CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 2Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Impact of quantum gravity on the UV sensitivity of extremal black holes

Open access
Del Porro, Francesco, Ferrarin, Francesco, Platania, Alessia·2025·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2509.07058arXiv 2509.07058

Preprint — published as 10.1002/prop.70101

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recent work has revealed that extremal Kerr black holes may exhibit a sensitivity to higher-derivative corrections to Einstein's equations, displaying singularities in the tidal forces at the horizon. However, in a purely gravitational context, this "ultraviolet sensitivity" translates into a strong dependence on the Wilson coefficients in the low-energy effective field theory. These, in turn, are fixed by the underlying theory of quantum gravity in the ultraviolet. We find a prediction for these coefficients within the framework of asymptotically safe quantum gravity, and show that, if the quantum gravity scale is trans-Planckian, this horizon-scale ultraviolet sensitivity is avoided.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2509.07058

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prescription (4.9) depends on the scale k0 and on g_IR; since k0 is arbitrary, using a different scale k0' ≠ m_Pl shifts the value of g_C2,IR according to eq. (4.11).

    “We remark that the prescription (4.9) depends on the scale k 0 and on g IR : while, by definition, G N ≡ g IR k -2 0 , the scale k 0 is arbitrary, and using a different scale k0 ̸ = m Pl would shift the value of g C 2 ,IR to [128]”

    From Charting GLOBs in asymptotically safe gravity (2026) · cites this paper as [128]

    Section III (p. 3) says the reference scale can be changed and that the Wilson coefficient shifts accordingly; it also relates the choice of g_IR to the transition scale. Section IV (p. 5) explicitly says changing k₀ shifts the IR Goroff–Sagnotti coupling. The paper identifies that coupling as g_C3, not the claimed g_C2, and the formula is undecoded in our copy, so the claimed equation-specific expression cannot be checked. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 94

