Seed-Coder: Let the Code Model Curate Data for Itself
Open accessAbstract
Code data in large language model (LLM) pretraining is recognized crucial not only for code-related tasks but also for enhancing general intelligence of LLMs. Current open-source LLMs often heavily rely on human effort to produce their code pretraining data, such as employing hand-crafted filtering rules tailored to individual programming languages, or using human-annotated data to train quality filters. However, these approaches are inherently limited in scalability, prone to subjective biases, and costly to extend and maintain across diverse programming languages. To address these challenges, we introduce Seed-Coder, a series of open-source LLMs comprising base, instruct and reasoning models of 8B size, minimizing human involvement in data construction. Our code pretraining data is produced by a model-centric data pipeline, which predominantly leverages LLMs for scoring and filtering code data. The instruct model is further trained via supervised fine-tuning and preference optimization, and the reasoning model leverages Long-Chain-of-Thought (LongCoT) reinforcement learning to improve multi-step code reasoning. Seed-Coder achieves state-of-the-art results among open-source models of similar size and even surpasses some much larger models, demonstrating superior performance in code generation, code completion, code editing, code reasoning, and software engineering tasks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Validation with Seed-Coder-8B-Instruct yields similar results.
“We also validate with Seed-Coder-8B-Instruct (ByteDance Seed et al., 2025), obtaining similar results (see Section G).”
From SWE-Pruner: Self-Adaptive Context Pruning for Coding Agents (2026) · cites this paper as ByteDance Seed et al., 2025
LeetCode and DevEval are among the most widely adopted benchmarks for evaluating LLM code generation capabilities.
“we argue that LeetCode and DevEval are among the most widely adopted benchmarks for evaluating LLM code generation capabilities [30, 43, 66]”
From What Makes In-Context Examples Effective for Code Generation? (2026) · cites this paper as [66]
Cites
Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classification
Joulin, A., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., & Mikolov, T. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.01759 · Cited by 4,542 · cited 2×
“To further improve model performance and better align the distribution between the pretraining model and post-training data, we constructed high-quality datasets by combining the quality score with iteratively trained fastText [Joulin et al., 2016, 2017] models.”
The probabilistic relevance framework: BM25 and beyond
Robertson, S., & Zaragoza, H. (2009) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000019 · Cited by 3,374 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The context includes the pre-commit code snapshot’s README, directory structure, and top 5 relevant files retrieved via BM25 [Robertson and Zaragoza, 2009].”
Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code
Chen, M., Tworek, J., Jun, H., Yuan, Q., Pinto, H. P. D. O., Kaplan, J., Edwards, H., Burda, Y., Joseph, N., Brockman, G., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.03374 · Cited by 1,436 · cited 1× · see citing works
“HumanEval [Chen et al., 2021] consists of 164 manually written programming tasks in Python, each of which provides a function signature with a docstring for LLMs to complete a solution, whose functional correctness is judged by a handful of test cases.”
Competition-level code generation with AlphaCode
Li, Y., Choi, D., Chung, J., Kushman, N., Schrittwieser, J., Leblond, R., Eccles, T., Keeling, J., Gimeno, F., Dal Lago, A., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abq1158 · Cited by 1,043 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We collected challenging real-world coding problems, including CodeContests [Li et al., 2022] and ICPC problems 2 , and gathered model-generated solutions from DeepSeek-R1 [DeepSeek-AI et al., 2025] on these tasks.”
Whitman, N. A. (1999) · Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · doi:10.1097/00001888-199901000-00001 · Cited by 689 · cited 2×
“We believe that these limitations align with insights from the widely cited essay “The Bitter Lesson” [Sutton, 2019]: AI researchers often favor human-centric methods due to their short-term advantages, yet these approaches inevitably plateau and even inhibit long-term progress; the breakthrough…”
Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model
Rafailov, R., Sharma, A., Mitchell, E., Manning, C. D., Ermon, S., & Finn, C. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-2338 · Cited by 686 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To build Seed-Coder-8B-Instruct, we first applied supervised fine-tuning (SFT) to adapt our base models to a wide range of real-world tasks, followed by direct preference optimization (DPO; Rafailov et al. [2023]) to further enhance specific capabilities such as code generation and reasoning.”
Program Synthesis with Large Language Models
Austin, J., Odena, A., Nye, M., Bosma, M., Michalewski, H., Dohan, D., Jiang, E., Cai, C., Terry, M., Le, Q., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07732 · Cited by 388 · cited 1× · see citing works
“MBPP [Austin et al., 2021] is created by crowd-sourcing participants to write 974 Python programming problems, each of which is comprised of a function signature with a docstring, as well as a few test cases.”
Liu, J., Xia, C. S., Wang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-0943 · Cited by 384 · cited 3× · see citing works
“To rigorously benchmark the correctness of LLM-generated code, EvalPlus [Liu et al., 2023] extends the test cases of the original HumanEval by 80 × to build HumanEval + .”
InfluentialStarCoder: may the source be with you!
Li, R., Allal, L. B., Zi, Y., Muennighoff, N., Kocetkov, D., Mou, C., Marone, M., Akiki, C., Li, J., Chim, J., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.06161 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Self-citationInCoder: A Generative Model for Code Infilling and Synthesis
Fried, D., Aghajanyan, A., Lin, J., Wang, S., Wallace, E., Shi, F., Zhong, R., Yih, W.-T., Zettlemoyer, L., & Lewis, M. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.05999 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming - The Rise of Code Intelligence
Guo, D., Zhu, Q., Yang, D., Xie, Z., Dong, K., Zhang, W., Chen, G., Bi, X., Wu, Y., Li, Y. K., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.14196 · Cited by 180 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Specifically, we employed the widely adopted 10-gram filtering method [Guo et al., 2024, Hui et al., 2024], which removed all data that had any 10-gram word overlap with key benchmark datasets, including HumanEval, MBPP, MHPP, BigCodeBench, LiveCodeBench, Aider, FullStack Bench, etc.”
