R-Zero: Self-Evolving Reasoning LLM from Zero Data
Open accessAbstract
Self-evolving Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a scalable path toward super-intelligence by autonomously generating, refining, and learning from their own experiences. However, existing methods for training such models still rely heavily on vast human-curated tasks and labels, typically via fine-tuning or reinforcement learning, which poses a fundamental bottleneck to advancing AI systems toward capabilities beyond human intelligence. To overcome this limitation, we introduce R-Zero, a fully autonomous framework that generates its own training data from scratch. Starting from a single base LLM, R-Zero initializes two independent models with distinct roles, a Challenger and a Solver. These models are optimized separately and co-evolve through interaction: the Challenger is rewarded for proposing tasks near the edge of the Solver capability, and the Solver is rewarded for solving increasingly challenging tasks posed by the Challenger. This process yields a targeted, self-improving curriculum without any pre-existing tasks and labels. Empirically, R-Zero substantially improves reasoning capability across different backbone LLMs, e.g., boosting the Qwen3-4B-Base by +6.49 on math-reasoning benchmarks and +7.54 on general-domain reasoning benchmarks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Absolute Zero and R-Zero, a Challenger learns to pose problems at the frontier of the Solver's competence and both co-evolve from a single base model with no human tasks at all.
“Absolute Zero [15] and R-Zero [16], where a Challenger learns to pose problems at the frontier of the Solver's competence and both co-evolve from a single base model with no human tasks at all”
From Recursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops (2026) · cites this paper as [16]
Recent approaches propose to dynamically synthesise training examples, often through LLM-based data generation, to create a surrogate dataset for iterative improvement.
“recent approaches (Huang et al., 2025; Zhao et al., 2025a; Liu et al., 2025b) propose to dynamically synthesise training examples, often through LLM-based data generation, to create a surrogate dataset for iterative improvement.”
From A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems (2025) · cites this paper as Huang et al., 2025
R-Zero employs a dual-mode framework in which a challenger generates tasks tailored to the solver's current competence, enabling both to evolve iteratively without external supervision.
“Similarly, R-Zero (Huang et al., 2025) employs a dual-mode framework in which a challenger generates tasks tailored to the solver's current competence, enabling both to evolve iteratively without external supervision.”
From A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems (2025) · cites this paper as Huang et al., 2025
Cites
Grattafiori, A., Dubey, A., Jauhri, A., Pandey, A., Kadian, A., Al-Dahle, A., Letman, A., Mathur, A., Schelten, A., Vaughan, A., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.21783 · Cited by 505 · cited 1× · see citing works
“1 models (Dubey et al., 2024), this comprehensive selection allows us to test our framework across different foundational architectures – Qwen vs. Llama.”
Self-citationAbsolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Data
Zhao, A., Wu, Y., Yue, Y., Wu, T., Xu, Q., Yue, Y., Lin, M., Wang, S., Wu, Q., Zheng, Z., et al. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“More advanced frameworks push autonomy further by learning to generate the problems themselves, creating an adaptive curriculum from a small seed of examples or from scratch (Zhao et al., 2025a; Li et al., 2025c; Zhou et al., 2025a; Fang et al., 2025).”
TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning
Zuo, Y., Zhang, K., Sheng, L., Qu, S., Cui, G., Zhu, X., Li, H., Zhang, Y., Long, X., Hua, E., et al. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fang, J., Peng, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Yi, X., Zhang, G., Xu, Y., Wu, B., Liu, S., Li, Z., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.07407 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationGao, H.-A., Geng, J., Hua, W., Hu, M., Juan, X., Liu, H., Liu, S., Qiu, J., Qi, X., Wu, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.21046 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The Red Queen Gödel Machine: Co-Evolving Agents and Their Evaluators
Iacob, A., Jovanović, A., Shen, W. F., Burkhardt, D., Kurmanji, M., Tastan, N., Sani, L., Venanzi, N. A. E., Nie, J., Odonnat, A., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.26294 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“C.2).”
Recursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops
Chen, M., Wang, L., & Qu, B. (2026) · arXiv
“Training in which the model generates its own tasks or opponents — proposer–solver loops, adversarial curricula — including the zero-data regime that starts from nothing but a base model [15, 16].”
PREPING: Zero-Task Agent Memory Construction via Self-Practice
Choi, Y., Park, S., Kang, M., Baek, J., & Hwang, S. J. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.13880
- Authors
- Huang, C., Yu, W., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Li, Z., Li, R., Huang, J., Mi, H., & Yu, D.
- ORCID
- Zhang, Hongming
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2508.05004
- OpenAlex
- W6929629322
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- task generation, mathematical reasoning, reasoning benchmarks, LLM-as-a-judge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review