CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1Pulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchNuclear physics research studiesNeutrino Physics Research

Bayesian inferences on covariant density functionals from multimessenger astrophysical data: The impacts of likelihood functions of low density matter constraints

Open access
Li, Jia-Jie, Sedrakian, Armen·2025·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2505.00911arXiv 2505.00911

Preprint — published as 10.1103/physrevc.112.015802

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We systematically investigate how the choice between Gaussian and uniform likelihood functions in Bayesian inference affects the inferred bulk properties of compact stars and nuclear matter within covariant density functional-based equations of state. To enable direct comparison between the two approaches, we designed the uniform likelihood function with a Gaussian-equivalent normalization factor and marginalization behavior. Across three representative astrophysical scenarios, both approaches yield nearly identical mass-radius relations, density-pressure relations, and overlapping 95.4\% confidence level regions. Although our inference analysis is carried out using parameters of the density functional, we subsequently determine the associated nuclear matter characteristic coefficients derived from the Taylor expansion of the energy density around the saturation density. We observe significant variation in the predicted isoscalar channel coefficients (e.g., the nuclear incompressibility) across different astrophysical scenarios, while the isovector channel (e.g., the slope of symmetry energy) exhibits only minimal variation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2505.00911

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SAMEP protocol enables semantically searchable, encrypted memory that can be shared among agents, including the ability to search over encrypted indices without compromising privacy.

    “The author suggests a protocol which enables semantically searchable, encrypted memory that can be shared among agents, including the ability to search over encrypted indices without compromising privacy.”

    From Memory Fabric for Conversational AI Agents: Enabling Shared and Persistent Memory Across Users (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Introduction (p. 2) describes a study of nuclear-matter equations of state and Bayesian likelihood functions, while the low-density constraints section (p. 3) discusses Gaussian priors. Searches for SAMEP, semantically searchable encrypted memory, and encrypted indices found no passage addressing the claimed protocol or its privacy properties. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Specialized privacy-preserving protocols are necessitated for memory exchange, as noted in SAMEP protocol.

    “This necessitates specialized privacypreserving protocols for memory exchange, as noted in Masoor et al.'s SAMEP protocol (2025) [31].”

    From Memory Fabric for Conversational AI Agents: Enabling Shared and Persistent Memory Across Users (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Introduction (p. 1) discusses Bayesian inference for nuclear-matter equations of state, and the low-density constraints section (p. 3) discusses statistical likelihoods. Searches for SAMEP, Masoor, memory exchange, and privacy-preserving protocols found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 87

