PreprintCited by 0Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningSpeech and dialogue systems

Agent Learning via Early Experience

Open access
Zhang, Kai, Chen, Xiangchao, Liu, Bo, Xue, Tianci, Liao, Zeyi, Liu, Zhihan, Wang, Xiyao, Ning, Yuting +22 more·2025·arXiv

Abstract

A long-term goal of language agents is to learn and improve through their own experience, ultimately outperforming humans in complex, real-world tasks. However, training agents from experience data with reinforcement learning remains difficult in many environments, which either lack verifiable rewards (e.g., websites) or require inefficient long-horizon rollouts (e.g., multi-turn tool use). As a result, most current agents rely on supervised fine-tuning on expert data, which is challenging to scale and generalizes poorly. This limitation stems from the nature of expert demonstrations: they capture only a narrow range of scenarios, and expose the agent to limited environment diversity. We address this limitation with a middle-ground paradigm we call early experience: interaction data generated by the agent's own actions, where the resulting future states serve as supervision without reward signals. Within this paradigm, we study two strategies of using such data: (1) implicit world modeling, which uses collected states to ground the policy in environment dynamics; and (2) self-reflection, where the agent learns from its suboptimal actions to improve reasoning and decision-making. Evaluation across eight diverse environments and multiple model families shows that our approaches consistently improve effectiveness and out-of-domain generalization, highlighting the value of early experience. Moreover, in environments with verifiable rewards, our results provide promising signals that early experience offers a strong foundation for subsequent reinforcement learning, making it a practical bridge between imitation learning and fully experience-driven agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2510.08558

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experience-driven learning has received particular attention, exploring how diverse forms of generated experience can guide subsequent behavior and policy updates.

    “Among them, experience-driven learning has received particular attention, exploring how diverse forms of generated experience-such as online interactions, historical trajectories, curated replay, and task-specific evaluation loops-can guide subsequent behavior and policy updates [279-281].”

    From A Survey of Large Language Models (2026) · cites this paper as [279]

    The Introduction and §4 explain that agents can turn outcomes of their own actions into learning signals that improve later decisions and policies. This supports the claim’s core point, but the paper studies early experience and two ways to use it; it does not establish the full range of generated-experience forms listed in the citing sentence, such as curated replay and task-specific evaluation loops. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Research works printed but not linked: 78

