TeleSparse: Practical Privacy-Preserving Verification of Deep Neural Networks
Open accessAbstract
Verification of the integrity of deep learning inference is crucial for understanding whether a model is being applied correctly. However, such verification typically requires access to model weights and (potentially sensitive or private) training data. So-called Zero-knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Arguments of Knowledge (ZK-SNARKs) would appear to provide the capability to verify model inference without access to such sensitive data. However, applying ZK-SNARKs to modern neural networks, such as transformers and large vision models, introduces significant computational overhead. We present TeleSparse, a ZK-friendly post-processing mechanisms to produce practical solutions to this problem. TeleSparse tackles two fundamental challenges inherent in applying ZK-SNARKs to modern neural networks: (1) Reducing circuit constraints: Over-parameterized models result in numerous constraints for ZK-SNARK verification, driving up memory and proof generation costs. We address this by applying sparsification to neural network models, enhancing proof efficiency without compromising accuracy or security. (2) Minimizing the size of lookup tables required for non-linear functions, by optimizing activation ranges through neural teleportation, a novel adaptation for narrowing activation functions' range. TeleSparse reduces prover memory usage by 67% and proof generation time by 46% on the same model, with an accuracy trade-off of approximately 1%. We implement our framework using the Halo2 proving system and demonstrate its effectiveness across multiple architectures (Vision-transformer, ResNet, MobileNet) and datasets (ImageNet,CIFAR-10,CIFAR-100). This work opens new directions for ZK-friendly model design, moving toward scalable, resource-efficient verifiable deep learning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
zk-SNARKs have emerged as a promising cryptographic technique for verifying computations, particularly in deep neural network inference.
“Recently, zero-knowledge succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (zk-SNARKs) have emerged as a promising cryptographic technique for verifying computations, particularly in deep neural network inference [1].”
From Verifiable Unlearning on Edge (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Maheri, M. M., Davidson, A., & Haddadi, H. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.20037
“…knowledge (zk-SNARKs) have emerged as a promising cryptographic technique for verifying computations, particularly in deep neural network inference [1]. zk-SNARKs thus represent a potential solution by enabling edge devices (acting as provers) to demonstrate the correctness of their local…”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Maheri, M. M., Haddadi, H., & Davidson, A.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- University of Lisbon (PT)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- Volume
- 2025
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 861-880
- ISSN
- 2299-0984 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2504.19274
- OpenAlex
- W4412373325
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- UK Research and Innovation (EP/W005271/1)
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/00408/2025, 2024.07643.IACDC)
- CHIST-ERA
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
- Keywords
- zk-SNARKs, privacy-preserving verification, deep neural network verification, transformer models, vision transformer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review