PreprintCited by 1Topic ModelingAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

ProtoReasoning: Prototypes as the Foundation for Generalizable Reasoning in LLMs

Open access
He, Feng, Chen, Zijun, Liang, Xinnian, Ma, Tingting, Qiu, Yunqi, Wu, Shuangzhi, Yan, Junchi·2025·arXiv

Abstract

Recent advances in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) trained with Long Chain-of-Thought (Long CoT) reasoning have demonstrated remarkable cross-domain generalization capabilities. However, the underlying mechanisms supporting such transfer remain poorly understood. We hypothesize that cross-domain generalization arises from shared abstract reasoning prototypes -- fundamental reasoning patterns that capture the essence of problems across domains. These prototypes minimize the nuances of the representation, revealing that seemingly diverse tasks are grounded in shared reasoning structures.Based on this hypothesis, we propose ProtoReasoning, a framework that enhances the reasoning ability of LLMs by leveraging scalable and verifiable prototypical representations (Prolog for logical reasoning, PDDL for planning).ProtoReasoning features: (1) an automated prototype construction pipeline that transforms problems into corresponding prototype representations; (2) a comprehensive verification system providing reliable feedback through Prolog/PDDL interpreters; (3) the scalability to synthesize problems arbitrarily within prototype space while ensuring correctness. Extensive experiments show that ProtoReasoning achieves 4.7% improvement over baseline models on logical reasoning (Enigmata-Eval), 6.3% improvement on planning tasks, 4.0% improvement on general reasoning (MMLU) and 1.0% on mathematics (AIME24). Significantly, our ablation studies confirm that learning in prototype space also demonstrates enhanced generalization to structurally similar problems compared to training solely on natural language representations, validating our hypothesis that reasoning prototypes serve as the foundation for generalizable reasoning in large language models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2506.15211