  1. Marcin Andrychowicz, Filip Wolski, Alex Ray, Jonas Schneider, Rachel Fong, Peter Welinder, Bob McGrew, Josh Tobin, OpenAI Pieter Abbeel, and Wojciech Zaremba. Hindsight experience replay. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  2. Richard Bellman. A markovian decision process. Journal of mathematics and mechanics, pages 679-684, 1957.
  3. Greg Brockman, Vicki Cheung, Ludwig Pettersson, Jonas Schneider, John Schulman, Jie Tang, and Wojciech Zaremba. Openai gym. arXiv preprint, abs/1606.01540, 2016. · arXiv
  4. Hyungjoo Chae, Namyoung Kim, Kai Tzu iunn Ong, Minju Gwak, Gwanwoo Song, Jihoon Kim, Sunghwan Kim, Dongha Lee, and Jinyoung Yeo. Web agents with world models: Learning and leveraging environment dynamics in web navigation. In ICLR, 2025.
  5. Ziru Chen, Shijie Chen, Yuting Ning, Qianheng Zhang, Boshi Wang, Botao Yu, Yifei Li, Zeyi Liao, Chen Wei, Zitong Lu, Vishal Dey, Mingyi Xue, Frazier N. Baker, Benjamin Burns, Daniel Adu-Ampratwum, Xuhui Huang, Xia Ning, Song Gao, Yu Su, and Huan Sun. Scienceagentbench: Toward rigorous assessment of language agents for data-driven scientific discovery. In ICLR, 2025.
  6. Tianzhe Chu, Yuexiang Zhai, Jihan Yang, Shengbang Tong, Saining Xie, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V Le, Sergey Levine, and Yi Ma. SFT memorizes, RL generalizes: A comparative study of foundation model post-training. In ICML, 2025.
  7. Marc-Alexandre Côté, Ákos Kádár, Xingdi Yuan, Ben Kybartas, Tavian Barnes, Emery Fine, James Moore, Ruo Yu Tao, Matthew Hausknecht, Layla El Asri, Mahmoud Adada, Wendy Tay, and Adam Trischler. Textworld: A learning environment for text-based games. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.11532, 2019. · arXiv
  8. Xiang Deng, Yu Gu, Boyuan Zheng, Shijie Chen, Samual Stevens, Boshi Wang, Huan Sun, and Yu Su. Mind2web: Towards a generalist agent for the web. In NeurIPS, 2023.
  9. Lang Feng, Zhenghai Xue, Tingcong Liu, and Bo An. Group-in-group policy optimization for llm agent training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10978, 2025. · arXiv
  10. Hiroki Furuta, Kuang-Huei Lee, Ofir Nachum, Yutaka Matsuo, Aleksandra Faust, Shixiang Shane Gu, and Izzeddin Gur. Multimodal web navigation with instruction-finetuned foundation models. In ICLR, 2024.
  11. Anna Goldie, Azalia Mirhoseini, Hao Zhou, Irene Cai, and Christopher D Manning. Synthetic data generation & multi-step rl for reasoning & tool use. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.04736, 2025. · arXiv
  12. Yu Gu, Yiheng Shu, Hao Yu, Xiao Liu, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang, Jayanth Srinivasa, Hugo Latapie, and Yu Su. Middleware for LLMs: Tools are instrumental for language agents in complex environments. In EMNLP, 2024.
  13. Yu Gu, Kai Zhang, Yuting Ning, Boyuan Zheng, Boyu Gou, Tianci Xue, Cheng Chang, Sanjari Srivastava, Yanan Xie, Peng Qi, Huan Sun, and Yu Su. Is your llm secretly a world model of the internet? model-based planning for web agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.06559, 2025. · arXiv
  14. David Ha and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Recurrent world models facilitate policy evolution. In NeurIPS, 2018.
  15. Danijar Hafner, Timothy Lillicrap, Jimmy Ba, and Mohammad Norouzi. Dream to control: Learning behaviors by latent imagination. In ICLR, 2020.
  16. Danijar Hafner, Timothy P Lillicrap, Mohammad Norouzi, and Jimmy Ba. Mastering atari with discrete world models. In ICLR, 2021.
  17. Shibo Hao, Yi Gu, Haodi Ma, Joshua Hong, Zhen Wang, Daisy Wang, and Zhiting Hu. Reasoning with language model is planning with world model. In EMNLP, 2023.