  1. [3]G. Raaijmakers, S. K. Greif, T. E. Riley, et al. , Constraining the dense matter equation of state with joint analysis of NICER and LIGO / Virgo measurements, Astrophys. J. Lett. 893 , L21 (2020), arXiv:1912.11031 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  2. [4]I. Legred, K. Chatziioannou, R. Essick, S. Han, and P. Landry, Impact of the PSR J0740 + 6620 radius constraint on the properties of high-density matter, Phys. Rev. D 104 , 063003 (2021), arXiv:2106.05313 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  3. [5]P. T. H. Pang, I. Tews, M. W. Coughlin, et al. , Nuclear Physics Multimessenger Astrophysics Constraints on the Neutron Star Equation of State: Adding NICER's PSR J0740 + 6620 Measurement, Astrophys. J. 922 , 14 (2021), arXiv:2105.08688 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  4. [6]S. Altiparmak, C. Ecker, and L. Rezzolla, On the Sound Speed in Neutron Stars, Astrophys. J. Lett. 939 , L34 (2022), arXiv:2203.14974 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  5. [7]E. Annala, T. Gorda, E. Katerini, A. Kurkela, J. N¨ attil¨ a, V. Paschalidis, and A. Vuorinen, Multimessenger Constraints for Ultradense Matter, Phys. Rev. X 12 , 011058 (2022), arXiv:2105.05132 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  6. [8]E. Annala, T. Gorda, J. Hirvonen, O. Komoltsev, A. Kurkela, J. N¨ attil¨ a, and A. Vuorinen, Strongly interacting matter exhibits deconfined behavior in massive neutron stars, Nat. Commun. 14 , 8451 (2023), arXiv:2303.11356 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  7. [9]E. V. Chimanski, R. V. Lobato, A. R. Goncalves, and C. A. Bertulani, Bayesian Exploration of Phenomenological EoS of Neutron / Hybrid Stars with Recent Observations, Parti. 6 , 198 (2023), arXiv:2205.01174 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  8. Measurements and New Chiral Effective Field Theory Inputs, Astrophys. J. Lett. 971 , L19 (2024), arXiv:2407.06790 [astroph.HE]. · arXiv
  9. [11]Y.-Z. Fan, M.-Z. Han, J.-L. Jiang, D.-S. Shao, and S.-P. Tang, Maximum gravitational mass M TOV = 2 . 25 + 0 . 08 -0 . 07 M ⊙ inferred at about 3% precision with multimessenger data of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 109 , 043052 (2024), arXiv:2309.12644 [astroph.HE]. · arXiv
  10. [12]J. Margueron, R. Hoffmann Casali, and F. Gulminelli, Equation of state for dense nucleonic matter from metamodeling. II. Predictions for neutron star properties, Phys. Rev. C 97 , 025806 (2018), arXiv:1708.06895 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  11. [13]J. Margueron and F. Gulminelli, Effect of high-order empirical parameters on the nuclear equation of state, Phys. Rev. C 99 , 025806 (2019), arXiv:1807.01729 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  12. [14]N.-B. Zhang and B.-A. Li, GW190814's Secondary Component with Mass 2.50-2.67 M ⊙ as a Superfast Pulsar, Astrophys. J. 902 , 38 (2020), arXiv:2007.02513 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  13. [15]C. Y. Tsang, M. B. Tsang, W. G. Lynch, R. Kumar, and C. J. Horowitz, Determination of the equation of state from nuclear experiments and neutron star observations, Nat. Astron. 8 , 328 (2024), arXiv:2310.11588 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  14. [16]C. Mondal and F. Gulminelli, Nucleonic metamodeling in light of multimessenger, PREX-II, and CREX data, Phys. Rev. C 107 , 015801 (2023), arXiv:2209.05177 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  15. [17]J. Zhou, J. Xu, and P. Papakonstantinou, Bayesian inference of neutron-star observables based on effective nuclear interactions, Phys. Rev. C 107 , 055803 (2023), arXiv:2301.07904 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  16. [18]M. V. Beznogov and A. R. Raduta, Bayesian Survey of the Dense Matter Equation of State Built upon Skyrme Effective Interactions, Astrophys. J. 966 , 216 (2024), arXiv:2308.15351 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  17. [19]M. V. Beznogov and A. R. Raduta, Bayesian inference of the dense matter equation of state built upon extended Skyrme interactions, Phys. Rev. C 110 , 035805 (2024), arXiv:2403.19325 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  18. [20]S. Traversi, P. Char, and G. Pagliara, Bayesian Inference of Dense Matter Equation of State within Relativistic Mean Field Models using Astrophysical Measurements, Astrophys. J. 897 , 165 (2020), arXiv:2002.08951 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  19. [21]T. Malik, M. Ferreira, B. K. Agrawal, and C. Providˆ encia, Relativistic Description of Dense Matter Equation of State and Compatibility with Neutron Star Observables: A Bayesian Approach, Astrophys. J. 930 , 17 (2022), arXiv:2201.12552 [nuclth]. · arXiv
