PreprintCited by 0Music and Audio ProcessingMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

MECAT: A Multi-Experts Constructed Benchmark for Fine-Grained Audio Understanding Tasks

Open access
Niu, Yadong, Wang, Tianzi, Dinkel, Heinrich, Sun, Xingwei, Zhou, Jiahao, Li, Gang, Liu, Jizhong, Liu, Xunying +2 more·2025·arXiv

Abstract

While large audio-language models have advanced open-ended audio understanding, they still fall short of nuanced human-level comprehension. This gap persists largely because current benchmarks, limited by data annotations and evaluation metrics, fail to reliably distinguish between generic and highly detailed model outputs. To this end, this work introduces MECAT, a Multi-Expert Constructed Benchmark for Fine-Grained Audio Understanding Tasks. Generated via a pipeline that integrates analysis from specialized expert models with Chain-of-Thought large language model reasoning, MECAT provides multi-perspective, fine-grained captions and open-set question-answering pairs. The benchmark is complemented by a novel metric: DATE (Discriminative-Enhanced Audio Text Evaluation). This metric penalizes generic terms and rewards detailed descriptions by combining single-sample semantic similarity with cross-sample discriminability. A comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art audio models is also presented, providing new insights into their current capabilities and limitations. The data and code are available at https://github.com/xiaomi-research/mecat

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2507.23511

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the DeepStack ablation, both models undergo an identical two-stage training pipeline: an initial alignment phase using ASR data, followed by fine-tuning on the MECAT-Caption dataset.

    “Both models undergo an identical two-stage training pipeline: an initial alignment phase using ASR data, followed by fine-tuning on the MECAT-Caption [64] dataset.”

    From MOSS-Audio Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [64]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Authors
Niu, Y., Wang, T., Dinkel, H., Sun, X., Zhou, J., Li, G., Liu, J., Liu, X., Zhang, J., & Luan, J.
Affiliations
  • Xiaomi (China) (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W6929656414
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
audio understanding, audio captioning, benchmark design, expert models, chain-of-thought reasoning, audio-language models, semantic similarity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review