  18. Xanh Ho, Anh-Khoa Duong Nguyen, Saku Sugawara, and Akiko Aizawa. Constructing a multi-hop QA dataset for comprehensive evaluation of reasoning steps. In ACL, 2020.
  19. Wenyi Hong, Weihan Wang, Qingsong Lv, Jiazheng Xu, Wenmeng Yu, Junhui Ji, Yan Wang, Zihan Wang, Yuxiao Dong, Ming Ding, and Jie Tang. Cogagent: A visual language model for gui agents. In CVPR, 2024.
  20. Edward J Hu, yelong shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In ICLR, 2022.
  21. Jiaxin Huang, Shixiang Gu, Le Hou, Yuexin Wu, Xuezhi Wang, Hongkun Yu, and Jiawei Han. Large language models can self-improve. In EMNLP, 2023.
  22. Jie Huang, Xinyun Chen, Swaroop Mishra, Huaixiu Steven Zheng, Adams Yu, Xinying Song, and Denny Zhou. Large language models cannot self-correct reasoning yet. In ICLR, 2024.
  23. Ahmed Hussein, Mohamed Medhat Gaber, Eyad Elyan, and Chrisina Jayne. Imitation learning: A survey of learning methods. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(2):1-35, 2017.
  24. Bowen Jin, Hansi Zeng, Zhenrui Yue, Jinsung Yoon, Sercan Arik, Dong Wang, Hamed Zamani, and Jiawei Han. Search- r1: Training llms to reason and leverage search engines with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09516, 2025. · arXiv
  25. Jing Yu Koh, Stephen McAleer, Daniel Fried, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. Tree search for language model agents. ArXiv preprint, abs/2407.01476, 2024. · arXiv
  26. Xiao Liu, Tianjie Zhang, Yu Gu, Iat Long Iong, Yifan Xu, Xixuan Song, Shudan Zhang, Hanyu Lai, Xinyi Liu, Hanlin Zhao, et al. Visualagentbench: Towards large multimodal models as visual foundation agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06327, 2024. · arXiv
  27. Xiao Liu, Tianjie Zhang, Yu Gu, Iat Long Iong, Song XiXuan, Yifan Xu, Shudan Zhang, Hanyu Lai, Jiadai Sun, Xinyue Yang, Yu Yang, Zehan Qi, Shuntian Yao, Xueqiao Sun, Siyi Cheng, Qinkai Zheng, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Wenyi Hong, Ming Ding, Lihang Pan, Xiaotao Gu, Aohan Zeng, Zhengxiao Du, Chan Hee Song, Yu Su, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. Visualagentbench: Towards large multimodal models as visual foundation agents. In ICLR, 2025.
  28. Renze Lou, Hanzi Xu, Sijia Wang, Jiangshu Du, Ryo Kamoi, Xiaoxin Lu, Jian Xie, Yuxuan Sun, Yusen Zhang, Jihyun Janice Ahn, Hongchao Fang, Zhuoyang Zou, Wenchao Ma, Xi Li, Kai Zhang, Congying Xia, Lifu Huang, and Wenpeng Yin. AAAR-1.0: Assessing ai's potential to assist research. In ICML, 2025.
  29. Aman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan, Luyu Gao, Sarah Wiegreffe, Uri Alon, Nouha Dziri, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Yiming Yang, Shashank Gupta, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Katherine Hermann, Sean Welleck, Amir Yazdanbakhsh, and Peter Clark. Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback. In NeurIPS, 2023.
  30. Sami Marreed, Alon Oved, Avi Yaeli, Segev Shlomov, Ido Levy, Offer Akrabi, Aviad Sela, Asaf Adi, and Nir Mashkif. Towards enterprise-ready computer using generalist agent. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.01861, 2025. · arXiv
  31. Volodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Alex Graves, Ioannis Antonoglou, Daan Wierstra, and Martin A. Riedmiller. Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1312.5602, 2013. · arXiv
  32. Shikhar Murty, Christopher D. Manning, Peter Shaw, Mandar Joshi, and Kenton Lee. Bagel: bootstrapping agents by guiding exploration with language. In ICML, 2024.
  33. Vardaan Pahuja, Yadong Lu, Corby Rosset, Boyu Gou, Arindam Mitra, Spencer Whitehead, Yu Su, and Ahmed Awadallah. Explorer: Scaling exploration-driven web trajectory synthesis for multimodal web agents. In Findings of ACL, 2025.
