$μ$PC: Scaling Predictive Coding to 100+ Layer Networks
Open accessAbstract
The biological implausibility of backpropagation (BP) has motivated many alternative, brain-inspired algorithms that attempt to rely only on local information, such as predictive coding (PC) and equilibrium propagation. However, these algorithms have notoriously struggled to train very deep networks, preventing them from competing with BP in large-scale settings. Indeed, scaling PC networks (PCNs) has recently been posed as a challenge for the community (Pinchetti et al., 2024). Here, we show that 100+ layer PCNs can be trained reliably using a Depth-$μ$P parameterisation (Yang et al., 2023; Bordelon et al., 2023) which we call "$μ$PC". By analysing the scaling behaviour of PCNs, we reveal several pathologies that make standard PCNs difficult to train at large depths. We then show that, despite addressing only some of these instabilities, $μ$PC allows stable training of very deep (up to 128-layer) residual networks on simple classification tasks with competitive performance and little tuning compared to current benchmarks. Moreover, $μ$PC enables zero-shot transfer of both weight and activity learning rates across widths and depths. Our results serve as a first step towards scaling PC to more complex architectures and have implications for other local algorithms. Code for $μ$PC is made available as part of a JAX library for PCNs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Proposed solutions to predictive coding's scaling problem still require automatic differentiation or global signal propagation.
“Solutions have been proposed to circumvent this problem [Qi et al., 2025, Innocenti et al., 2025, Goemaere et al., 2025], but they still require automatic differentiation or global signal propagation.”
From Closed-form predictive coding via hierarchical Gaussian filters (2026) · cites this paper as Innocenti et al., 2025
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Closed-form predictive coding via hierarchical Gaussian filters
Baskakovs, A., Estebe, S., Enevoldsen, K., Nielbo, K., Mathys, C., & Legrand, N. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.20293
“Recent depth-scaling proposals such as ePC [Goemaere et al., 2025] and µ PC [Innocenti et al., 2025] address related concerns through complementary mechanisms whose design choices lie outside this regime.”
- Authors
- Innocenti, F., Achour, E. M., & Buckley, C. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- RWTH Aachen University (DE)
- VERSES (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2505.13124
- OpenAlex
- W4416975473
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1481, 442047500)
- HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council (101070940)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- predictive coding, depth scaling, brain-inspired learning, ResNet, zero-shot transfer, training stability, backpropagation alternatives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review