future reliability (Bilal et al., 2025;Zhao et al., 2024).”
From Explainability in AI: Comparing Human-Like and System-Like Trust Repair Strategies (2026) · cites this paper as Bilal et al., 2025
In the citing paper
“CAs based on different LLMs that vary in architecture, instruction-tuning approach, or parameter size may influence overall interaction quality and, consequently, users' perceptions of the CA and its repair responses”
From Explainability in AI: Comparing Human-Like and System-Like Trust Repair Strategies (2026) · cites this paper as Bilal et al., 2025
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ozgun, M. C., Pei, J., Hindriks, K., Donatelli, L., Liu, Q., & Wang, J. (2025) · Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3746252.3761164 · Cited by 7
Mixture-of-experts graph transformers for interpretable particle collision detection
Genovese, D., Sgroi, A., Devoto, A., Valentine, S., Wood, L., Sebastiani, C., Scardapane, S., D'Onofrio, M., & Giagu, S. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-12003-9 · Cited by 7
Advances, Evaluation, and Explainability of Large Language Models in Healthcare: A Systematic Review
Amin, S. U., Guizani, M., & Hossain, M. S. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · doi:10.1145/3786334 · Cited by 5
SynthEHR-eviction: enhancing eviction SDoH detection with LLM-augmented synthetic EHR data
Yao, Z., Zhao, Y., Mitra, A., Levy, D. A., Druhl, E., Tsai, J., & Yu, H. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02473-0 · Cited by 1
Who Does What? Archetypes of Roles Assigned to LLMs During Human-AI Decision-Making
Chappidi, S., Singh, J. P., & Krauze, A. V. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791428 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Bilal, A., Ebert, D., & Lin, B.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2504.00125
- OpenAlex
- W4417223409
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- large language models, explainable AI, LLM-generated explanations, automated explanation generation, explanation evaluation, black-box models, interpretability, user trust in AI, explainable deep learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LLMs for Explainable AI: A Comprehensive Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2504.00125
- The paper
- Bilal, A., Ebert, D., & Lin, B. (2025). LLMs for Explainable AI: A Comprehensive Survey. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2504.00125