  20. [22]T. Malik, B. K. Agrawal, and C. Providˆ encia, Inferring the nuclear symmetry energy at suprasaturation density from neutrino cooling, Phys. Rev. C 106 , L042801 (2022), arXiv:2206.15404 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  21. [23]Z. Zhu, A. Li, and T. Liu, A Bayesian Inference of a Relativistic Mean-field Model of Neutron Star Matter from Observations of NICER and GW170817 / AT2017gfo, Astrophys. J. 943 , 163 (2023), arXiv:2211.02007 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  22. [24]M. V. Beznogov and A. R. Raduta, Bayesian inference of the dense matter equation of state built upon covariant density functionals, Phys. Rev. C 107 , 045803 (2023), arXiv:2212.07168 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  23. [25]T. Malik, M. Ferreira, M. B. Albino, and C. Providˆ encia, Spanning the full range of neutron star properties within a microscopic description, Phys. Rev. D 107 , 103018 (2023), arXiv:2301.08169 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  24. [26]M. Salinas and J. Piekarewicz, Bayesian refinement of covariant energy density functionals, Phys. Rev. C 107 , 045802 (2023), arXiv:2301.09692 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  25. [27]C. Providˆ encia, T. Malik, M. B. Albino, and M. Ferreira, Neutron star equation of state: identifying hadronic matter characteristics, arXiv , 2307.05086 (2023), arXiv:2307.05086 [nuclth]. · arXiv
  26. [28]P. Char, C. Mondal, F. Gulminelli, and M. Oertel, Generalized description of neutron star matter with a nucleonic relativistic density functional, Phys. Rev. D 108 , 103045 (2023), arXiv:2307.12364 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  27. [29]C. Huang, G. Raaijmakers, A. L. Watts, L. Tolos, and C. Providˆ encia, Constraining a relativistic mean field model using neutron star mass-radius measurements I: nucleonic models, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 529 , 4650 (2024), arXiv:2303.17518 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  28. [30]L. Scurto, H. Pais, and F. Gulminelli, General predictions of neutron star properties using unified relativistic meanfield equations of state, Phys. Rev. D 109 , 103015 (2024), arXiv:2402.15548 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  29. [31]J.-J. Li, Y . Tian, and A. Sedrakian, Bayesian constraints on covariant density functional equations of state of compact stars with new NICER mass-radius measurements, Phys. Lett. B 865 , 139501 (2025), arXiv:2412.16513 [hep-ph]. · arXiv
  30. [32]P. Char and C. Mondal, Exploring the limits of nucleonic metamodeling using different relativistic density functionals, Phys. Rev. D 111 , 103024 (2025), arXiv:2502.04211 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  31. [33]J.-J. Li, Y . Tian, and A. Sedrakian, Bayesian inferences on covariant density functionals from multimessenger astrophysical data: Nucleonic models, Phys. Rev. C 111 , 055804 (2025), arXiv:2502.20000 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  32. [35]T. Niksic, D. Vretenar, and P. Ring, Relativistic Nuclear Energy Density Functionals: Mean-Field and Beyond, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 66 , 519 (2011), arXiv:1102.4193 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  33. [36]M. Oertel, M. Hempel, T. Kl¨ ahn, and S. Typel, Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 , 015007 (2017), arXiv:1610.03361 