Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Preprint

The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Open Agent Specification (Agent Spec): A Unified Representation for AI Agents

Amini, Soufiane, Benajiba, Yassine, Bernardis, Cesare, Cayet, Paul, Chafi, Hassan, Fathan, Abderrahim, Faucon, Louis, Hilloulin, Damien, Hong, Sungpack, Kossyk, Ingo, Le, Tran Minh Son, Patra, Rhicheek, Ravi, Sujith, Schweizer, Jonas, Singh, Jyotika, Singh, Shailender, Sun, Weiyi, Talamadupula, Kartik, Xu, Jerry·2025·arXiv

Abstract

The proliferation of agent frameworks has led to fragmentation in how agents are defined, executed, and evaluated. Existing systems differ in their abstractions, data flow semantics, and tool integrations, making it difficult to share or reproduce workflows. We introduce Open Agent Specification (Agent Spec), a declarative language that defines AI agents and agentic workflows in a way that is compatible across frameworks, promoting reusability, portability and interoperability of AI agents. Agent Spec defines a common set of components, control and data flow semantics, and schemas that allow an agent to be defined once and executed across different runtimes. Agent Spec also introduces a standardized Evaluation harness to assess agent behavior and agentic workflows across runtimes - analogous to how HELM and related harnesses standardized LLM evaluation - so that performance, robustness, and efficiency can be compared consistently across frameworks. We demonstrate this using four distinct runtimes (LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen, and WayFlow) evaluated over three different benchmarks (SimpleQA Verified, $τ^2$-Bench and BIRD-SQL). We provide accompanying toolsets: a Python SDK (PyAgentSpec), a reference runtime (WayFlow), and adapters for popular frameworks (e.g., LangGraph, AutoGen, CrewAI). Agent Spec bridges the gap between model-centric and agent-centric standardization & evaluation, laying the groundwork for reliable, reusable, and portable agentic systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2510.04173

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Amini, S., Benajiba, Y., Bernardis, C., Cayet, P., Chafi, H., Fathan, A., Faucon, L., Hilloulin, D., Hong, S., Kossyk, I., Le, T. M. S., Patra, R., Ravi, S., Schweizer, J., Singh, J., Singh, S., Sun, W., Talamadupula, K., & Xu, J.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Open Agent Specification (Agent Spec): A Unified Representation for AI Agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2510.04173
The paper
Amini, S., Benajiba, Y., Bernardis, C., Cayet, P., Chafi, H., Fathan, A., Faucon, L., Hilloulin, D., Hong, S., Kossyk, I., Le, T. M. S., Patra, R., Ravi, S., Schweizer, J., Singh, J., Singh, S., Sun, W., Talamadupula, K., & Xu, J. (2025). Open Agent Specification (Agent Spec): A Unified Representation for AI Agents. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2510.04173

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.