InfluentialSelf-citation#InsTag: Instruction Tagging for Analyzing Supervised Fine-tuning of Large Language Models
Lu, K., Yuan, H., Yuan, Z., Lin, R., Lin, J.-Y., Tan, C.-Q., Zhou, C., & Zhou, J.-R. (2023) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.07074 · Cited by 141 · cited 1×
“We first classified the topic of each instance using tagging techniques [Lu et al., 2023].”
DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model
DeepSeek-AI, Liu, A., Feng, B., Wang, B., Wang, B., Liu, B., Zhao, C., Dengr, C., Ruan, C., Dai, D., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.04434 · Cited by 109 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Although synthetic data offers an effective and cost-efficient alternative to real-13 world data [Liu et al., 2024a], it often lacks the stylistic diversity observed in actual user prompts.”
MultiPL-E: A Scalable and Polyglot Approach to Benchmarking Neural Code Generation
Cassano, F., Gouwar, J., Nguyen, D., Nguyen, S., Phipps-Costin, L., Pinckney, D., Yee, M.-H., Zi, Y., Anderson, C. J., Feldman, M. Q., et al. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2023.3267446 · Cited by 109 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Single-line MultiPL-HumanEval FIM [Allal et al., 2023] refines MultiPL-E [Cassano et al., 2023] into a set of single-line infilling challenges across Python, Java, and JavaScript, which serves as a classic benchmark for FIM evaluation.”
DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models
Shao, Z., Wang, P., Zhu, Q., Xu, R., Song, J., Bi, X., Zhang, H., Zhang, M., Li, Y. K., Wu, Y., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.03300 · Cited by 101 · cited 1× · see citing works
“During the RL training process, similar to DeepCoder [Luo et al., 2025], we used the open-source verl framework [Sheng et al., 2025] for GRPO training [Shao et al., 2024], and adopted optimization techniques similar to DAPO [Yu et al., 2025, ByteDance Seed, 2025].”
Self-citationYu, Z., Wang, Z., Fu, Y., Shi, H., Shaikh, K., & Lin, Y. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.15765 · Cited by 90 · cited 1×
“One possible explanation for this outperformance is the positional bias in attention mechanisms [Yu et al., 2024, Hsieh et al., 2024]: in SPM mode, the beginning of the suffix and the end of the prefix are positioned at opposite ends of the input token sequence, both crucial for middle-content…”
Connected Components in MapReduce and Beyond
Kiveris, R., Lattanzi, S., Mirrokni, V., Rastogi, V., & Vassilvitskii, S. (2014) · ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing · doi:10.1145/2670979.2670997 · Cited by 77 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For each level, we performed exact-deduplication using SHA256 hashes of contents and near-deduplication via the MinHash algorithm [Kiveris et al., 2014, Lee et al., 2022].”
Can It Edit? Evaluating the Ability of Large Language Models to Follow Code Editing InstructionsPreprint
Cassano, F., Li, L., Sethi, A., Shinn, N., Brennan-Jones, A., Ginesin, J., Berman, E., Chakhnashvili, G., Lozhkov, A., Anderson, C., et al. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.12450 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework
Sheng, G., Zhang, C., Ye, Z., Wu, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, R., Peng, Y., Lin, H., & Wu, C. (2025) · Proceedings of the Twentieth European Conference on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/3689031.3696075 · Cited by 74 · cited 1× · see citing works
“During the RL training process, similar to DeepCoder [Luo et al., 2025], we used the open-source verl framework [Sheng et al., 2025] for GRPO training [Shao et al., 2024], and adopted optimization techniques similar to DAPO [Yu et al., 2025, ByteDance Seed, 2025].”
StarCoder 2 and The Stack v2: The Next Generation
Lozhkov, A., Li, R., Allal, L. B., Cassano, F., Lamy-Poirier, J., Tazi, N., Tang, A., Pykhtar, D., Liu, J., Wei, Y., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.19173 · Cited by 74 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The fully upgraded version StarCoder2 consists of 3B, 7B, and 15B parameters models trained on 3.3 to 4.3 trillion tokens of the Stack v2 [Lozhkov et al., 2024], with 67.5TB code data spanning 619 programming languages.”
InfluentialSelf-citationSWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?
Jimenez, C. E., Yang, J., Wettig, A., Yao, S., Pei, K., Press, O., & Narasimhan, K. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.06770 · Cited by 72 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We evaluated Seed-Coder and competitor models on two benchmarks to assess their effectiveness in realistic software engineering scenarios: • SWE-bench Verified [Jimenez et al., 2024] is a benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of LLMs to solve real-world GitHub issues.”
SantaCoder: don't reach for the stars!
Allal, L. B., Li, R., Kocetkov, D., Mou, C., Akiki, C., Ferrandis, C. M., Muennighoff, N., Mishra, M., Gu, A., Dey, M., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.03988 · Cited by 61 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Single-line MultiPL-HumanEval FIM [Allal et al., 2023] refines MultiPL-E [Cassano et al., 2023] into a set of single-line infilling challenges across Python, Java, and JavaScript, which serves as a classic benchmark for FIM evaluation.”
InfluentialDeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence
DeepSeek-AI, Zhu, Q., Guo, D., Shao, Z., Yang, D., Wang, P., Xu, R., Wu, Y., Li, Y., Gao, H., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.11931 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationEfficient Training of Language Models to Fill in the Middle
Bavarian, M., Jun, H., Tezak, N., Schulman, J., McLeavey, C., Tworek, J., & Chen, M. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.14255 · Cited by 47 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, in contrast to the more commonly adopted PSM mode, we found that SPM performs slightly better during the training process, which is consistent with [Bavarian et al., 2022a].”
LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code
Jain, N., Han, K., Gu, A., Li, W.-D., Yan, F., Zhang, T., Wang, S., Solar-Lezama, A., Sen, K., & Stoica, I. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.07974 · Cited by 42 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To mitigate these issues, LiveCodeBench [Jain et al., 2025] introduces live updates by continuously collecting new problems from coding contests across prominent competitive programming platforms – LeetCode, AtCoder, and CodeForces – and tagging each problem with a release date.”
Multi-lingual Evaluation of Code Generation Models
Athiwaratkun, B., Gouda, S. K., Wang, Z., Li, X., Tian, Y., Tan, M., Ahmad, W. U., Wang, S., Sun, Q., Shang, M., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.14868 · Cited by 38 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The original MBPP benchmark only contains Python tasks, while MBXP [Athiwaratkun et al., 2023] transforms the problems and unit tests in MBPP to 10+ programming languages.”
CrossCodeEval: A Diverse and Multilingual Benchmark for Cross-File Code Completion
Ding, Y., Wang, Z., Ahmad, W. U., Ding, H., Tan, M., Jain, N., Ramanathan, M. K., Nallapati, R., Bhatia, P., Roth, D., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.11248 · Cited by 37 · cited 1×
“CrossCodeEval [Ding et al., 2023] is composed of single-line infilling tasks across Python, TypeScript, C# and Java.”
MHPP: Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Language Models Beyond Basic Code GenerationPreprint
Dai, J., Lu, J., Feng, Y., Zeng, G.-T., Ruan, R., Cheng, M.-M., Huang, D., Tan, H.-C., & Guo, Z. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.11430 · Cited by 35 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recently, a challenging benchmark named Mostly Hard Python Problems (MHPP) was introduced [Dai et al., 2024], consisting of 210 human-curated problems accompanied by unit tests.”
Self-citationNaturalCodeBench: Examining Coding Performance Mismatch on HumanEval and Natural User PromptsPreprint
Zhang, S.-D., Zhao, H., Liu, X., Zheng, Q., Qi, Z., Gu, X.-T., Zhang, X.-H., Dong, Y.-X., & Tang, J. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.04520 · Cited by 30 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To further improve the model’s ability to respond to real-world queries, we additionally incorporated code-related data sampled from WildChat [Zhao et al., 2024] into our SFT dataset.”
BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructions
Zhuo, T. Y., Vu, M. C., Chim, J., Hu, H., Yu, W., Widyasari, R., Yusuf, I. N. B., Zhan, H., He, J., Paul, I., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.15877 · Cited by 29 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Performance of instruct models on MBXP. tasks, the recently proposed benchmark BigCodeBench [Zhuo et al., 2025] challenges LLMs to invoke multiple function calls as tools from 139 libraries across 7 domains, encompassing 1,140 Python tasks with rich context.”
OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents
Wang, X., Li, B., Song, Y., Xu, F. F., Tang, X., Zhuge, M., Pan, J., Song, Y., Li, B., Singh, J., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.16741 · Cited by 24 · cited 1× · see citing works
“• OpenHands [Wang et al., 2025] is a fully autonomous agent platform that has no requirements of any fixed workflow.”
Self-citationDeduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Better
Lee, K., Ippolito, D., Nystrom, A., Zhang, C., Eck, D., Callison-Burch, C., & Carlini, N. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.06499 · Cited by 11 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For each level, we performed exact-deduplication using SHA256 hashes of contents and near-deduplication via the MinHash algorithm [Kiveris et al., 2014, Lee et al., 2022].”
RepoCoder: Repository-Level Code Completion Through Iterative Retrieval and Generation
Zhang, F., Chen, B., Zhang, Y., Keung, J., Liu, J., Zan, D., Mao, Y., Lou, J.-G., & Chen, W. (2023) · arXiv · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationCRUXEval: A Benchmark for Code Reasoning, Understanding and Execution
Gu, A., Rozière, B., Leather, H., Solar-Lezama, A., Synnaeve, G., & Wang, S. I. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.03065 · Cited by 7 · cited 3× · see citing works
“As introduced in Sec 5.1.3, CRUXEval [Gu et al., 2024] is designed to measure LLM’s code reasoning capability by requiring the model to predict output from a given input (CRUXEval-O), or predict the input from a given output (CRUXEval-I).”
InfluentialCodeElo: Benchmarking Competition-level Code Generation of LLMs with Human-comparable Elo Ratings
Quan, S., Yang, J., Yu, B., Zheng, B., Liu, D., Yang, A., Ren, X., Gao, B., Miao, Y., Feng, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.01257 · Cited by 5 · cited 2× · see citing works
“During the RL training process, similar to DeepCoder [Luo et al., 2025], we used the open-source verl framework [Sheng et al., 2025] for GRPO training [Shao et al., 2024], and adopted optimization techniques similar to DAPO [Yu et al., 2025, ByteDance Seed, 2025].”
Self-citationDoes Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?
Yue, Y., Chen, Z., Lu, R., Zhao, A., Wang, Z., Yue, Y., Song, S., & Huang, G. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.13837 · Cited by 3 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, as pointed out by Yue et al. [2025], a large volume of distillation data may exceed the inherent capabilities of the base model and thus fail to accurately reflect its true potential.”
