The DOI matches its DataCite record.
ReXGradient-160K: A Large-Scale Publicly Available Dataset of Chest Radiographs with Free-text Reports
Open accessAbstract
We present ReXGradient-160K, representing the largest publicly available chest X-ray dataset to date in terms of the number of patients. This dataset contains 160,000 chest X-ray studies with paired radiological reports from 109,487 unique patients across 3 U.S. health systems (79 medical sites). This comprehensive dataset includes multiple images per study and detailed radiology reports, making it particularly valuable for the development and evaluation of AI systems for medical imaging and automated report generation models. The dataset is divided into training (140,000 studies), validation (10,000 studies), and public test (10,000 studies) sets, with an additional private test set (10,000 studies) reserved for model evaluation on the ReXrank benchmark. By providing this extensive dataset, we aim to accelerate research in medical imaging AI and advance the state-of-the-art in automated radiological analysis. Our dataset will be open-sourced at https://huggingface.co/datasets/rajpurkarlab/ReXGradient-160K.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Shruthi Bannur, Kenza Bouzid, Daniel C Castro, Anton Schwaighofer, Sam Bond-Taylor, Maximilian Ilse, Fernando Pérez-García, Valentina Salvatelli, Harshita Sharma, Felix Meissen, et al. Maira-2: Grounded radiology report generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.04449 , 2024. · arXiv
- Pierre Chambon, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Thomas Sounack, Shih-Cheng Huang, Zhihong Chen, Maya Varma, Steven QH Truong, Chu The Chuong, and Curtis P Langlotz. Chexpert plus: Hundreds of thousands of aligned radiology texts, images and patients. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19538 , 2024. · arXiv
- Dina Demner-Fushman, Marc D Kohli, Marc B Rosenman, Sonya E Shooshan, Laritza Rodriguez, Sameer Antani, George R Thoma, and Clement J McDonald. Preparing a collection of radiology examinations for distribution and retrieval. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association , 23(2):304-310, 2016.
- Alistair EW Johnson, Tom J Pollard, Seth J Berkowitz, Nathaniel R Greenbaum, Matthew P Lungren, Chih-ying Deng, Roger G Mark, and Steven Horng. Mimic-cxr, a de-identified publicly available database of chest radiographs with free-text reports. Scientific data , 6(1):317, 2019.
- Chantal Pellegrini, Ege Özsoy, Benjamin Busam, Nassir Navab, and Matthias Keicher. Radialog: A large vision-language model for radiology report generation and conversational assistance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.18681 , 2023. · arXiv
- Agustina Saenz, Emma Chen, Henrik Marklund, and Pranav Rajpurkar. The maida initiative: establishing a framework for global medical-imaging data sharing. The Lancet Digital Health , 6(1): e6-e8, 2024.
- Tim Tanida, Philip Müller, Georgios Kaissis, and Daniel Rueckert. Interactive and explainable regionguided radiology report generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 7433-7442, 2023.
- Xiaoman Zhang, Hong-Yu Zhou, Xiaoli Yang, Oishi Banerjee, Julián N Acosta, Josh Miller, Ouwen Huang, and Pranav Rajpurkar. Rexrank: A public leaderboard for ai-powered radiology report generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15122 , 2024. · arXiv
- Hong-Yu Zhou, Subathra Adithan, Julián Nicolás Acosta, Eric J Topol, and Pranav Rajpurkar. A generalist learner for multifaceted medical image interpretation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.07988 , 2024. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
CRIMSON: A Clinically-Grounded LLM-Based Metric for Generative Radiology Report Evaluation
Baharoon, M., Heintz, T., Raissi, S., Alabbad, M., Alhammad, M., AlOmaish, H., Kim, S. E., Banerjee, O., & Rajpurkar, P. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.06183 · Cited by 2
“To directly assess preference alignment, we introduce RadPref, a benchmark of 100 cases, each containing a reference report from ReXGradient-160K [26] and two candidate reports randomly generated using diverse regimes inspired by [15]: report generation with MedGemma [17], randomly sampled reports,…”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, X., Acosta, J. N., Miller, J., Huang, O., & Rajpurkar, P.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2505.00228
- OpenAlex
- W6891884690
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
- Keywords
- chest radiography, radiology reports, automated reporting, medical imaging AI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
