PreprintCited by 1Cryptography and Data SecurityBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

TeleSparse: Practical Privacy-Preserving Verification of Deep Neural Networks

Open access
Maheri, Mohammad M, Haddadi, Hamed, Davidson, Alex·2025·arXiv

Abstract

Verification of the integrity of deep learning inference is crucial for understanding whether a model is being applied correctly. However, such verification typically requires access to model weights and (potentially sensitive or private) training data. So-called Zero-knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Arguments of Knowledge (ZK-SNARKs) would appear to provide the capability to verify model inference without access to such sensitive data. However, applying ZK-SNARKs to modern neural networks, such as transformers and large vision models, introduces significant computational overhead. We present TeleSparse, a ZK-friendly post-processing mechanisms to produce practical solutions to this problem. TeleSparse tackles two fundamental challenges inherent in applying ZK-SNARKs to modern neural networks: (1) Reducing circuit constraints: Over-parameterized models result in numerous constraints for ZK-SNARK verification, driving up memory and proof generation costs. We address this by applying sparsification to neural network models, enhancing proof efficiency without compromising accuracy or security. (2) Minimizing the size of lookup tables required for non-linear functions, by optimizing activation ranges through neural teleportation, a novel adaptation for narrowing activation functions' range. TeleSparse reduces prover memory usage by 67% and proof generation time by 46% on the same model, with an accuracy trade-off of approximately 1%. We implement our framework using the Halo2 proving system and demonstrate its effectiveness across multiple architectures (Vision-transformer, ResNet, MobileNet) and datasets (ImageNet,CIFAR-10,CIFAR-100). This work opens new directions for ZK-friendly model design, moving toward scalable, resource-efficient verifiable deep learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2504.19274

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • zk-SNARKs have emerged as a promising cryptographic technique for verifying computations, particularly in deep neural network inference.

    “Recently, zero-knowledge succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (zk-SNARKs) have emerged as a promising cryptographic technique for verifying computations, particularly in deep neural network inference [1].”

    From Verifiable Unlearning on Edge (2025) · cites this paper as [1]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Verifiable Unlearning on Edge

    Maheri, M. M., Davidson, A., & Haddadi, H. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.20037

    “…knowledge (zk-SNARKs) have emerged as a promising cryptographic technique for verifying computations, particularly in deep neural network inference [1]. zk-SNARKs thus represent a potential solution by enabling edge devices (acting as provers) to demonstrate the correctness of their local…”
    Self-citation

Authors
Maheri, M. M., Haddadi, H., & Davidson, A.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
Volume
2025
Issue
4
Pages
861-880
ISSN
2299-0984 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412373325
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • UK Research and Innovation (EP/W005271/1)
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/00408/2025, 2024.07643.IACDC)
  • CHIST-ERA
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Keywords
zk-SNARKs, privacy-preserving verification, deep neural network verification, transformer models, vision transformer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review