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  34. [37]J. Yang and J. Piekarewicz, Covariant Density Functional Theory in Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70 , 21 (2020), arXiv:1912.11112 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  35. [38]A. Sedrakian, J. J. Li, and F. Weber, Heavy baryons in compact stars, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 131 , 104041 (2023), arXiv:2212.01086 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  36. [39]K. Hebeler, J. M. Lattimer, C. J. Pethick, and A. Schwenk, Equation of state and neutron star properties constrained by nuclear physics and observation, Astrophys. J. 773 , 11 (2013), arXiv:1303.4662 [astro-ph.SR]. · arXiv
  37. [40]J. E. Lynn, I. Tews, J. Carlson, S. Gandolfi, A. Gezerlis, K. E. Schmidt, and A. Schwenk, Chiral Three-Nucleon Interactions in Light Nuclei, Neutronα Scattering, and Neutron Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 , 062501 (2016), arXiv:1509.03470 [nuclth]. · arXiv
  38. [41]C. Drischler, K. Hebeler, and A. Schwenk, Chiral interactions up to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order and nuclear saturation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 , 042501 (2019), arXiv:1710.08220 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  39. [42]S. Huth, C. Wellenhofer, and A. Schwenk, New equations of state constrained by nuclear physics, observations, and QCD calculations of high-density nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. C 103 , 025803 (2021), arXiv:2009.08885 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  40. [45]M. Dutra, O. Lourenc ¸o, S. S. Avancini, et al. , Relativistic Mean-Field Hadronic Models under Nuclear Matter Constraints, Phys. Rev. C 90 , 055203 (2014), arXiv:1405.3633 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  41. [46]B. Sun, S. Bhattiprolu, and J. M. Lattimer, Compiled properties of nucleonic matter and nuclear and neutron star models from nonrelativistic and relativistic interactions, Phys. Rev. C 109 , 055801 (2024), arXiv:2311.00843 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  42. [48]B. G. Todd-Rutel and J. Piekarewicz, Neutron-Rich Nuclei and Neutron Stars: A New Accurately Calibrated Interaction for the Study of Neutron-Rich Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 , 122501 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th / 0504034.
  43. [50]U. Garg and G. Col` o, The compression-mode giant resonances and nuclear incompressibility, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 101 , 55 (2018), arXiv:1801.03672 [nucl-ex]. · arXiv
  44. [51]E. Litvinova, Relativistic approach to the nuclear breathing mode, Phys. Rev. C 107 , L041302 (2023), arXiv:2212.14766 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  45. [52]Z. Z. Li, Y. F. Niu, and G. Col` o, Toward a Unified Description of Isoscalar Giant Monopole Resonances in a Self-Consistent Quasiparticle-Vibration Coupling Approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 , 082501 (2023), arXiv:2211.01264 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  46. [53]A. Le F` evre, Y . Leifels, W. Reisdorf, J. Aichelin, and C. Hartnack, Constraining the nuclear matter equation of state around twice saturation density, Nucl. Phys. A 945 , 112 (2016), arXiv:1501.05246 [nucl-ex]. · arXiv
  47. [54]P. Danielewicz, R. Lacey, and W. G. Lynch, Determination of the equation of state of dense matter, Science 298 , 1592 (2002), arXiv:nucl-th / 0208016.
  48. [55]C. Fuchs, A. Faessler, E. Zabrodin, and Y.-M. Zheng, Probing the nuclear equation of state by K + production in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 , 1974 (2001), arXiv:nuclth / 0011102.
  49. [56]C. Hartnack, H. Oeschler, and J. Aichelin, Hadronic matter is soft, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 , 012302 (2006), arXiv:nuclth / 0506087.
