PreprintCited by 1AI-based Problem Solving and PlanningRecommender Systems and TechniquesLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

REMI: A Novel Causal Schema Memory Architecture for Personalized Lifestyle Recommendation Agents

Open access
Raman, Vishal, R, Vijai Aravindh, Ragav, Abhijith·2025·arXiv

Abstract

Personalized AI assistants often struggle to incorporate complex personal data and causal knowledge, leading to generic advice that lacks explanatory power. We propose REMI, a Causal Schema Memory architecture for a multimodal lifestyle agent that integrates a personal causal knowledge graph, a causal reasoning engine, and a schema based planning module. The idea is to deliver explainable, personalized recommendations in domains like fashion, personal wellness, and lifestyle planning. Our architecture uses a personal causal graph of the user's life events and habits, performs goal directed causal traversals enriched with external knowledge and hypothetical reasoning, and retrieves adaptable plan schemas to generate tailored action plans. A Large Language Model orchestrates these components, producing answers with transparent causal explanations. We outline the CSM system design and introduce new evaluation metrics for personalization and explainability, including Personalization Salience Score and Causal Reasoning Accuracy, to rigorously assess its performance. Results indicate that CSM based agents can provide more context aware, user aligned recommendations compared to baseline LLM agents. This work demonstrates a novel approach to memory augmented, causal reasoning in personalized agents, advancing the development of transparent and trustworthy AI lifestyle assistants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2509.06269

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Memory mechanisms must transcend mere documentation of interactions to construct complex causal dependencies across time steps.

    “This necessitates that memory mechanisms transcend the mere documentation of interactions to construct dependencies for causality of a complex nature across steps in time (Majumder et al., 2023; Du et al., 2025c; Raman et al., 2025).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [1][1] S. Harsha Tanneru, C. Agarwal, and H. Lakkaraju, 'Quantifying uncertainty in natural language explanations of large language models,' in Proceedings of The 27th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, S. Dasgupta, S. Mandt, and Y. Li, Eds., vol. 238. PMLR, 02-04 May 2024, pp. 1072-1080. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v238/harsha-tanneru24a.html -
  2. [2][2] A. Subramanian, Z. Yang, I. Azimi, and A. M. Rahmani, 'Graph-augmented llms for personalized health insights: A case study in sleep analysis,' in 2024 IEEE 20th International Conference on Body Sensor Networks (BSN) , 2024, pp. 1-4. -
  3. [3][3] A. Halevy and J. Dwivedi-Yu, 'Learnings from data integration for augmented language models,' 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.04576 - · arXiv
  4. [4][4] S. Yao, J. Zhao, D. Yu, N. Du, I. Shafran, K. Narasimhan, and Y. Cao, 'React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models,' 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03629 - · arXiv
  5. [5][5] T. Schick, J. Dwivedi-Yu, R. Dessi, R. Raileanu, M. Lomeli, E. Hambro, L. Zettlemoyer, N. Cancedda, and T. Scialom, 'Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools,' in Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //openreview.net/forum?id=Yacmpz84TH -
  6. [6][6] P. Lewis, E. Perez, A. Piktus, F. Petroni, V. Karpukhin, N. Goyal, H. Küttler, M. Lewis, W.-t. Yih, T. Rocktäschel, S. Riedel, and D. Kiela, 'Retrievalaugmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks,' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. Balcan, and H. Lin, Eds., vol. 33. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020, pp. 9459-9474. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper\_files/paper/2020/file/ 6b493230205f780e1bc26945df7481e5-Paper.pdf -
  7. [7][7] S. Borgeaud, A. Mensch, J. Hoffmann, T. Cai, E. Rutherford, K. Millican, G. B. Van Den Driessche, J.-B. Lespiau, B. Damoc, A. Clark, D. De Las Casas, A. Guy, J. Menick, R. Ring, T. Hennigan, S. Huang, L. Maggiore, C. Jones, A. Cassirer, A. Brock, M. Paganini, G. Irving, O. Vinyals, S. Osindero, K. Simonyan, J. Rae, E. Elsen, and L. Sifre, 'Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokens,' in Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning , ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, K. Chaudhuri, S. Jegelka, L. Song, C. Szepesvari, G. Niu, and S. Sabato, Eds., vol. 162. PMLR, 17-23 Jul 2022, pp. 2206-2240. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v162/borgeaud22a.html -
  8. [8][8] U. Khandelwal, O. Levy, D. Jurafsky, L. Zettlemoyer, and M. Lewis, 'Generalization through memorization: Nearest neighbor language models,' in International Conference on Learning Representations , 2020. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=HklBjCEKvH -
  9. [9][9] W. Wang, F. Wei, L. Dong, H. Bao, N. Yang, and M. Zhou, 'Minilm: Deep selfattention distillation for task-agnostic compression of pre-trained transformers,' 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.10957 - · arXiv
  10. [10][10] M. Douze, A. Guzhva, C. Deng, J. Johnson, G. Szilvasy, P.-E. Mazaré, M. Lomeli, L. Hosseini, and H. Jégou, 'The faiss library,' 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.08281 - · arXiv
  11. [11][11] F. Doshi-Velez and B. Kim, 'Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning,' arXiv: Machine Learning , 2017. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:11319376

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raman, V., R, V. A., & Ragav, A.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414756463
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Keywords
causal knowledge graphs, causal reasoning, explainable AI, personalization, large language models, multimodal agents, fashion recommendation, personal well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review