The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Training Long-Context, Multi-Turn Software Engineering Agents with Reinforcement Learning
Abstract
Research on applications of reinforcement learning (RL) to large language models has mostly been focused on single-turn problems, such as mathematical reasoning or single-shot code generation. While these problems can be viewed as token-level multi-turn Markov decision processes (MDPs), this view corresponds to a degenerate case of multi-turn interaction where the environment provides no feedback. This contrasts with many real-world domains, such as software engineering (SWE), which require rich multi-turn interactions with a stateful environment that responds to each action with a non-trivial observation. To bridge this gap, we demonstrate the successful application of RL to this general regime. Our methodology begins with rejection fine-tuning (RFT) using execution feedback to train a policy to follow instructions and formatting effectively, followed by a synchronous RL pipeline using DAPO for iterative improvement. Applying this pipeline to Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct, we increase its Pass@1 on the SWE-bench Verified benchmark from 11% to 39%, substantially improving upon the 20% RFT baseline. On the May and June splits of SWE-rebench, the resulting agent achieves Pass@1 of 35% and 31% respectively, competitive with even larger models such as DeepSeek-V3-0324 or Qwen3-235B-A22B, demonstrating that our methodology offers a practical approach for training capable agents for multi-turn interactive tasks using open-weight models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Decoupled Clip and Dynamic sAmpling Policy Optimization (DAPO) improves training stability and performance on SWE-bench Verified through multi-turn code generation and debugging interactions, leveraging long-context feedback (Golubev et al., 2025).”
From The landscape of agentic reinforcement learning for LLMs: a survey (2025) · cites this paper as Golubev et al., 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models
Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K., & Cao, Y. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.03629 · Cited by 608
Cited by
The landscape of agentic reinforcement learning for LLMs: a survey
Zhang, G., Geng, H., Yu, X., Yin, Z., Zhang, Z., Tan, Z., Zhou, H., Li, Z., Xue, X., Li, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.02547 · Cited by 229
SWE-Master: Unleashing the Potential of Software Engineering Agents via Post-Training
Song, H., Huang, L., Sun, S., Jiang, J., Le, R., Cheng, D., Chen, G., Hu, Y., Chen, Z., Jia, Y., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.03411
“To further bridge the gap between static training and dynamic interaction, DeepSWE [35] and SkyRL [8] incorporate agentic reinforcement learning [69, 10].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Golubev, A., Trofimova, M., Polezhaev, S., Badertdinov, I., Nekrashevich, M., Shevtsov, A., Karasik, S., Abramov, S., Andriushchenko, A., Fisin, F., Skvortsov, S., & Yangel, B.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- arXiv
- 2508.03501
- References
- 1
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Training Long-Context, Multi-Turn Software Engineering Agents with Reinforcement Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2508.03501
- The paper
- Golubev, A., Trofimova, M., Polezhaev, S., Badertdinov, I., Nekrashevich, M., Shevtsov, A., Karasik, S., Abramov, S., Andriushchenko, A., Fisin, F., Skvortsov, S., & Yangel, B. (2025). Training Long-Context, Multi-Turn Software Engineering Agents with Reinforcement Learning. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2508.03501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.