The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ViDoRe Benchmark V2: Raising the Bar for Visual Retrieval
Open accessAbstract
The ViDoRe Benchmark V1 was approaching saturation with top models exceeding 90% nDCG@5, limiting its ability to discern improvements. ViDoRe Benchmark V2 introduces realistic, challenging retrieval scenarios via blind contextual querying, long and cross-document queries, and a hybrid synthetic and human-in-the-loop query generation process. It comprises four diverse, multilingual datasets and provides clear evaluation instructions. Initial results demonstrate substantial room for advancement and highlight insights on model generalization and multilingual capability. This benchmark is designed as a living resource, inviting community contributions to maintain relevance through future evaluations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Spike hijack rates reach approximately 0.70 for both MaxSim and Top𝑘 , meaning most query tokens select injected distractors.”
From Spike Hijacking in Late-Interaction Retrieval (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Even at moderate injection levels ( 𝐾 = 100 ), MaxSim and Top-4 retain only 27.8% and 29.3% of baseline recall respectively, while Softmax retains 67.6%.”
From Spike Hijacking in Late-Interaction Retrieval (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Nicolas Boizard, Hippolyte Gisserot-Boukhlef, Duarte M. Alves, André Martins, Ayoub Hammal, Caio Corro, Céline Hudelot, Emmanuel Malherbe, Etienne Malaboeuf, Fanny Jourdan, Gabriel Hautreux, João Alves, Kevin El-Haddad, Manuel Faysse, Maxime Peyrard, Nuno M. Guerreiro, Patrick Fernandes, Ricardo Rei, and Pierre Colombo. Eurobert: Scaling multilingual encoders for european languages, 2025. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2503.05500.
- Manuel Faysse, Hugues Sibille, Tony Wu, Bilel Omrani, Gautier Viaud, Céline Hudelot, and Pierre Colombo. Colpali: Efficient document retrieval with vision language models, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01449. · arXiv
- Hippolyte Gisserot-Boukhlef, Manuel Faysse, Emmanuel Malherbe, Céline Hudelot, and Pierre Colombo. Towards trustworthy reranking: A simple yet effective abstention mechanism, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12997. · arXiv
- Xueguang Ma, Sheng-Chieh Lin, Minghan Li, Wenhu Chen, and Jimmy Lin. Unify- ing multimodal retrieval via document screenshot embedding, 2024. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2406.11251.
- Nandan Thakur, Jimmy Lin, Sam Havens, Michael Carbin, Omar Khattab, and Andrew Drozdov. Freshstack: Building realistic benchmarks for evaluating retrieval on technical documents, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13128. · arXiv
- An Yang, Bowen Yu, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Haoyan Huang, Jiandong Jiang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jingren Zhou, Junyang Lin, Kai Dang, Kexin Yang, Le Yu, Mei Li, Minmin Sun, Qin Zhu, Rui Men, Tao He, Weijia Xu, Wenbiao Yin, Wenyuan Yu, Xiafei Qiu, Xingzhang Ren, Xinlong Yang, Yong Li, Zhiying Xu, and Zipeng Zhang. Qwen2.5-1m technical report, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15383. · arXiv
- Shi Yu, Chaoyue Tang, Bokai Xu, Junbo Cui, Junhao Ran, Yukun Yan, Zhenghao Liu, Shuo Wang, Xu Han, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. Visrag: Vision-based retrieval- augmented generation on multi-modality documents, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2410.10594. · arXiv
- Xin Zhang, Yanzhao Zhang, Wen Xie, Mingxin Li, Ziqi Dai, Dingkun Long, Pengjun Xie, Meishan Zhang, Wenjie Li, and Min Zhang. Gme: Improving universal multimodal retrieval by multimodal llms, 2024. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16855. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spike Hijacking in Late-Interaction Retrieval
Suresh, K., Vatsa, T., King, T., Kadav, A., & Friedrich, M. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.05253
“5 [9] on the ViDoRe biomedical benchmark [10, 11].”
Multi-Vector Index Compression in Any Modality
Qin, H., Martin, A. A., Jha, R., Zuo, C., Kriz, R., & Durme, B. V. (2026) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3805712.3809589 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Macé, Q., Loison, A., & Faysse, M.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2505.17166
- OpenAlex
- W4414689452
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (public-domain)
- Funders
- Grand Équipement National De Calcul Intensif
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- visual information retrieval, benchmark, long queries, synthetic query generation, multilingual dataset, model generalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
