The DOI matches its DataCite record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DanceGRPO: Unleashing GRPO on Visual Generation
Abstract
Recent advances in generative AI have revolutionized visual content creation, yet aligning model outputs with human preferences remains a critical challenge. While Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a promising approach for fine-tuning generative models, existing methods like DDPO and DPOK face fundamental limitations - particularly their inability to maintain stable optimization when scaling to large and diverse prompt sets, severely restricting their practical utility. This paper presents DanceGRPO, a framework that addresses these limitations through an innovative adaptation of Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) for visual generation tasks. Our key insight is that GRPO's inherent stability mechanisms uniquely position it to overcome the optimization challenges that plague prior RL-based approaches on visual generation. DanceGRPO establishes several significant advances: First, it demonstrates consistent and stable policy optimization across multiple modern generative paradigms, including both diffusion models and rectified flows. Second, it maintains robust performance when scaling to complex, real-world scenarios encompassing three key tasks and four foundation models. Third, it shows remarkable versatility in optimizing for diverse human preferences as captured by five distinct reward models assessing image/video aesthetics, text-image alignment, video motion quality, and binary feedback. Our comprehensive experiments reveal that DanceGRPO outperforms baseline methods by up to 181\% across multiple established benchmarks, including HPS-v2.1, CLIP Score, VideoAlign, and GenEval. Our results establish DanceGRPO as a robust and versatile solution for scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) tasks in visual generation, offering new insights into harmonizing reinforcement learning and visual synthesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Key examples include DanceGRPO (Xue et al., 2025), GAPO (Zhu et al., 2025a), GRADEO (Mou et al., 2025), InfLVG (Fang et al., 2025b), Phys-AR (Lin et al., 2025c), VideoReward (Liu et al., 2025e), TeViR (Chen et al., 2025i), and InstructVideo (Yuan et al., 2024).”
From The landscape of agentic reinforcement learning for LLMs: a survey (2025) · cites this paper as Xue et al., 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models
Song, J., Meng, C., & Ermon, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.02502 · Cited by 2,507
Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations
Song, Y., Sohl-Dickstein, J., Kingma, D. P., Kumar, A., Ermon, S., & Poole, B. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.13456 · Cited by 1,953
SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis
Podell, D., English, Z., Lacey, K., Blattmann, A., Dockhorn, T., Müller, J., Penna, J., & Rombach, R. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.01952 · Cited by 455
Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow
Liu, X., Gong, C., & Liu, Q. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.03003 · Cited by 124
RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback
Lee, H., Phatale, S., Mansoor, H., Mesnard, T., Ferret, J., Lu, K., Bishop, C., Hall, E., Carbune, V., Rastogi, A., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.00267 · Cited by 87
VidProM: A Million-scale Real Prompt-Gallery Dataset for Text-to-Video Diffusion Models
Wang, W., & Yang, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.06098 · Cited by 26
Liang, Z., Yuan, Y., Gu, S., Chen, B., Hang, T., Cheng, M., Li, J., & Zheng, L. (2025) · 2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.01232 · Cited by 11
Cited by
The landscape of agentic reinforcement learning for LLMs: a survey
Zhang, G., Geng, H., Yu, X., Yin, Z., Zhang, Z., Tan, Z., Zhou, H., Li, Z., Xue, X., Li, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.02547 · Cited by 229
Wang, S., Yu, L., Gao, C., Zheng, C., Liu, S., Lu, R., Dang, K., Chen, X., Yang, J., Zhang, Z., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.01939 · Cited by 14
“%) on the training dataset (i.e., DAPO-MATH-17K (Yu et al., 2025)) and often generates responses with repetitive words early in the RL training process.”
InfluentialOmniGen2: Towards Instruction-Aligned Multimodal Generation
Wu, C., Zheng, P., Yan, R., Xiao, S., Luo, X., Wang, Y., Li, W., Jiang, X., Liu, Y., Zhou, J., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.18871
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Xue, Z., Wu, J., Gao, Y., Kong, F., Zhu, L., Chen, M., Liu, Z., Liu, W., Guo, Q., Huang, W., & Luo, P.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- arXiv
- 2505.07818
- References
- 7
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.