FullStack Bench: Evaluating LLMs as Full Stack Coders
Bytedance-Seed-Foundation-Code-Team, :, Cheng, Y., Chen, J., Chen, J., Chen, L., Chen, L., Chen, W., Chen, Z., Geng, S., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.00535 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationFound in the Middle: Calibrating Positional Attention Bias Improves Long Context Utilization
Hsieh, C.-Y., Chuang, Y.-S., Li, C.-L., Wang, Z., Le, L. T., Kumar, A., Glass, J., Ratner, A., Lee, C.-Y., Krishna, R., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.16008 · cited 1×
“One possible explanation for this outperformance is the positional bias in attention mechanisms [Yu et al., 2024, Hsieh et al., 2024]: in SPM mode, the beginning of the suffix and the end of the prefix are positioned at opposite ends of the input token sequence, both crucial for middle-content…”
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
19 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Seed Diffusion: A Large-Scale Diffusion Language Model with High-Speed Inference
Song, Y., Zhang, Z., Luo, C., Gao, P., Xia, F., Luo, H., Li, Z., Yang, Y., Yu, H.-L., Qu, X.-W., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.02193 · Cited by 196
“Our evaluation protocols and primary baselines are adapted from [20].”
Self-citationLarge Language Models Meet NLP: A Survey
Qin, L.-B., Chen, Q., Feng, X., Wu, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, Y.-H., Li, M., Che, W.-X., & Yu, P. S. (2024) · Frontiers Comput. Sci. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.12819 · Cited by 191
Self-citationAutoTriton: Automatic Triton Programming with Reinforcement Learning in LLMs
Li, S., Wang, Z., He, Y., Li, Y., Shi, Q., Li, J., Hu, Y.-G., Che, W.-X., Han, X., Liu, Z.-Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.05687 · Cited by 50
DreamOn: Diffusion Language Models For Code Infilling Beyond Fixed-size Canvas
Wu, Z.-R., Zheng, L., Xie, Z.-H., Ye, J., Gao, J.-H., Gong, S., Feng, Y., Li, Z.-G., Bi, W., Zhou, G.-R., et al. (2026) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.01326 · Cited by 46
“In contrast, autoregressive models must resort to cumbersome workarounds for infilling, such as permuting the target span to the end of the sequence (Fried et al., 2023; Guo et al., 2024a; Hui et al., 2024; Seed et al., 2025).”
ArtifactsBench: Bridging the Visual-Interactive Gap in LLM Code Generation EvaluationPreprint
Zhang, C.-C., Li, Y., Xu, C., Liu, J.-H., Liu, A., Hu, S.-H., Wu, D.-P., Huang, G., Li, K.-J., Yi, Q., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.04952 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, W.-X., Xu, X.-X., An, W., Dai, F., Gao, W., He, Y.-C., Huang, J., Ji, Q., Jin, H., Li, X., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.24873 · Cited by 34
“Following Seed-Coder (Seed et al., 2025), we concatenate multiple source files within the same repository to form training samples at the project-level code structure, preventing the model from learning only isolated code snippets and promoting understanding of real-world engineering context.”
Self-citationTritonRL: Training LLMs to Think and Code Triton Without Cheating
Woo, J., Zhu, S.-W., Nie, A., Jia, Z., Wang, Y.-D., & Park, Y. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.17891 · Cited by 32
BeyondSWE: Can Current Code Agent Survive Beyond Single-Repo Bug Fixing?
Chen, G.-X., Meng, F., Zhao, J., Li, M.-H., Cheng, D., Song, H.-T., Chen, J., Lin, Y.-Z., Chen, H., Zhao, X., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.03194 · Cited by 25
“0 (Seed et al., 2025) under SearchSWE, remain competitive, while several high-cost configurations do not lie on the performance frontier.”
Self-citationMedAgentGym: Training LLM Agents for Code-Based Medical Reasoning at Scale
Xu, R., Zhuang, Y.-C., Zhong, Y., Yu, Y., Tang, X.-R., Wu, H., Wang, M. D., Ruan, P., Yang, D. M., Wang, T., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.04405 · Cited by 15
“• Seed-Coder-8B-Reasoning (Seed et al., 2025) is an 8B-parameter open-source coding LLM optimized for code generation, leveraging Long-Chain-of-Thought (LongCoT) reinforcement learning to improve multi-step code reasoning.”
Exploring the Potential of Diffusion Large Language Models in Code Generation
Li, C.-Z., Zhang, Y.-T., Li, J., Cai, L.-Y., & Li, G. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3848514 · Cited by 17
Self-citationStable-DiffCoder: Pushing the Frontier of Code Diffusion Large Language Model
Fan, C., Heng, W., Li, B., Liu, S., Song, Y., Su, J., Qu, X.-Y., Shen, K., & Wei, W. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.15892 · Cited by 16
“Building on the observations, we propose Stable-DiffCoder, a diffusion language model that reuses the autoregressive Seed-Coder [49] pipeline and data but achieves stronger performance.”
InfluentialSelf-citationReward Modeling from Natural Language Human Feedback
Wang, Z., Wang, R., Wu, Y.-C., Yu, Y.-Y., Zhang, P.-Y., Sun, S.-N., Yang, Y.-J., & Li, Y.-B. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.07349 · Cited by 15
“…tasks such as mathematical problems (Xie et al., 2025; Shao et al., 2024; Li et al., 2025c; Yu et al., 2025b; Li et al., 2025d) or code execution (Seed et al., 2025; Hui et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2025a), GRMs can effectively evaluate a much broader range of tasks including social intelligence…”
Self-citationAre We Ready for RL in Text-to-3D Generation? A Progressive Investigation
Tang, Y., Guo, Z., Zhu, K., Zhang, R., Chen, Q., Jiang, D.-Z., Liu, J.-L., Zeng, B.-H., Song, H.-M., Qu, D.-L., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.10949 · Cited by 12
“These RL-driven approaches have proven effective across mathematical problem-solving [23, 41] and code generation [22], establishing RL as a key technique for eliciting advanced capabilities in large-scale models.”
