Machine Learning the Dark Matter Halo Mass of the Milky Way
Open accessAbstract
Although numerous dynamical techniques have been developed to estimate the total dark matter halo mass of the Milky Way, it remains poorly constrained, with typical systematic uncertainties of 0.3 dex. In this study, we apply a neural network-based approach that achieves high mass precision without several limitations that have affected past approaches; for example, we do not assume dynamical equilibrium, nor do we assume that neighboring galaxies are bound satellites. Additionally, this method works for a broad mass range, including for halos that differ significantly from the Milky Way. Our model relies solely on observable dynamical quantities, such as satellite orbits, distances to larger nearby halos, and the maximum circular velocity of the most massive satellite. In this paper, we measure the halo mass of the Milky Way to be log_10 M_vir / M_Sun = 12.20^{+0.163}_{-0.138}. Future studies in this series will extend this methodology to estimate the dark matter halo mass of M31, and develop new neural networks to infer additional halo properties including concentration, assembly history, and spin axis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hayati et al. (2025) obtain log10(M_vir/M⊙) = 12.20 +0.16 -0.14, i.e. M_vir ≈ 1.6 × 10^12 M⊙.
“They obtain log 10 ( M vir / M ⊙ ) = 12 . 20 + 0 . 16 -0 . 14 , i.e. M vir ≈ 1 . 6 × 10 12 M ⊙”
From The rotation curve of the Milky Way: State of the art, the Keplerian decline debate, and implications for dark matter (2026) · cites this paper as Hayati et al. (2025)
Hayati et al. (2025) use a neural-network approach to infer the MW halo mass from the dynamics of its satellite system without assuming dynamical equilibrium or that all neighbouring galaxies are bound satellites.
“A recent independent constraint comes from Hayati et al. (2025), who use a neural-network approach to infer the MW halo mass from the dynamics of its satellite system without assuming dynamical equilibrium or that all neighbouring galaxies are bound satellites.”
From The rotation curve of the Milky Way: State of the art, the Keplerian decline debate, and implications for dark matter (2026) · cites this paper as Hayati et al. (2025)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Bowden H., Behroozi P., Hearin A., 2023, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 6, 37
- Geha M., et al., 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 847, 4
- Hayati E., Behroozi P., Patel E., 2024, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 7, 74
- Jiao Y., Hammer F., Wang H., Wang J., Yang Y., 2023, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2306.05461 · arXiv
- Kravtsov A., Winney S., 2024, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 7, 50 Li Y.-S., White S. D. M., 2008, MNRAS, 384, 1459
- Mao Y.-Y., et al., 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 907, 85
- Oort J. H., 1926, PhD thesis, -
- Wan J. T., Mansfield P., Suess K. A., Wang Y., Yuan S., Williams C. C., Wechsler R. H., 2025, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2507.13448 · arXiv
- Wang Y., et al., 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, XXX, XX
- Authors
- Hayati, E., Behroozi, P., Patel, E., Wang, Y., Gottlöber, S., & Yepes, G.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2509.25362
- OpenAlex
- W4414813424
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- artificial neural networks, satellite orbits, satellite galaxies, halo mass estimation, dynamic equilibrium, M31, halo concentration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