  1. [2]G. T. Horowitz, M. Kolanowski, G. N. Remmen, and J. E. Santos, JHEP 05 , 122 (2024), arXiv:2403.00051 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  2. [3]C. Bambi, L. Modesto, and I. Shapiro, eds., Handbook of Quantum Gravity (Springer, 2024).
  3. [4]I. Basile, L. Buoninfante, F. D. Filippo, B. Knorr, A. Platania, and A. Tokareva, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 98 (2025), arXiv:2412.08690 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  4. [5]L. Buoninfante et al. , SciPost Phys. Comm. Rep. , 11 (2025), arXiv:2412.08696 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  5. [6]I. Basile and A. Platania, Universe 7 , 389 (2021), arXiv:2107.06897 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  6. [7]B. Knorr and A. Platania, JHEP 03 , 003 (2025), arXiv:2405.08860 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  7. [8]B. Knorr, C. Ripken, and F. Saueressig, 'Form Factors in Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity,' in Handbook of Quantum Gravity (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023) pp. 1-49, arXiv:2210.16072 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  8. [9]A. Eichhorn and M. Schiffer, 'Asymptotic safety of gravity with matter,' in Handbook of Quantum Gravity (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023) pp. 1-87, arXiv:2212.07456 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  9. [10]T. R. Morris and D. Stulga, 'The Functional f(R) Approximation,' in Handbook of Quantum Gravity (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023) pp. 1-33, arXiv:2210.11356 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  10. [11]R. Martini, G. P. Vacca, and O. Zanusso, 'Perturbative Approaches to Nonperturbative Quantum Gravity,' in Handbook of Quantum Gravity (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023) pp. 1-46, arXiv:2210.13910 [hepth]. · arXiv
  11. [12]C. Wetterich, 'Quantum Gravity and Scale Symmetry in Cosmology,' in Handbook of Quantum Gravity (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023) pp. 1-68, arXiv:2211.03596 [gr-qc]. · arXiv
  12. [13]A. Platania, 'Black Holes in Asymptotically Safe Gravity,' in Handbook of Quantum Gravity (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023) pp. 1-65, arXiv:2302.04272 [gr-qc]. · arXiv
  13. [14]F. Saueressig, 'The Functional Renormalization Group in Quantum Gravity,' in Handbook of Quantum Gravity (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023) pp. 1-44, arXiv:2302.14152 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  14. [15]J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert, 'Quantum Gravity from Dynamical Metric Fluctuations,' in Handbook of Quantum Gravity (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023) pp. 1-70, arXiv:2309.10785 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  15. [16]A. Bonanno, 'Asymptotic Safety and Cosmology,' in Handbook of Quantum Gravity (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023) pp. 1-27.
  16. [17]M. Reuter, Phys. Rev. D 57 , 971 (1998), arXiv:hepth/9605030.
  17. [18]M. Reuter and F. Saueressig, Phys. Rev. D 65 , 065016 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0110054. · arXiv
  18. [19]O. Lauscher and M. Reuter, Phys. Rev. D 66 , 025026 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0205062. · arXiv
  19. [20]A. Codello and R. Percacci, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 , 221301 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0607128. · arXiv
  20. [21]H. Gies, B. Knorr, and S. Lippoldt, Phys. Rev. D 92 , 084020 (2015), arXiv:1507.08859 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  21. [22]H. Gies, B. Knorr, S. Lippoldt, and F. Saueressig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 , 211302 (2016), arXiv:1601.01800 [hepth]. · arXiv
  22. [23]T. Denz, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Reichert, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 , 336 (2018), arXiv:1612.07315 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  23. [24]Y. Hamada and M. Yamada, JHEP 08 , 070 (2017), arXiv:1703.09033 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  24. [25]B. Knorr and S. Lippoldt, Phys. Rev. D 96 , 065020 (2017), arXiv:1707.01397 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  25. [26]N. Christiansen, K. Falls, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Reichert, Phys. Rev. D 97 , 046007 (2018), arXiv:1711.09259 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  26. [27]K. Falls, C. R. King, D. F. Litim, K. Nikolakopoulos, and C. Rahmede, Phys. Rev. D 97 , 086006 (2018), arXiv:1801.00162 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  27. [28]K. Falls, N. Ohta, and R. Percacci, Phys. Lett. B 810 , 135773 (2020), arXiv:2004.04126 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  28. [29]B. Knorr, SciPost Phys. Core 4 , 020 (2021), arXiv:2104.11336 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  29. [30]Y. Kluth and D. F. Litim, Phys. Rev. D 106 , 106022 (2022), arXiv:2202.10436 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  30. [31]A. Baldazzi, K. Falls, Y. Kluth, and B. Knorr, (2023), arXiv:2312.03831 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  