Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the network
Open accessAbstract
We introduce Perception Encoder (PE), a state-of-the-art vision encoder for image and video understanding trained via simple vision-language learning. Traditionally, vision encoders have relied on a variety of pretraining objectives, each tailored to specific downstream tasks such as classification, captioning, or localization. Surprisingly, after scaling our carefully tuned image pretraining recipe and refining with our robust video data engine, we find that contrastive vision-language training alone can produce strong, general embeddings for all of these downstream tasks. There is only one caveat: these embeddings are hidden within the intermediate layers of the network. To draw them out, we introduce two alignment methods: language alignment for multimodal language modeling, and spatial alignment for dense prediction. Together, our PE family of models achieves best-in-class results on a wide variety of tasks, including (1) zero-shot image and video classification and retrieval, simultaneously obtaining 86.6 average zero-shot ImageNet robustness and 76.9 zero-shot Kinetics-400 video classification; (2) document, image, and video Q&A, enabling 94.6 DocVQA, 80.9 InfographicVQA, and 82.7 PerceptionTest with an 8B LLM; and (3) spatial tasks such as detection, tracking, and depth estimation, setting a new COCO state-of-the-art of 66.0 box mAP. To foster further research, we release our models, code, and novel dataset of synthetically and human-annotated videos: https://github.com/facebookresearch/perception_models
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The best features for downstream tasks are not necessarily obtained from the last layer of a VLM.
“Recently, (El-Nouby et al., 2024; Bolya et al., 2025; Rajasegaran et al., 2025) have shown that the best features for downstream tasks are not necessarily obtained from the last layer of a VLM.”
From SmolVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for Affordable and Efficient Robotics (2025) · cites this paper as Bolya et al., 2025
Cites
DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detection
Zhang, H., Li, F., Liu, S., Zhang, L., Su, H., Zhu, J., Ni, L. M., & Shum, H.-Y. (2022) · arXiv · Cited by 1,154 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Encoder Params Detector COCOAP box SwinV2-G [80] 3.0B HTC++ [14] 62.5 Swin-L [79] 0.3B DINO [161] 63.2 EVA02-L [35] 0.3B Cascade [11] 64.1 InternImage-G [145] 3.0B DINO [161] 65.3 EVA02-L [35] 0.3B CoDETR [169] 65.9 PE spatial G 1.9B DETA [99] 66.0 Comparing to the leading results on COCO [76]…”
Influential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planning
Assran, M., Bardes, A., Fan, D., Garrido, Q., Howes, R., Mojtaba, Komeili, Muckley, M., Rizvi, A., Roberts, C., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.09985 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“We observe that V-JEPA 2 exhibits competitive performance in the frozen setup, outperforming DINOv2, SigLIP, and Perception Encoder (PE) in all of the tested benchmarks (Table 6) except PerceptionTest where V-JEPA 2 slightly underperforms SigLIP and PE.”
InfluentialSmolVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for Affordable and Efficient Robotics
Shukor, M., Aubakirova, D., Capuano, F., Kooijmans, P., Palma, S., Zouitine, A., Aractingi, M., Pascal, C., Russi, M., Marafioti, A., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.01844 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Recently, (El-Nouby et al., 2024; Bolya et al., 2025; Rajasegaran et al., 2025) have shown that the best features for downstream tasks are not necessarily obtained from the last layer of a VLM.”
Back into Plato's Cave: Examining Cross-modal Representational Convergence at Scale
Koepke, A. S., Zverev, D., Ginosar, S., & Efros, A. A. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.18572
“To test whether our findings extend beyond the text-image setting, we evaluate alignment between LLMs and a video encoder (VideoMAE-v2 [97]) on the PVD-100k dataset, a 100k subset of PVD [8, 100], and between LLMs and an audio encoder (Dasheng [17]) on a 100k subset of LAION-Audio630k [103].”
Revisiting the Platonic Representation Hypothesis: An Aristotelian View
Gröger, F., Wen, S., & Brbić, M. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.14486
“A natural question is whether this finding is robust across model families and metric variants.”
- Authors
- Bolya, D., Huang, P.-Y., Sun, P., Cho, J. H., Madotto, A., Wei, C., Ma, T., Zhi, J., Rajasegaran, J., Rasheed, H., Wang, J., Monteiro, M., Xu, H., Dong, S., Ravi, N., Li, D., Dollár, P., & Feichtenhofer, C.
- Affiliations
- xAI (United States) (US)
- Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence (AE)
- Fudan University (CN)
- Meta (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Meta (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- Pages
- 67743-67796
- ISSN
- 1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2504.13181
- OpenAlex
- W4417091809
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19
- FWCI
- 14.26
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- vision encoder, vision-language pre-training, contrastive learning, language alignment, spatial alignment, zero-shot image classification, video retrieval, document question answering, visual question answering, video question answering, object detection, object tracking, depth estimation, synthetic video dataset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review