  50. [57]Y. Wang, C. Guo, Q. Li, A. Le F` evre, Y. Leifels, and W. Trautmann, Determination of the nuclear incompressibility from the rapidity-dependent elliptic flow in heavy-ion collisions at beam energies 0.4 A-1.0 A GeV, Phys. Lett. B 778 , 207 (2018), arXiv:1804.04293 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  51. [58]D. Oliinychenko, A. Sorensen, V. Koch, and L. McLerran, Sensitivity of Au + Au collisions to the symmetric nuclear matter equation of state at 2-5 nuclear saturation densities, Phys. Rev. C 108 , 034908 (2023), arXiv:2208.11996 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  52. [59]P. Russotto, P. Z. Wu, M. Zoric, et al. , Symmetry energy from elliptic flow in 197 Au + 197 Au, Phys. Lett. B 697 , 471 (2011), arXiv:1101.2361 [nucl-ex]. · arXiv
  53. [60]P. Russotto, S. Gannon, S. Kupny, et al. , Results of the ASY-EOS experiment at GSI: The symmetry energy at suprasaturation density, Phys. Rev. C 94 , 034608 (2016), arXiv:1608.04332 [nucl-ex]. · arXiv
  54. [61]D. Adhikari, H. Albataineh, D. Androic, et al. (PREX), Accurate Determination of the Neutron Skin Thickness of 208 Pb through Parity-Violation in Electron Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 , 172502 (2021), arXiv:2102.10767 [nucl-ex]. · arXiv
  55. [62]D. Adhikari, H. Albataineh, D. Androic, et al. (CREX), Precision Determination of the Neutral Weak Form Factor of Ca48, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 , 042501 (2022), arXiv:2205.11593 [nuclex]. · arXiv
  56. [63]B. T. Reed, F. J. Fattoyev, C. J. Horowitz, and J. Piekarewicz, Implications of PREX-2 on the Equation of State of Neutron-Rich Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 , 172503 (2021), arXiv:2101.03193 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  57. [64]P.-G. Reinhard, X. Roca-Maza, and W. Nazarewicz, Information Content of the Parity-Violating Asymmetry in Pb208, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 , 232501 (2021), arXiv:2105.15050 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  58. [65]R. Essick, P. Landry, A. Schwenk, and I. Tews, Detailed examination of astrophysical constraints on the symmetry energy and the neutron skin of Pb208 with minimal modeling assumptions, Phys. Rev. C 104 , 065804 (2021), arXiv:2107.05528 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  59. [66]J. Estee, W. G. Lynch, C. Y. Tsang, et al. (SpiRIT), Probing the Symmetry Energy with the Spectral Pion Ratio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 , 162701 (2021), arXiv:2103.06861 [nucl-ex]. · arXiv
  60. [67]J. M. Lattimer, Constraints on Nuclear Symmetry Energy Parameters, Particles 6 , 30 (2023), arXiv:2301.03666 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  61. [68]G. Giacalone, G. Nijs, and W. van der Schee, Determination of the Neutron Skin of Pb208 from Ultrarelativistic Nuclear Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 , 202302 (2023), arXiv:2305.00015 · arXiv
  62. [69]J. Margueron, R. Hoffmann Casali, and F. Gulminelli, Equation of state for dense nucleonic matter from metamodeling. I. Foundational aspects, Phys. Rev. C 97 , 025805 (2018), arXiv:1708.06894 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  63. [70]J. J. Li, W. H. Long, J. Margueron, and N. Van Giai, Superheavy magic structures in the relativistic Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov approach, Phys. Lett. B 732 , 169 (2014), arXiv:1303.2765 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  64. [71]J. J. Li and A. Sedrakian, Constraining compact star properties with nuclear saturation parameters, Phys. Rev. C 100 , 015809 (2019), arXiv:1903.06057 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  65. [72]J. J. Li and A. Sedrakian, Implications from GW170817 for ∆ -isobar Admixed Hypernuclear Compact Stars, Astrophys. J. Lett. 874 , L22 (2019), arXiv:1904.02006 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  66. [73]J. J. Li and A. Sedrakian, New Covariant Density Functionals of Nuclear Matter for Compact Star Simulations, Astrophys. J. 957 , 41 (2023), arXiv:2308.14457 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  67. [74]S. Huth, P. T. H. Pang, I. Tews, et al. , Constraining Neutron-Star Matter with Microscopic and Macroscopic Collisions, Nature 606 , 276 (2022), arXiv:2107.06229 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  68. [75]J. Antoniadis, P. C. C. Freire, N. Wex, et al. , A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary, Science 340 , 6131 (2013), arXiv:1304.6875 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  69. [76]B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 , 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]. · arXiv