31. [32]P. Donà, A. Eichhorn, and R. Percacci, Phys. Rev. D 89 , 084035 (2014), arXiv:1311.2898 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  32. [33]N. Christiansen, D. F. Litim, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Reichert, Phys. Rev. D 97 , 106012 (2018), arXiv:1710.04669 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  33. [34]Á. Pastor-Gutiérrez, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Reichert, SciPost Phys. 15 , 105 (2023), arXiv:2207.09817 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  34. [35]G. P. De Brito, N. Ohta, A. D. Pereira, A. A. Tomaz, and M. Yamada, Phys. Rev. D 98 , 026027 (2018), arXiv:1805.09656 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  35. [36]Y. Kluth and D. F. Litim, Phys. Rev. D 108 , 026005 (2023), arXiv:2008.09181 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  36. [37]A. Shomer, (2007), arXiv:0709.3555 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  37. [38]A. Platania, Gen. Rel. Grav. 57 , 58 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-025-03390-5 · DOI
  38. [39]I. Basile, B. Knorr, A. Platania, and M. Schiffer, (2025), arXiv:2502.12290 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  39. [40]M. Shaposhnikov and C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. B 683 , 196 (2010), arXiv:0912.0208 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  40. [41]A. Eichhorn and A. Held, Phys. Lett. B 777 , 217 (2018), arXiv:1707.01107 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  41. [42]A. Eichhorn and F. Versteegen, JHEP 01 , 030 (2018), arXiv:1709.07252 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  42. [43]A. Eichhorn and A. Held, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 , 151302 (2018), arXiv:1803.04027 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  43. [44]A. Eichhorn, Z. Gyftopoulos, and A. Held, (2025), arXiv:2507.18304 [hep-ph]. · arXiv
  44. [45]R. Percacci and G. P. Vacca, Class. Quant. Grav. 27 , 245026 (2010), arXiv:1008.3621 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  45. [46]S. de Alwis, A. Eichhorn, A. Held, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Schiffer, and F. Versteegen, Phys. Lett. B 798 , 134991 (2019), arXiv:1907.07894 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  46. [47]A. Held, Front. in Phys. 8 , 341 (2020), arXiv:2003.13642 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  47. [48]J. F. Donoghue and B. K. El-Menoufi, JHEP 05 , 118 (2015), arXiv:1503.06099 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  48. [49]J. F. Donoghue and G. Menezes, Phys. Rev. D 97 , 126005 (2018), arXiv:1804.04980 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  49. [50]J. F. Donoghue and G. Menezes, Phys. Rev. D 100 , 105006 (2019), arXiv:1908.02416 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  50. [53]A. E. M. van de Ven, Nucl. Phys. B 378 , 309 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(9290011-Y) · DOI
  51. [54]E. Manrique, S. Rechenberger, and F. Saueressig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 , 251302 (2011), arXiv:1102.5012 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  52. [55]J. Biemans, A. Platania, and F. Saueressig, Phys. Rev. D 95 , 086013 (2017), arXiv:1609.04813 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  53. [56]J. Biemans, A. Platania, and F. Saueressig, JHEP 05 , 093 (2017), arXiv:1702.06539 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  54. [57]B. Knorr, Phys. Lett. B 792 , 142 (2019), arXiv:1810.07971 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  55. [58]A. Eichhorn, A. Platania, and M. Schiffer, Phys. Rev. D 102 , 026007 (2020), arXiv:1911.10066 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  56. [59]A. Bonanno, T. Denz, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Reichert, SciPost Phys. 12 , 001 (2022), arXiv:2102.02217 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  57. [60]J. Fehre, D. F. Litim, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Reichert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 , 081501 (2023), arXiv:2111.13232 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  58. [61]R. Banerjee and M. Niedermaier, Nucl. Phys. B 980 , 115814 (2022), arXiv:2201.02575 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  59. [62]E. D'Angelo, N. Drago, N. Pinamonti, and K. Rejzner, Annales Henri Poincare 25 , 2295 (2024), arXiv:2202.07580 [math-ph]. · arXiv
  60. [63]E. D'Angelo and K. Rejzner, 'A Lorentzian renormalisation group equation for gauge theories,' (2023), arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2303.01479 [math-ph]. · arXiv
  61. [64]J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert, and J. Wessely, (2025), arXiv:2507.22169 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  62. [65]V. Kher, B. King, D. F. Litim, and M. Reichert, (2025), arXiv:2507.17862 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  63. [66]A. Baldazzi, R. B. A. Zinati, and K. Falls, SciPost Phys. 13 , 085 (2022), arXiv:2105.11482 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  64. [67]A. Baldazzi and K. Falls, Universe 7 , 294 (2021), arXiv:2107.00671 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  65. [68]B. Knorr, Phys. Rev. D 110 , 026001 (2024), arXiv:2311.12097 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  66. [70]R. Percacci, An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety , 100 Years of General Relativity, Vol. 3 (World Scientific, 2017).