TuRTLe: A Unified Evaluation of LLMs for RTL Generation
García-Gasulla, D., Kestor, G., Parisi, E., Alberti-Binimelis, M., Gutierrez, C., Ghorab, R. M., Montenegro, O., Homs, B., & Moretó, M. (2025) · Workshop on Machine Learning for CAD · doi:10.1109/mlcad65511.2025.11189228 · Cited by 12
“That includes twelve models spanning six distinct model families: SeedCoder [46], OpenCoder [41], Qwen 2.5 [43], QwenCoder 2.5 [47], DeepSeek Coder V1 [48], Llama 3 [49] and CodeL-lama [9].”
InfluentialCodeBoost: Boosting Code LLMs by Squeezing Knowledge from Code Snippets with RL
Wang, S.-J., Guo, Q., Zhao, K., Zhang, Y., Li, X., Li, X., Li, S., She, R., Yu, S., & Tay, W. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.05242 · Cited by 10
“5-Coder [ 13], Qwen3 [39], and Seed-Coder [32] demonstrating strong performance across a variety of coding benchmarks.”
Self-citationFeatBench: Towards More Realistic Evaluation of Feature-level Code Generation
Chen, H., Li, C., & Li, J. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.22237 · Cited by 8
“Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in software engineering and have been widely adopted for code generation [6, 12, 23].”
Self-citationLongCodeZip: Compress Long Context for Code Language Models
Shi, Y., Qian, Y., Zhang, H., Shen, B., & Gu, X. (2025) · 2025 40th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase63991.2025.00020 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“5-Coder in 2024 [11] and Seed-Coder in 2025 [12], achieve similarly strong performance with only minor differences in average ES scores.”
DeNovoSWE: Scaling Long-Horizon Environments for Generating Entire Repositories from ScratchPreprint
Zhao, J., Chen, G.-X., Meng, F.-Z., Zhao, W., Song, R.-H., Wen, J.-R., & Jia, K. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.10728 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Du, W., Zhuo, J.-M., Dong, Y.-X., He, A., Sun, W., Zheng, Z.-Y., Karunaratne, M., Fox, I., Dettmers, T., Chen, T., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.16625 · Cited by 6
“General-purpose code models (OpenAI, 2025; Li et al., 2022; Roziere et al., 2023; Seed et al., 2025; Hui et al., 2024) have achieved strong results on benchmarks such as HumanEval (Chen et al., 2021) and SWE-bench (Jimenez et al., 2023), especially for well-represented languages with abundant…”
InCoder-32B-Thinking: Industrial Code World Model for Thinking
Yang, J., Zhang, W., Wu, J.-J., Cheng, J.-H., Zheng, T., Xu, F.-J., Gu, W.-Q., Jing, L., Du, Y.-X., Li, J., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.03144 · Cited by 6
“…[27]; Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 [77]; Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct and Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B-Instruct [55]; Seed-Coder-8B-Instruct [59]; Kimi-Dev-72B [82]; Kimi-K2-Instruct-0905 and Kimi-K2-Thinking [67]; KAT-Dev and KAT-Dev-72B-Exp [86]; and GLM-4.”
AscendOptimizer: Episodic Agent for Ascend NPU Operator Optimization
Wu, J., Huang, Z., Li, W., Shen, C., Sheng, J., & Wang, X.-F. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.23566 · Cited by 6
“…[31], and AutoTriton [15] employ multi-round RL to train models for generating efficient kernels; the CUDA-L1/L2 [17, 25] series and Seed-Coder [22] utilize large-scale sampling and contrastive learning to enable models to generate matrix multiplication operators that surpass closed-source…”
DICE: Diffusion Large Language Models Excel at Generating CUDA Kernels
Bai, H.-L., Kong, L., Chen, X.-Y., Wang, J.-M., Tao, Z., & Wang, H. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.11715 · Cited by 6
“Empirical results indicate that even state-of-the-art reasoning models, such as Qwen3 (Yang et al., 2025) and Seed-Coder-Reasoning (Seed et al., 2025), struggle to generate functionally correct CUDA kernels.”
Latent Reasoning with Normalizing Flows
Tu, G., Fu, X., Yu, S.-H., Tang, Y.-H., Kang, H., Qin, L.-H., Zhang, Y.-Z., & Gu, J.-T. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.06447 · Cited by 5
“5-Coder (Hui et al., 2024), OpenCoder (Huang et al., 2025), OlympicCoder (Hug-ging Face, 2025), and Seed-Coder (Seed et al., 2025); diffusion baselines (Ho et al., 2020) include Dream (Ye et al., 2025), LLaDA (Nie et al., 2026), Diffu-Coder (Gong et al., 2025), Dream-Coder (Xie et al., 2025), and d1 (Zhao et al., 2026…”
Self-citationBoruch-Gruszecki, A., Zi, Y.-T., Wu, Z.-X., Oberoi, T., Anderson, C., Biswas, J., & Guha, A. (2025) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.04865 · Cited by 5
“Few adjustments were necessary, since the problems already specified programs and tests using standard I/O.”
SwingArena: Competitive Programming Arena for Long-context GitHub Issue Solving
Xu, W.-D., Xiong, J., Zhao, C., Chen, Q., Wang, H., Shen, H., Wan, Z., Dai, J., Wu, T.-Q., Xiao, H., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.23932 · Cited by 5
CodeSkill: Latent Skill Abstraction for Long-Horizon Code Agents
Wu, S.-L., Wang, J.-Y., Du, Z.-C., Gan, W.-N., & Liu, W.-W. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.33243 · Cited by 4
Detecting RLVR Training Data via Structural Convergence of Reasoning
Zhang, H.-B., Yang, Y., Yan, J.-H., Bao, G., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.11792 · Cited by 4
“…remarkable improvements in reasoning performance, particularly on benchmarks with verifiable answers such as mathematics (Guo et al., 2025; Zeng et al., 2025; Team et al., 2025; He et al., 2025), coding (Seed et al., 2025; Liu et al., 2025), and symbolic problem solving (Xie et al., 2025).”