  34. Shishir G Patil, Huanzhi Mao, Fanjia Yan, Charlie Cheng-Jie Ji, Vishnu Suresh, Ion Stoica, and Joseph E. Gonzalez. The berkeley function calling leaderboard (BFCL): From tool use to agentic evaluation of large language models. In ICML, 2025.
  35. Dean A Pomerleau. Efficient training of artificial neural networks for autonomous navigation. Neural computation, 3 (1):88-97, 1991.
  36. Akshara Prabhakar, Zuxin Liu, Ming Zhu, Jianguo Zhang, Tulika Awalgaonkar, Shiyu Wang, Zhiwei Liu, Haolin Chen, Thai Hoang, Juan Carlos Niebles, Shelby Heinecke, Weiran Yao, Huan Wang, Silvio Savarese, and Caiming Xiong. Apigen-mt: Agentic pipeline for multi-turn data generation via simulated agent-human interplay. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.03601, 2025. · arXiv
  37. Ofir Press, Muru Zhang, Sewon Min, Ludwig Schmidt, Noah A Smith, and Mike Lewis. Measuring and narrowing the compositionality gap in language models. In Findings of EMNLP, 2022.
  38. Zehan Qi, Xiao Liu, Iat Long Iong, Hanyu Lai, Xueqiao Sun, Wenyi Zhao, Yu Yang, Xinyue Yang, Jiadai Sun, Shuntian Yao, et al. Webrl: Training llm web agents via self-evolving online curriculum reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.02337, 2024. · arXiv
  39. Zehan Qi, Xiao Liu, Iat Long Iong, Hanyu Lai, Xueqiao Sun, Jiadai Sun, Xinyue Yang, Yu Yang, Shuntian Yao, Wei Xu, Jie Tang, and Yuxiao Dong. WebRL: Training LLM web agents via self-evolving online curriculum reinforcement learning. In ICLR, 2025.
  40. Cheng Qian, Emre Can Acikgoz, Qi He, Hongru Wang, Xiusi Chen, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Gokhan Tur, and Heng Ji. Toolrl: Reward is all tool learning needs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13958, 2025. · arXiv
  41. Stéphane Ross and Drew Bagnell. Efficient reductions for imitation learning. In Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, pages 661-668. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 2010.
  42. Stéphane Ross, Geoffrey Gordon, and Drew Bagnell. A reduction of imitation learning and structured prediction to no-regret online learning. In Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, pages 627-635. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 2011.
  43. Stuart J. Russell and Peter Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, 1 edition, 1995. ISBN 0-13-103805-2.
  44. Stefan Schaal. Learning from demonstration. NeurIPS, 1996.
  45. Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Thomas Hubert, Karen Simonyan, Laurent Sifre, Simon Schmitt, Arthur Guez, Edward Lockhart, Demis Hassabis, Thore Graepel, et al. Mastering atari, go, chess and shogi by planning with a learned model. Nature, 588(7839):604-609, 2020.
  46. Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song, Xiao Bi, Haowei Zhang, Mingchuan Zhang, Y. K. Li, Y. Wu, and Daya Guo. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300, 2024. · arXiv
  47. Junhong Shen, Atishay Jain, Zedian Xiao, Ishan Amlekar, Mouad Hadji, Aaron Podolny, and Ameet Talwalkar. Scribeagent: Towards specialized web agents using production-scale workflow data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15004, 2024. · arXiv
  48. Guangming Sheng, Chi Zhang, Zilingfeng Ye, Xibin Wu, Wang Zhang, Ru Zhang, Yanghua Peng, Haibin Lin, and Chuan Wu. Hybridflow: A flexible and efficient RLHF framework. In EuroSys, 2025.
  49. Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik R Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. In NeurIPS, 2023.
  50. Mohit Shridhar, Xingdi Yuan, Marc-Alexandre Cote, Yonatan Bisk, Adam Trischler, and Matthew Hausknecht. {ALFW}orld: Aligning text and embodied environments for interactive learning. In ICLR, 2021.