  70. [77]B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbot, et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Properties of the binary neutron star merger GW170817, Phys. Rev. X 9 , 011001 (2019), arXiv:1805.11579 [gr-qc]. · arXiv
  71. [78]B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass ∼ 3 . 4 M ⊙ , Astrophys. J. Lett. 892 , L3 (2020), arXiv:2001.01761 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  72. [79]F. Hernandez Vivanco, R. Smith, E. Thrane, and P. D. Lasky, A scalable random forest regressor for combining neutron-star equation of state measurements: A case study with GW170817 and GW190425, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 499 , 5972 (2020), arXiv:2008.05627 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  73. [80]T. Salmi, D. Choudhury, Y. Kini, et al. , The Radius of the Highmass Pulsar PSR J0740 + 6620 with 3.6 yr of NICER Data, Astrophys. J. 974 , 294 (2024), arXiv:2406.14466 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  74. [81]S. Vinciguerra, T. Salmi, A. L. Watts, et al. , An Updated Mass-Radius Analysis of the 2017-2018 NICER Data Set of PSR J0030 + 0451, Astrophys. J. 961 , 62 (2024), arXiv:2308.09469 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  75. [82]D. Choudhury, T. Salmi, S. Vinciguerra, et al. , A NICER View of the Nearest and Brightest Millisecond Pulsar: PSR J0437-4715, Astrophys. J. Lett. 971 , L20 (2024), arXiv:2407.06789 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  76. [83]T. Salmi, J. S. Deneva, P. S. Ray, et al. , A NICER View of PSR J1231-1411: A Complex Case, Astrophys. J. 976 , 58 (2024), arXiv:2409.14923 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  77. [84]T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, S. Bogdanov, et al. , A NICER View of PSR J0030 + 0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation, Astrophys. J. Lett. 887 , L21 (2019), arXiv:1912.05702 [astroph.HE]. · arXiv
  78. [85]T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, P. S. Ray, et al. , A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740 + 6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy, Astrophys. J. Lett. 918 , L27 (2021), arXiv:2105.06980 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  79. [86]M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, et al. , PSR J0030 + 0451 Mass and Radius from NICER Data and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter, Astrophys. J. Lett. 887 , L24 (2019), arXiv:1912.05705 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  80. [87]M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, et al. , The Radius of PSR J0740 + 6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data, Astrophys. J. Lett. 918 , L28 (2021), arXiv:2105.06979 [astroph.HE]. · arXiv
  81. [88]R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object, Astrophys. J. Lett. 896 , L44 (2020), arXiv:2006.12611 [astro-ph.HE]. · arXiv
  82. [89]Y. Fujimoto, K. Fukushima, L. D. McLerran, and M. Praszalowicz, Trace Anomaly as Signature of Conformality in Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 , 252702 (2022), arXiv:2207.06753 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  83. [90]D. Klahn, T. Blaschke, S. Typel, et al. , Constraints on the high-density nuclear equation of state from the phenomenol- ogy of compact stars and heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 74 , 035802 (2006), arXiv:nucl-th / 0602038.
  84. [93]J. J. Li, W. H. Long, and A. Sedrakian, Hypernuclear stars from relativistic Hartree-Fock density functional theory, Eur. Phys. J. A 54 , 133 (2018), arXiv:1801.07084 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  85. [94]J. J. Li and A. Sedrakian, Baryonic models of ultra-low-mass compact stars for the central compact object in HESS J1731347, Phys. Lett. B 844 , 138062 (2023), arXiv:2306.14185 [nucl-th]. · arXiv
  86. [95]C. J. Horowitz and J. Piekarewicz, Neutron star structure and the neutron radius of Pb-208, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 , 5647 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph / 0010227.
  87. [96]W.-C. Chen and J. Piekarewicz, Building relativistic mean field models for finite nuclei and neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C 90 , 044305 (2014), arXiv:1408.4159 [nucl-th]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, J.-J., & Sedrakian, A.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2505.00911
arXiv
2505.00911
OpenAlex
W6929363252
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Neutrino Physics Research
Keywords
equation of state, compact stars, nuclear matter, likelihood function, Gaussian likelihood, mass-radius relation, nuclear incompressibility, nuclear symmetry energy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review