Self-citationJiang, Y.-Q., Wang, J.-Z., Shen, Z.-Q., Lin, Z., Wang, J.-Y., Yang, Y., Dai, K.-S., & Luo, H.-R. (2026) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3770855.3818987 · Cited by 4
“As shown in Figure 1, LLMs can interpret natural-language specifications and generate corresponding structural modeling code [15, 18, 36], enabling automated construction of simulation-ready models.”
LaDi-RL: Latent Diffusion Reasoning Prevents Entropy Collapse in Reinforcement Learning
Kang, H., Zhang, Y.-Z., Kuang, N. L., Ma, Y.-A., & Qin, L.-H. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.01705 · Cited by 4
Self-citationYour thoughts tell who you are: Characterize the reasoning patterns of LRMs
Chen, Y., Mao, Y.-I., Yang, X., Ge, S., Bi, S.-J., Liu, L.-J., Hosseini, S., Tan, L., Nie, Y.-X., & Nie, S.-L. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.24147 · Cited by 4
“Recently, Sun et al. (2025) uses classification as an exploratory probe to detect differentiating output patterns of non-reasoning LLMs, such as Grok-2 and Gemini-1.”
InfluentialEfficient Test-Time Optimization for Multi-Agent Proof Autoformalization
Liu, T.-S., Zhang, S., Geng, Z., Liu, H.-Y., Xu, R.-T., Wang, P.-Y., Yuan, L., & Yu, Y. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.11307 · Cited by 3
SWE-Pruner: Self-Adaptive Context Pruning for Coding Agents
Wang, Y., Shi, Y., Yang, M., Zhang, R., He, S., Lian, H., Chen, Y., Ye, S., Cai, K., & Gu, X. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.16746 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“We also validate with Seed-Coder-8B-Instruct (ByteDance Seed et al., 2025), obtaining similar results (see Section G).”
InfluentialReinforcement Learning in the Era of Large Language Models: Challenges and Opportunities
Hao, Q., Chen, L., Qi, X.-K., Yuan, Y., Zong, Z., Chen, H. S., Zhao, K., Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Yuan, J., et al. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3837057
“For data curation , Computational Thinking [192] structures decomposition around abstraction and modularity, whereas Seed-Coder [127] self-evolves by generating and filtering training data.”
Self-citationCODEBLOCK: Learning to Supervise Code at the Right Granularity
Deng, Z.-J., Li, L., Pang, J., Hu, K., Xuan, Q., Zhu, Z.-W., & Wei, J.-H. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.18286 · Cited by 2
“An isolated variable name or operator may not carry complete semantics on its own; only when combined into an assignment statement, conditional branch, or return expression does it constitute code evidence that truly affects program behavior.”
Uncovering Business Logic Bugs via Semantics-Driven Unit Test Generation (Experience Paper)
Yang, C., & Chen, J.-J. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3832192 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“1.1) [1] and are powered by the SeedCode LLM via API [25].”
InfluentialSelf-citationSynthesizing File-Level Data for Unit Test Generation with Chain-of-Thoughts via Self-Debugging
Hua, Z.-Y., Chen, T.-Y., Gong, Y., Lu, S., Cheng, P., Zhu, Q.-L., He, Y.-B., Fu, Y.-J., Jiao, W.-P., Yang, W., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the 41st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3832783.3837477 · Cited by 2
“It has been widely used in synthesizing high-quality training data [3, 4, 41].”
LongCodeZip: Compress Long Context for Code Language Models
Shi, Y., Qian, Y., Zhang, H., Shen, B., & Gu, X. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“5-Coder in 2024 [11] and Seed-Coder in 2025 [12], achieve similarly strong performance with only minor differences in average ES scores.”
NL2Repo-Bench: Towards Long-Horizon Repository Generation Evaluation of Coding Agents
Ding, J., Long, S., Pu, C., Zhou, H., Gao, H., Gao, X., He, C., Hou, Y., Hu, F., Li, Z., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.12730 · Cited by 1
“Advanced training strategies, including domain knowledge distillation [16] and self-curated data synthesis (e.g., Seed-Coder [36]), along with reasoning-enhanced models like Seed-Thinking [23], continue to improve code understanding and generation.”
Self-citationFeng, Y., Sun, J., Yang, Z., Ai, J., Li, C., Li, Z., Zhang, F., He, K., Ma, R., Lin, J., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.14337 · Cited by 1
“Firstly, code-oriented LLMs (Rozière et al., 2023; Li et al., 2023; Seed et al., 2025; Huang et al., 2024) such as DeepSeek-Coder (Guo et al., 2024) and Qwen3-Coder (Yang et al., 2025a) have demonstrated considerable capabilities in code understanding and generation.”
Self-citationBenchChecker: Assessing the Credibility of Bug-Fixing Benchmarks for LLMs
Wu, D., He, X., Wang, S., & Sun, K. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.19447 · Cited by 1
From Tokens to Regions: CUDA-Sensitive Instruction Tuning for GPU Kernel Generation
Chen, W.-T., Zhu, J.-C., Chai, X., Qu, Z., Xiao, Q., Duan, L., & Zou, A.-Q. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.16231 · Cited by 1
“7B-Instruct [27], and Seed-Coder-8B-Instruct [46].”
Self-citationBridging Generation and Training: A Systematic Review of Quality Issues in LLMs for Code
He, K.-F., Zhang, X.-J., Cai, P.-L., Liu, M.-W., Wang, Y.-L., Wang, C., Huang, K.-F., Chen, B., Peng, X., & Zheng, Z.-B. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.05267 · Cited by 1
“Data-LevelMitigation DataCleaningandFiltering Execution-Feedback-BasedFiltering Qwen2 [139] ,TeleChat [131] ,KimiK2 [117] ,Seed-Coder [110] Rule-orTool-BasedFilteringandSanitization LessIsMore [146] ,Qwen [9] ,PackageHallucinations [113] ,CIDRe [26] , Infinite-Instruct [137] ,QualityIn,QualityOut…”
InfluentialSteerable Instruction Following Coding Data Synthesis with Actor-Parametric Schema Co-Evolution
Huang, T.-L., Chen, B.-Y., Zhang, X., Shen, K., & Ying, R. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.16322 · Cited by 1
“Large language models (LLMs) have recently achieved remarkable success in automatic programming, spanning domains from competitive programming [1, 16, 23] to software engineering [9, 14, 36].”
