The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Benchmarking the Discovery Engine
Abstract
The Discovery Engine is a general purpose automated system for scientific discovery, which combines machine learning with state-of-the-art ML interpretability to enable rapid and robust scientific insight across diverse datasets. In this paper, we benchmark the Discovery Engine against five recent peer-reviewed scientific publications applying machine learning across medicine, materials science, social science, and environmental science. In each case, the Discovery Engine matches or exceeds prior predictive performance while also generating deeper, more actionable insights through rich interpretability artefacts. These results demonstrate its potential as a new standard for automated, interpretable scientific modelling that enables complex knowledge discovery from data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?
Bloom, N., Jones, C. I., Van Reenen, J., & Webb, M. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20180338 · Cited by 1,002 · cited 1×
“Despite major advances in computational power and data availability, the rate of transformative scientific discovery has slowed [Bloom et al., 2020, Chu and Evans, 2021, Park et al., 2023].”
Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time
Park, M., Leahey, E., & Funk, R. J. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05543-x · Cited by 899
Metadata
- Authors
- Foxabbott, J., Tagade, A., Cusick, A., McCorkell, R., McKee-Reid, L., Patel, J., Rumbelow, J., Rumbelow, J., & Shams, Z.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- arXiv
- 2507.00964
- References
- 2
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
