A Survey of Large Language Model-Powered Spatial Intelligence Across Scales: Advances in Embodied Agents, Smart Cities, and Earth Science
Open accessAbstract
Over the past year, the development of large language models (LLMs) has brought spatial intelligence into focus, with much attention on vision-based embodied intelligence. However, spatial intelligence spans a broader range of disciplines and scales, from navigation and urban planning to remote sensing and earth science. What are the differences and connections between spatial intelligence across these fields? In this paper, we first review human spatial cognition and its implications for spatial intelligence in LLMs. We then examine spatial memory, knowledge representations, and abstract reasoning in LLMs, highlighting their roles and connections. Finally, we analyze spatial intelligence across scales -- from embodied to urban and global levels -- following a framework that progresses from spatial memory and understanding to spatial reasoning and intelligence. Through this survey, we aim to provide insights into interdisciplinary spatial intelligence research and inspire future studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These approaches leverage unified learning from multiple agents and differential privacy techniques to ensure that information derived from one user or agent cannot be directly reconstructed or leaked to others.
“These approaches leverage unified learning from multiple agents and differential privacy (DP) techniques to ensure that information derived from one user or agent cannot be directly reconstructed or leaked to others.”
From Memory Fabric for Conversational AI Agents: Enabling Shared and Persistent Memory Across Users (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
A combined multi-agent system paradigm highlights the need for decentralized memory architectures that allow agents to share knowledge without a centralized sensitive data store.
“A combined multi-agent system paradigm highlights the need for decentralized memory architectures that allow agents to share knowledge without the need for a centralized sensitive data store [32].”
From Memory Fabric for Conversational AI Agents: Enabling Shared and Persistent Memory Across Users (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding World or Predicting Future? A Comprehensive Survey of World Models
Ding, J., Zhang, Y., Shang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zong, Z., Feng, J., Yuan, Y., Su, H., Li, N., Sukiennik, N., et al. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3746449 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationMemory Fabric for Conversational AI Agents: Enabling Shared and Persistent Memory Across Users
Tiwari, A., & Gupta, V. (2025) · TechRxiv · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.176523350.08289935/v1
- Authors
- Feng, J., Zeng, J., Long, Q., Chen, H., Zhao, J., Xi, Y., Zhou, Z., Yuan, Y., Wang, S., Zeng, Q., Li, S., Zhang, Y., Lin, Y., Li, T., Ding, J., Gao, C., Xu, F., & Li, Y.
- Affiliations
- Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (CN)
- Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School (CN)
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2504.09848
- OpenAlex
- W4415158318
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- large language models, spatial ability, human spatial cognition, spatial memory, knowledge representation, abstract thinking, embodied agents, smart cities, urban planning, navigation, remote sensing, earth sciences, spatial reasoning, interdisciplinary research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
