The DOI matches its DataCite record; its reference list is not available.
Decrease in Milky Way rotation curve revisited
Open accessAbstract
Context. Latest papers on the rotation curve of the Milky Way galaxy, i. e. Ou et al. (2024); Jiao et al. (2023); Sylos Labini et al. (2023) suggest a Keplerian decrease in the rotation curve. This behavior is not consistent with other spiral galaxies (Lelli et al. 2016; Mistele et al. 2024). Aims. Show that the prior use of the axisymmetric Jeans equation is not consistent with the final model produced in the papers. Methods. Comparison of the results on gravitational potential in Ou et al. (2024); Jiao et al. (2023); Sylos Labini et al. (2023) with the prior assumptions about the axisymemtric properties of the Milky Way galaxy. Results. The gravitational potentials published by Ou et al. (2024); Jiao et al. (2023); Sylos Labini et al. (2023) lead to almost spherically symmetric properties of the Milky Way galaxy at Galactocentric radii above 20 kpc, which is not consistent with the use of axisymmetric Jeans equations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Klačka & Šturc (2025) showed that in the best-fit mass models of Jiao et al. (2023) and Ou et al. (2024), the spherically distributed dark matter halo accounts for at least 88% of the total radial gravitational acceleration at R = 27 kpc.
“Klaˇ cka & Šturc (2025) showed that in the best-fit mass models of Jiao et al. (2023) and Ou et al. (2024), the spherically distributed DM halo accounts for ≳ 88% of the total radial gravitational acceleration at R = 27 kpc”
From The rotation curve of the Milky Way: State of the art, the Keplerian decline debate, and implications for dark matter (2026) · cites this paper as Klačka & Šturc (2025)
Table 1 in §3.2 (p. 2) gives the Ou et al. best-fit model’s spherically symmetric components—bulge plus dark-matter halo—as 80.52% of total radial acceleration at R = 27.31 kpc. The halo alone therefore cannot account for at least 88% in that model. Section 3.1.1 (p. 1) gives a different quantity, a baryonic-to-total circular-velocity-squared ratio of 0.12 ± 0.02; the copy does not give a corresponding acceleration breakdown for Jiao et al. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. 2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition (Princeton University Press, Princeton)
- Chrobáková, Ž., Nagy, R., & López-Corredoira, M. 2022, A&A, 664, A58, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243296 · DOI
- Eilers, A.-C., Hogg, D. W., Rix, H.-W., & Ness, M. K. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 871, 120, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf648 · DOI · Paper page
- Mistele, T., McGaugh, S., Lelli, F., Schombert, J., & Li, P. 2024, ApJ, 969, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad54b0 · DOI
- Sylos Labini, F., Chrobáková, Ž., Capuzzo-Dolcetta, R., & López-Corredoira, M. 2023, ApJ, 945, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb92c · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Klačka, J., & Šturc, M.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2507.23551
- OpenAlex
- W4414921132
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- Milky Way rotation curve, gravitational potential, spiral galaxies, galaxy dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
