PreprintCited by 2Cybersecurity and Information SystemsSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Testbed and Software Architecture for Enhancing Security in Industrial Private 5G Networks

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1109/etfa65518.2025.11205743

Abstract

In the era of Industry 4.0, the growing need for secure and efficient communication systems has driven the development of fifth-generation (5G) networks characterized by extremely low latency, massive device connectivity and high data transfer speeds. However, the deployment of 5G networks presents significant security challenges, requiring advanced and robust solutions to counter increasingly sophisticated cyber threats. This paper proposes a testbed and software architecture to strengthen the security of Private 5G Networks, particularly in industrial communication environments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2507.20873

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Xiongfeng Zhang, Seonjo Lim, Changdae Lee, Won Seok Song, Yu Chul Kim, Mengmeng Yu, Seung Ho Hong, Nam Hyun Yoo, and Min Wei. Integration of 5G and OPC UA for Smart Manufacturing of the Future. In 2023 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), pages 1-6, 2023. doi:10.1109/SII55687.2023.10039191. · DOI
  2. Adnan Aijaz. Private 5G: The Future of Industrial Wireless. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 14(4): 136-145, 2020. doi:10.1109/MIE.2020.3004975. · DOI
  3. Ashutosh Dutta and Eman Hammad. 5G Security Challenges and Opportunities: A System Approach. In 2020 IEEE 3rd 5G World Forum (5GWF), pages 109-114, 2020. doi:10.1109/5GWF49715.2020.9221122. · DOI
  4. Thomas Robert Doebbert, Henry Beuster, Gerd Scholl, Florian Fischer, and Dominik Merli. Testbed for Functional Safety-Relevant Wireless Communication Based on IO-Link Wireless and 5G. In dtec. bw-Beiträge der Helmut- Schmidt-Universität/Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, pages 147-152. 2022.
  5. Henry Beuster, Kevin Tebbe, Thomas Robert Doebbert, and Gerd Scholl. Measurements of the Safety Function Re- sponse Time on a Private 5G and IO-Link Wireless Testbed. In 2024 IEEE 29th International Conference on Emerg- ing Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), pages 1-4, 2024. doi:10.1109/ETFA61755.2024.10710762. · DOI
  6. Merve Ozkan-Okay, Refik Samet, Omer Aslan, and Deepti Gupta. A Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review on Intrusion Detection Systems. IEEE Access, 9:157727-157760, 2021. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3129336. · DOI
  7. Bowen Yang and Dong Liu. Research on Network Traffic Identification based on Machine Learning and Deep Packet Inspection. In 2019 IEEE 3rd Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC), pages 1887-1891, 2019. doi:10.1109/ITNEC.2019.8729153. · DOI
  8. Kyle Stein, Arash Mahyari, Guillermo Francia, and Eman El-Sheikh. A Transformer-Based Framework for Payload Malware Detection and Classification. In 2024 IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT), pages 105-111, 2024. doi:10.1109/AIIoT61789.2024.10579000. · DOI
  9. Hanan Hindy, Ethan Bayne, Miroslav Bures, Robert Atkinson, Christos Tachtatzis, and Xavier Bellekens. Machine Learning based IoT Intrusion Detection System: An MQTT case study (MQTT-IoT-IDS2020 dataset). In the 12th International Networking Conference, pages 73-84. Springer, 2020.
  10. Zhixin Wen, Harsh Sanjay Pacherkar, and Guanhua Yan. VET5G: A Virtual End-to-End Testbed for 5G Network Security Experimentation. In Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Cyber Security Experimentation and Test, pages 19-29, 2022.
  11. Karim Baccar and Abdelkader Lahmadi. An Experimental Testbed for 5G Network Security Assess- ment. In NOMS 2023-2023 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium, pages 1-6, 2023. doi:10.1109/NOMS56928.2023.10154283. · DOI
  12. Ibrahim Almazyad, Safwan Elmadani, and Salim Hariri. A 5G and Beyond Testbed for Cybersecurity Research and Education. In 2024 IEEE/ACS 21st International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA), pages 1-6. IEEE, 2024.
  13. Jon-Martin Storm, Siv Hilde Houmb, Pallavi Kaliyar, Laszlo Erdodi, and Janne Merete Hagen. Testing Commercial Intrusion Detection Systems for Industrial Control Systems in a Substation Hardware in the Loop Testlab. Electronics, 13(1):60, 2023.
  14. Sandeep Singh Bindra and Alankrita Aggarwal. Deep Learning-based Enhanced Security in Cyber-Physical Systems: A Multi-Attack Perspective. In 2024 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications (ICCICA), volume 1, pages 347-352. IEEE, 2024.
  15. Jonghoon Lee, Hyunjin Kim, Chulhee Park, Youngsoo Kim, and Jong-Geun Park. AI-based Network Security Enhancement for 5G Industrial Internet of Things Environments. In 2022 13th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), pages 971-975, 2022. doi:10.1109/ICTC55196.2022.9952490. · DOI
  16. Song Son Ha, Henry Beuster, Thomas Robert Doebbert, and Gerd Scholl. An FPGA-based Unidirectional Gateway Proposal for OT-IT Network Separation to Secure Industrial Automation Systems. In 2023 IEEE 21st International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), pages 1-6, 2023. doi:10.1109/INDIN51400.2023.10218126. · DOI
  17. Song Son Ha, Henry Beuster, Thomas Robert Doebbert, and Gerd Scholl. A New Approach to Secure Industrial Automation Systems Based on Revolution Pi Modules. In 2022 IEEE 27th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), pages 1-4, 2022. doi:10.1109/ETFA52439.2022.9921668. · DOI
  18. Charles Varlei Neu, Ina Schiering, and Avelino Zorzo. Simulating and Detecting Attacks of Untrusted Clients in OPC UA Networks. In Proceedings of the Third Central European Cybersecurity Conference (CECC), pages 1-6, 2019.
  19. Ranjit Panigrahi. Cicids2017, 2025. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/akxq-9v09. Accessed: May. 23, 2025. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Ha, S. S., Foerster, F., Doebbert, T. R., Kittel, T., Merli, D., & Scholl, G.
Affiliations
  • Helmut Schmidt University (DE)
  • Technische Hochschule Augsburg (DE)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
Pages
1-4
OpenAlex
W4415398736
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
2.45
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cybersecurity and Information Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Keywords
private 5G networks, industrial networks, network security, testbed, software architecture, Industry 4.0, cyber threats, industrial communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review