The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
STEB: In Search of the Best Evaluation Approach for Synthetic Time Series
Abstract
The growing need for synthetic time series, due to data augmentation or privacy regulations, has led to numerous generative models, frameworks, and evaluation measures alike. Objectively comparing these measures on a large scale remains an open challenge. We propose the Synthetic Time series Evaluation Benchmark (STEB) -- the first benchmark framework that enables comprehensive and interpretable automated comparisons of synthetic time series evaluation measures. Using 10 diverse datasets, randomness injection, and 13 configurable data transformations, STEB computes indicators for measure reliability and score consistency. It tracks running time, test errors, and features sequential and parallel modes of operation. In our experiments, we determine a ranking of 41 measures from literature and confirm that the choice of upstream time series embedding heavily impacts the final score.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
UniMiB SHAR: A Dataset for Human Activity Recognition Using Acceleration Data from Smartphones
Micucci, D., Mobilio, M., & Napoletano, P. (2017) · doi:10.20944/preprints201706.0033.v1 · Cited by 596 · cited 1×
“UniMiB SHAR Researchers from the University of Milano-Bicocca created this mulitvariate dataset by collecting acceleration samples acquired with an Android smartphone [38].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Stenger, M., Leppich, R., Bauer, A., & Kounev, S.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- arXiv
- 2505.21160
- References
- 1
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STEB: In Search of the Best Evaluation Approach for Synthetic Time Series. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2505.21160
- The paper
- Stenger, M., Leppich, R., Bauer, A., & Kounev, S. (2025). STEB: In Search of the Best Evaluation Approach for Synthetic Time Series. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2505.21160
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
