PreprintCited by 62Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorRobot Manipulation and Learning

ScaleCUA: Scaling Open-Source Computer Use Agents with Cross-Platform Data

Open access
Liu, Zhaoyang, Xie, Jingjing, Ding, Zichen, Li, Zehao, Yang, Bowen, Wu, Zhenyu, Wang, Xuehui, Sun, Qiushi +22 more·2025·arXiv

Abstract

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have enabled computer use agents (CUAs) that operate GUIs autonomously, showing great potential, yet progress is limited by the lack of large-scale, open-source computer use data and foundation models. In this work, we introduce ScaleCUA, a step toward scaling open-source CUAs. It offers a large-scale dataset spanning 6 operating systems and 3 task domains, built via a closed-loop pipeline uniting automated agents with human experts. Trained on this scaled-up data, ScaleCUA can operate seamlessly across platforms. Specifically, it delivers strong gains over baselines (+26.6 on WebArena-Lite-v2, +10.7 on ScreenSpot-Pro) and sets new state-of-the-art results (94.4% on MMBench-GUI L1-Hard, 60.6% on OSWorld-G, 47.4% on WebArena-Lite-v2). These findings underscore the power of data-driven scaling for general-purpose computer use agents. We will release data, models, and code to advance future research: https://github.com/OpenGVLab/ScaleCUA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2509.15221

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Native GUI agents demonstrate proficiency in digital navigation but suffer from poor error recovery in stochastic environments, often failing when deviating from expert trajectories.

    “they suffer from poor error recovery in stochastic environments, often failing when deviating from expert trajectories”

    From OS-Themis: A Scalable Critic Framework for Generalist GUI Rewards (2026) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2025

    Figure 6 (p. 26) shows ScaleCUA repeatedly taking an ineffective action after missing a GUI element, supporting a concern about error recovery. But A.5.6 describes stochasticity in rule-driven data-collection agents, not stochastic environments in which native GUI agents fail; the cited passages do not link failures to deviations from expert trajectories or establish the claim for native GUI agents generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Z., Xie, J., Ding, Z., Li, Z., Yang, B., Wu, Z., Wang, X., Sun, Q., Liu, S., Wang, W., Ye, S., Li, Q., Dong, X., Yu, Y., Lu, C., Mo, Y., Yan, Y., Tian, Z., Zhang, X., Huang, Y., Liu, Y., Su, W., Luo, G., Yue, X., Qi, B., Chen, K., Zhou, B., Qiao, Y., Chen, Q., & Wang, W.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414691912
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
Keywords
computer-use agents, vision-language models, open-source dataset, operating systems, WebArena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review