PreprintCited by 19Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the network

Open access
Bolya, Daniel, Huang, Po-Yao, Sun, Peize, Cho, Jang Hyun, Madotto, Andrea, Wei, Chen, Ma, Tengyu, Zhi, Jiale +10 more·2025·arXiv

Abstract

We introduce Perception Encoder (PE), a state-of-the-art vision encoder for image and video understanding trained via simple vision-language learning. Traditionally, vision encoders have relied on a variety of pretraining objectives, each tailored to specific downstream tasks such as classification, captioning, or localization. Surprisingly, after scaling our carefully tuned image pretraining recipe and refining with our robust video data engine, we find that contrastive vision-language training alone can produce strong, general embeddings for all of these downstream tasks. There is only one caveat: these embeddings are hidden within the intermediate layers of the network. To draw them out, we introduce two alignment methods: language alignment for multimodal language modeling, and spatial alignment for dense prediction. Together, our PE family of models achieves best-in-class results on a wide variety of tasks, including (1) zero-shot image and video classification and retrieval, simultaneously obtaining 86.6 average zero-shot ImageNet robustness and 76.9 zero-shot Kinetics-400 video classification; (2) document, image, and video Q&A, enabling 94.6 DocVQA, 80.9 InfographicVQA, and 82.7 PerceptionTest with an 8B LLM; and (3) spatial tasks such as detection, tracking, and depth estimation, setting a new COCO state-of-the-art of 66.0 box mAP. To foster further research, we release our models, code, and novel dataset of synthetically and human-annotated videos: https://github.com/facebookresearch/perception_models

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2504.13181

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The best features for downstream tasks are not necessarily obtained from the last layer of a VLM.

    “Recently, (El-Nouby et al., 2024; Bolya et al., 2025; Rajasegaran et al., 2025) have shown that the best features for downstream tasks are not necessarily obtained from the last layer of a VLM.”

    From SmolVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for Affordable and Efficient Robotics (2025) · cites this paper as Bolya et al., 2025

Cites

  • DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detection

    Zhang, H., Li, F., Liu, S., Zhang, L., Su, H., Zhu, J., Ni, L. M., & Shum, H.-Y. (2022) · arXiv · Cited by 1,154 · cited 2× · see citing works

    “Encoder Params Detector COCOAP box SwinV2-G [80] 3.0B HTC++ [14] 62.5 Swin-L [79] 0.3B DINO [161] 63.2 EVA02-L [35] 0.3B Cascade [11] 64.1 InternImage-G [145] 3.0B DINO [161] 65.3 EVA02-L [35] 0.3B CoDETR [169] 65.9 PE spatial G 1.9B DETA [99] 66.0 Comparing to the leading results on COCO [76]…”
    Influential

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bolya, D., Huang, P.-Y., Sun, P., Cho, J. H., Madotto, A., Wei, C., Ma, T., Zhi, J., Rajasegaran, J., Rasheed, H., Wang, J., Monteiro, M., Xu, H., Dong, S., Ravi, N., Li, D., Dollár, P., & Feichtenhofer, C.
Affiliations
  • xAI (United States) (US)
  • Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence (AE)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Meta (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Meta (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
Pages
67743-67796
ISSN
1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4417091809
Cited by
19
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 19
FWCI
14.26
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
vision encoder, vision-language pre-training, contrastive learning, language alignment, spatial alignment, zero-shot image classification, video retrieval, document question answering, visual question answering, video question answering, object detection, object tracking, depth estimation, synthetic video dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review