Self-citationMonotonic Reference-Free Refinement for Autoformalization
Zhang, L., Valentino, M., & Freitas, A. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.23166 · Cited by 1
“Our framework extends these ideas by employing both theorem provers and LLM-based judges to iteratively select high-quality autoformalization candidates, resulting in a monotonic improvement process at test time.”
Beyond Text-to-SQL: Can LLMs Really Debug Enterprise ETL SQL?
Ye, J., Duan, Y., Yu, Y., Ma, V., Gao, Y., & Chen, X. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.18119 · Cited by 1
Unveiling Inference Scaling for Difference-Aware User Modeling in LLM Personalization
Chen, S., Bai, Y.-M., Huang, Y., Zhao, X.-Y., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.15389 · Cited by 1
“Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across real-world applications—such as virtual assistants [2], content creation [17], and scientific discovery [20]—driven by their powerful capabilities in context comprehension, generation, and reasoning [3, 21].”
Self-citationThe Cream Rises to the Top: Efficient Reranking Method for Verilog Code Generation
Yang, G., Zheng, W., Chen, X., Sun, Y.-F., Zhang, F.-J., & Zhuo, T. Y. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.20215 · Cited by 1
“We use Seed-Coder [14] to sample 10 implementations per specification.”
Self-citationSynthCoder: Anti-pattern identification and model training for FIM mode code completion
Yu, D., Yan, X., Li, Z., Xiao, J., He, H., Yu, Y., Zhang, H., Rong, G., & Huang, X. (2026) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-026-10957-6
“…such as aiXcoder (Jiang et al. 2025b ; Li et al. 2025), StarCoder (Li et al. 2023), DeepSeek (Guo et al. 2024), Qwen (Hui et al. 2024), and Seed (Seed et al. 2025) series – on Exact Match (EM) and Edit Similarity (ES) for text-based FIM benchmarks, and on Pass@1 for Santa - coder-fim-task, a…”
InfluentialSynthCoder: A Synthetical Strategy to Tune LLMs for Code Completion
Yu, D.-J., Yan, X., Li, Z.-R., Xiao, J.-P., He, H.-C., Yu, Y.-D., Zhang, H., Rong, G.-P., & Huang, X.-B. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.15495 · Cited by 1
“…such as aiXcoder (Jiang et al. 2025b ; Li et al. 2025), StarCoder (Li et al. 2023), DeepSeek (Guo et al. 2024), Qwen (Hui et al. 2024), and Seed (Seed et al. 2025) series – on Exact Match (EM) and Edit Similarity (ES) for text-based FIM benchmarks, and on Pass@1 for Santa - coder-fim-task, a…”
InfluentialWhat Makes In-Context Examples Effective for Code Generation?
Li, D., Chen, S., Cao, J., & Cheung, S.-C. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3832275
Jiang, J., Shen, J., Kim, S., Yoo, K. M., Kim, J., & Kim, S. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.05863
Chenail-Larcher, Z., Lunghi, D., Tessa, M., Stiévenart, Q., Klein, J., Bissyandé, T. F., Avellaneda, F., & Moha, N. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.40735
Exploring The Empirical Privacy Landscape of Synthetic Data
Zhao, Z., Schwarzschild, A., Meehan, C., Lee, K., Feng, Z.-L., & Sam, D. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.22659
“For example, models improve in coding capabilities when they have been trained with a large amount of coding data (Aryabumi et al., 2025; Seed et al., 2025; Wei et al., 2024).”
Tang, A. S., Tang, W., Jiang, S.-Y., Li, T.-H., Xu, S.-Z., Woo, J., Ozkara, K., Park, Y., Jia, Z., & Esmaeilzadeh, H. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.20980
The Tokens Strike Back: Safety-Aware Denoising with Directional Embedding-based Revision
Yusuf, A., Shin, J.-W., Deng, R.-Z., Guimarães, H. R., Dvornik, N., & Park, M. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.17636
“The main jailbreak tables concern DIJA and PAD.”
InfluentialDiff Diffusion: Predicting Edit Paths with Diffusion Models for Efficient Code Editing
Xu, X.-L., Jiang, H.-Z., Jiang, B., Deng, Z.-W., Sun, N.-Y., Chen, B.-Z., Chen, J., & Wei, C.-X. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.17831
“Our autoregressive baseline is the production edit-prediction model used before the diffusion cutover, trained from Seed-Coder [8].”
Self-citationZhang, Y.-R., & Shrestha, Y. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.15897
Self-citationUltraData-Code: From Raw Repositories to Algorithmically Dense and Task-Oriented Code Data
Tu, C.-Y., Zhao, H.-Y., Xue, S.-K., Qu, Z.-M., Zhou, J., Lin, X., Guo, J., Fu, Z.-X., Ma, Q., Zhou, J., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.23960
“Accordingly, constructing and curating code corpora has become a central research focus (Li et al., 2023; Huang et al., 2025; Seed et al., 2025).”
InfluentialPractical Secrets Extraction against Black-box LLMs
Zhao, S.-Q., Jiang, S.-W., Li, X.-F., Hu, R.-Y., Zheng, Y.-D., Guo, C.-Y., Zhang, T.-W., & Lưu, A. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.36941
“5-Coder-7B as the victim model and Seed-Coder-8B as the proxy.”