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. IPC. International planning competition. URL https://www.icaps-conference.org/competitions/.
  2. Nasim Borazjanizadeh and Steven T Piantadosi. Reliable reasoning beyond natural language. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.11373, 2024. · arXiv
  3. Jiangjie Chen, Qianyu He, Siyu Yuan, Aili Chen, Zhicheng Cai, Weinan Dai, Hongli Yu, Qiying Yu, Xuefeng Li, Jiaze Chen, Hao Zhou, and Mingxuan Wang. Enigmata: Scaling logical reasoning in large language models with synthetic verifiable puzzles, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19914. · arXiv
  4. Qiguang Chen, Libo Qin, Jinhao Liu, Dengyun Peng, Jiannan Guan, Peng Wang, Mengkang Hu, Yuhang Zhou, Te Gao, and Wanxiang Che. Towards reasoning era: A survey of long chain-of-thought for reasoning large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09567, 2025. · arXiv
  5. Herbert B Enderton. A mathematical introduction to logic. Elsevier, 2001.
  6. Luyu Gao, Aman Madaan, Shuyan Zhou, Uri Alon, Pengfei Liu, Yiming Yang, Jamie Callan, and Graham Neubig. Pal: Program-aided language models. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 10764-10799. PMLR, 2023.
  7. Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Ruoyu Zhang, Runxin Xu, Qihao Zhu, Shirong Ma, Peiyi Wang, Xiao Bi, et al. Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948, 2025. · arXiv
  8. Simeng Han, Tianyu Liu, Chuhan Li, Xuyuan Xiong, and Arman Cohan. Hybridmind: Meta selection of natural language and symbolic language for enhanced llm reasoning, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.19381. · arXiv
  9. M. Helmert. The fast downward planning system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 26:191-246, July 2006. ISSN 1076-9757. doi: 10.1613/jair.1705. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1613/jair.1705. · DOI
  10. Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. Measuring massive multitask language understanding, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.03300. · arXiv
  11. Richard Howey, Derek Long, and Maria Fox. Val: Automatic plan validation, continuous effects and mixed initiative planning using pddl. In 16th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pages 294-301. IEEE, 2004.
  12. Komal Kumar, Tajamul Ashraf, Omkar Thawakar, Rao Muhammad Anwer, Hisham Cholakkal, Mubarak Shah, Ming-Hsuan Yang, Phillip HS Torr, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, and Salman Khan. Llm post-training: A deep dive into reasoning large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.21321, 2025. · arXiv
  13. Liangming Pan, Alon Albalak, Xinyi Wang, and William Yang Wang. Logic-lm: Empowering large language models with symbolic solvers for faithful logical reasoning. In The 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
  14. Qwen, :, An Yang, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jian Yang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jianxin Yang, Jiaxi Yang, et al. Qwen2.5 technical report, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15115. · arXiv
  15. John Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Radford, and Oleg Klimov. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347, 2017. · arXiv
  16. ByteDance Seed, Yufeng Yuan, Yu Yue, Mingxuan Wang, Xiaochen Zuo, Jiaze Chen, Lin Yan, Wenyuan Xu, Chi Zhang, Xin Liu, et al. Seed-thinking-v1. 5: Advancing superb reasoning models with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13914, 2025. · arXiv
  17. Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song, Xiao Bi, Haowei Zhang, Mingchuan Zhang, YK Li, Y Wu, et al. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300, 2024. · arXiv
  18. Kimi Team, Angang Du, Bofei Gao, Bowei Xing, Changjiu Jiang, Cheng Chen, Cheng Li, Chenjun Xiao, Chenzhuang Du, Chonghua Liao, et al. Kimi k1. 5: Scaling reinforcement learning with llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12599, 2025. · arXiv
  19. Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, et al. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:24824-24837, 2022.
  20. Jan Wielemaker, Zhisheng Huang, and Lourens Van Der Meij. Swi-prolog and the web. Theory and practice of logic programming, 8(3):363-392, 2008.
  21. Jan Wielemaker, Tom Schrijvers, Markus Triska, and Torbjörn Lager. Swi-prolog. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 12(1-2):67-96, 2012.
  22. Chulin Xie, Yangsibo Huang, Chiyuan Zhang, Da Yu, Xinyun Chen, Bill Yuchen Lin, Bo Li, Badih Ghazi, and Ravi Kumar. On memorization of large language models in logical reasoning. In The 4th Workshop on Mathematical Reasoning and AI at NeurIPS'24.
  23. Tian Xie, Zitian Gao, Qingnan Ren, Haoming Luo, Yuqian Hong, Bryan Dai, Joey Zhou, Kai Qiu, Zhirong Wu, and Chong Luo. Logic-rl: Unleashing llm reasoning with rule-based reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14768, 2025. · arXiv
  24. An Yang, Anfeng Li, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Gao, Chengen Huang, Chenxu Lv, et al. Qwen3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388, 2025. · arXiv
  25. Ling Yang, Zhaochen Yu, Bin Cui, and Mengdi Wang. Reasonflux: Hierarchical llm reasoning via scaling thought templates. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.06772, 2025. · arXiv
  26. Xi Ye, Qiaochu Chen, Isil Dillig, and Greg Durrett. Satlm: Satisfiability-aided language models using declarative prompting. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:45548-45580, 2023.
  27. Qiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan, Xiaochen Zuo, Yu Yue, Tiantian Fan, Gaohong Liu, Lingjun Liu, Xin Liu, et al. Dapo: An open-source llm reinforcement learning system at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14476, 2025. · arXiv
  28. Tong Zheng, Lichang Chen, Simeng Han, R Thomas McCoy, and Heng Huang. Learning to reason via mixture-of- thought for logical reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15817, 2025. · arXiv
  29. Jin Peng Zhou, Charles Staats, Wenda Li, Christian Szegedy, Kilian Q Weinberger, and Yuhuai Wu. Don't trust: Verify-grounding llm quantitative reasoning with autoformalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18120, 2024. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, F., Chen, Z., Liang, X., Ma, T., Qiu, Y., Wu, S., & Yan, J.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415333566
Cited by
0
References
1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Keywords
large reasoning models, long chain-of-thought, domain generalization, Prolog, PDDL, reasoning verification, logical reasoning, planning tasks, mathematical reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review