  67. [71]N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rept. 910 , 1 (2021), arXiv:2006.04853 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. · arXiv
  68. [72]A. Bonanno, A. Eichhorn, H. Gies, J. M. Pawlowski, R. Percacci, M. Reuter, F. Saueressig, and G. P. Vacca, Front. in Phys. 8 , 269 (2020), arXiv:2004.06810 [gr-qc]. · arXiv
  69. [73]D. Buccio, J. F. Donoghue, and R. Percacci, Phys. Rev. D 109 , 045008 (2024), arXiv:2307.00055 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  70. [74]D. Buccio, J. F. Donoghue, G. Menezes, and R. Percacci, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 , 021604 (2024), arXiv:2403.02397 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  71. [75]B. Knorr, C. Ripken, and F. Saueressig, Class. Quant. Grav. 36 , 234001 (2019), arXiv:1907.02903 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  72. [76]T. Draper, B. Knorr, C. Ripken, and F. Saueressig, JHEP 11 , 136 (2020), arXiv:2007.04396 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  73. [77]B. Knorr, C. Ripken, and F. Saueressig, Nuovo Cim. C 45 , 28 (2022), arXiv:2111.12365 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  74. [78]L. Alberte, C. de Rham, S. Jaitly, and A. J. Tolley, Phys. Rev. D 102 , 125023 (2020), arXiv:2007.12667 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  75. [79]M. Herrero-Valea, R. Santos-Garcia, and A. Tokareva, Phys. Rev. D 104 , 085022 (2021), arXiv:2011.11652 [hepth]. · arXiv
  76. [80]M. Herrero-Valea, A. S. Koshelev, and A. Tokareva, Phys. Rev. D 106 , 105002 (2022), arXiv:2205.13332 [hepth]. · arXiv
  77. [81]J. Henriksson, B. McPeak, F. Russo, and A. Vichi, JHEP 08 , 184 (2022), arXiv:2203.08164 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  78. [82]A. Tokareva and Y. Xu, (2025), arXiv:2502.10375 [hepth]. · arXiv
  79. [83]K. Falls, D. F. Litim, K. Nikolakopoulos, and C. Rahmede, Phys. Rev. D 93 , 104022 (2016), arXiv:1410.4815 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  80. [84]I. Basile and A. Platania, JHEP 06 , 045 (2021), arXiv:2101.02226 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  81. [85]I. Basile and A. Platania, Phys. Rev. D 104 , L121901 (2021), arXiv:2103.06276 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  82. [86]I. Basile, D. Lüst, and C. Montella, JHEP 07 , 208 (2024), arXiv:2311.12113 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  83. [87]A. Castellano, A. Herráez, and L. E. Ibáñez, JHEP 12 , 019 (2024), arXiv:2310.07708 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  84. [88]I. Basile, N. Cribiori, D. Lust, and C. Montella, JHEP 06 , 127 (2024), arXiv:2401.06851 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  85. [89]A. Bedroya, R. K. Mishra, and M. Wiesner, JHEP 01 , 144 (2025), arXiv:2405.00083 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  86. [90]C. Aoufia, I. Basile, and G. Leone, JHEP 12 , 111 (2024), arXiv:2405.03683 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  87. [91]C. Y. R. Chen, C. de Rham, and A. J. Tolley, Phys. Rev. D 111 , 024056 (2025), arXiv:2408.05549 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  88. [92]N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis, and C. Vafa, JHEP 06 , 060 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0601001. · arXiv
  89. [93]T. Banks, M. Johnson, and A. Shomer, JHEP 09 , 049 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0606277. · arXiv
  90. [94]D. Harlow, B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95 , 035003 (2023), arXiv:2201.08380 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  91. [95]C. Cheung, J. Liu, and G. N. Remmen, JHEP 10 , 004 (2018), arXiv:1801.08546 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  92. [96]Y. Hamada, T. Noumi, and G. Shiu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 , 051601 (2019), arXiv:1810.03637 [hep-th]. · arXiv
  93. [97][A. Urbano, (2018), arXiv:1810.05621 [hep-th].](http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.05621) · arXiv
  94. [98]B. Heidenreich and M. Lotito, JHEP 05 , 102 (2025), arXiv:2401.14449 [hep-th]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Del Porro, F., Ferrarin, F., & Platania, A.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Ferrarin, Francesco
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
Volume
74
Issue
4
ISSN
0015-8208 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2509.07058
arXiv
2509.07058
OpenAlex
W4416064162
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Fortschritte der Physik (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Villum Fonden (VIL60819)
  • National Research Foundation
  • Danmarks Grundforskningsfond
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
quantum gravity, extremal black holes, rotating black holes, UV sensitivity, tidal forces, higher-derivative corrections, Wilson coefficients, asymptotically safe gravity, effective field theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review