Quality over quantity: Diversity-aware data selection for efficient verilog code generation
Shen, Y.-H., Zheng, W., Wei, X., Shen, H., Chen, X., & Yang, G. (2026) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2026.124283
“• SeedCoder 8B [25] adopts a model-centric data pipeline that leverages LLMs to curate code pretraining data, minimizing reliance on hand-crafted filtering rules.”
CodeTS: Verifiable Text-to-Time Series Generation via Executable Code
Yuan, X.-D., Liu, S., Zheng, T.-Y., Zhuang, H.-P., Song, M., & Chen, K.-X. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.15393
“We further evaluate several mainstream and recent strong LLMs under the same Text-to-Code-to-TS prompting setup, including IQuest-Coder-V1-7B-Instruct [Yang et al., 2026], Devstral-Instruct-24B [Rastogi et al., 2025], Seed-Coder-8B-Instruct [Seed et al., 2025], and Qwen3.”
Self-citationExecution-Anchored Hallucination Calibration Reranking for Verilog Code Generation
Yang, G., Hu, X., Chen, X., Zhuo, T. Y., & Xia, X. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.22938
“5-Coder-7B [25], OpenCoder-8B [26], and Seed-Coder-8B [27], which are open-source models optimized for code generation across multiple programming languages; (3) Verilog-specialized models : HaVen [28], VeriPrefer [29], and CodeV-R1 [30], which are fine-tuned specifically on Verilog corpora to…”
RTLCurator: Label-Efficient Data Curation for RTL Generation
Cai, S., Li, C.-Y., Chang, W.-J., Wang, K., Gao, H.-Y., Han, Y.-H., & Wang, Y. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.29283
Self-citationCertiCoder: Towards MISRA-Compliant C Code Generation with LLMs
Gou, M., Yao, Z., Ma, H., Zhang, E.-D., Zhou, J., & He, F. (2026) · Proc. ACM Softw. Eng. · doi:10.1145/3797120
LLM Evolution as an Industry-Scale Ecosystem: A Lifecycle Perspective on Continual Learning
Jiang, H., Yang, E.-N., Zhu, G.-J., Chen, Y., Xu, Y., Kou, Z., Li, J., Chen, C., Cao, Z., & Shen, L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.24901
NovelAPIBench: Diagnosing How A Code LLM Learns to Use Novel APIs
Liu, J.-N., Peng, Y., Niu, J.-H., & Wen, H.-Y. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.03657
“We replicate the knowledge-component study on five additional backbones (R1-Distill-Qwen-7B (Guo et al., 2025), Seed-Coder-5 8B (Seed et al., 2025), OpenCoder-8B (Huang et al., 2025), Qwen2.”
Learning to Verify: Efficient Verilog Code Reranking via Collaborative Knowledge Distillation
Shen, Y.-H., Yang, G., Zheng, W., Sun, Y.-F., Zhang, F.-J., Chen, X., Xu, F.-P., & Xia, H.-X. (2026) · IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network · doi:10.1109/ijcnn69854.2026.11729245
“We first use Seed-Coder [18] to sample 10 candidate implementations for each specification from VeriCoder’s dataset [19].”
Self-citationKojic, M., Bondyrev, I., de Moor, A., Shtok, J., Borovlev, P., Lysaniuk, K., Kannan, M., Dolgov, I., & Pavlichenko, N. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.31268
“5-9B [74], OLMo-3-7B [71], Ministral-3-14B [43], and Seed-Coder-8B [7].”
Cascaded Code Editing: Large-Small Model Collaboration for Effective and Efficient Code Editing
Wang, C.-Z., Yang, Z.-Z., Gao, S.-Z., Gao, C.-Y., Li, Z.-J., Li, Y.-C., Peng, T., Huang, H.-L., Deng, Y., & Lyu, M. R. (2026) · Proc. ACM Softw. Eng. · doi:10.1145/3808101
“For CanItEdit, we report Pass@1 for both lazy and descriptive NL descriptions [48, 49].”
Sun, Z. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 IEEE/ACM 48th International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3774748.3787758
“5-Coder (7B) [5], and Seed-Coder (8B) [9].”
SCoGen: Scenario-Centric Graph-Based Synthesis of Real-World Code Problems
Yao, X., Lang, D., Zhang, W., Guo, X.-T., Xie, H., Ni, Y., Liu, P., Shen, G., Bai, Y., Tu, D.-D., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.14281
“…have primarily focused on two complementary directions: (1) enhancing the utility of real-world code data through improvements in data quality [Seed et al., 2025], and (2) adopting synthesis strategies to generate high-quality synthetic code data [Qin et al., 2025] [Wang et al., 2023] [Ge et…”
Self-citationSWE-ABS: Adversarial Benchmark Strengthening Exposes Inflated Success Rates on Test-based Benchmark
Yu, B., Cao, Y., Zhang, Y., Lin, L., Xu, J., Zhong, Z., Xu, Q., Wang, G., Cao, J., Cheung, S.-C., et al. (2026) · arXiv · Cited by 2
Self-citationYour Code Agent Can Grow Alongside You with Structured Memory
Deng, Y.-X., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Yang, G.-W., & Yang, S. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.13258
Self-citation
- Authors
- Seed, B., Zhang, Y., Su, J., Sun, Y., Xi, C., Xiao, X., Zheng, S., Zhang, A., Liu, K., Zan, D., Sun, T., Zhu, J., Xin, S., Huang, D., Bai, Y., Dong, L., Li, C., Chen, J., Zhou, H., Huang, Y., Ning, G., Song, X., Chen, J., Liu, S., Shen, K., Xiang, L., & Wu, Y.
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2506.03524
- OpenAlex
- W4416131244
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Keywords
- large language models, open-source LLMs, code generation, code completion, code editing, preference optimization, supervised fine-tuning, programming languages
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review