  51. Charlie Snell, Jaehoon Lee, Kelvin Xu, and Aviral Kumar. Scaling llm test-time compute optimally can be more effective than scaling model parameters. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03314, 2024. · arXiv
  52. Hongjin Su, Ruoxi Sun, Jinsung Yoon, Pengcheng Yin, Tao Yu, and Sercan Ö Arık. Learn-by-interact: A data-centric framework for self-adaptive agents in realistic environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.10893, 2025. · arXiv
  53. Yu Su, Diyi Yang, Shunyu Yao, and Tao Yu. Language agents: Foundations, prospects, and risks. In EMNLP: Tutorial, 2024.
  54. Richard S Sutton. Dyna, an integrated architecture for learning, planning, and reacting. ACM Sigart Bulletin, 2(4): 160-163, 1991.
  55. Richard S Sutton, Andrew G Barto, et al. Reinforcement learning: An introduction, volume 1. MIT press Cambridge, 1998.
  56. Harsh Trivedi, Niranjan Balasubramanian, Tushar Khot, and Ashish Sabharwal. Musique: Multihop questions via single-hop question composition. TACL, 2022.
  57. Harsh Trivedi, Tushar Khot, Mareike Hartmann, Ruskin Manku, Vinty Dong, Edward Li, Shashank Gupta, Ashish Sabharwal, and Niranjan Balasubramanian. AppWorld: A controllable world of apps and people for benchmarking interactive coding agents. In ACL, 2024.
  58. Karthik Valmeekam, Matthew Marquez, and Subbarao Kambhampati. Investigating the effectiveness of self-critiquing in LLMs solving planning tasks. In NeurIPS 2023 Foundation Models for Decision Making Workshop, 2023.
  59. Ruoyao Wang, Peter Jansen, Marc-Alexandre Côté, and Prithviraj Ammanabrolu. ScienceWorld: Is your agent smarter than a 5th grader? In EMNLP, 2022.
  60. Zihan Wang, Kangrui Wang, Qineng Wang, Pingyue Zhang, Linjie Li, Zhengyuan Yang, Xing Jin, Kefan Yu, Minh Nhat Nguyen, Licheng Liu, et al. Ragen: Understanding self-evolution in llm agents via multi-turn reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.20073, 2025. · arXiv
  61. Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed H. Chi, Quoc V. Le, and Denny Zhou. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. In NeurIPS, 2022.
  62. Zhepei Wei, Wenlin Yao, Yao Liu, Weizhi Zhang, Qin Lu, Liang Qiu, Changlong Yu, Puyang Xu, Chao Zhang, Bing Yin, et al. Webagent-r1: Training web agents via end-to-end multi-turn reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16421, 2025b. · arXiv
  63. Ronald J Williams. Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforcement learning. Machine learning, 8(3):229-256, 1992.
  64. Jian Wu, Linyi Yang, Zhen Wang, Manabu Okumura, and Yue Zhang. Cofca: A step-wise counterfactual multi-hop qa benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.11924, 2024. · arXiv
  65. Jian Xie, Kai Zhang, Jiangjie Chen, Tinghui Zhu, Renze Lou, Yuandong Tian, Yanghua Xiao, and Yu Su. Travelplanner: A benchmark for real-world planning with language agents. In ICML, 2024a.
  66. Jian Xie, Kexun Zhang, Jiangjie Chen, Siyu Yuan, Kai Zhang, Yikai Zhang, Lei Li, and Yanghua Xiao. Revealing the barriers of language agents in planning. In NAACL, 2025.
  67. Tianbao Xie, Danyang Zhang, Jixuan Chen, Xiaochuan Li, Siheng Zhao, Ruisheng Cao, Toh J Hua, Zhoujun Cheng, Dongchan Shin, Fangyu Lei, et al. Osworld: Benchmarking multimodal agents for open-ended tasks in real computer environments. In NeurIPS, 2024b.
  68. Ke Yang, Yao Liu, Sapana Chaudhary, Rasool Fakoor, Pratik Chaudhari, George Karypis, and Huzefa Rangwala. Agentoccam: A simple yet strong baseline for llm-based web agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13825, 2024. · arXiv
  69. Zhilin Yang, Peng Qi, Saizheng Zhang, Yoshua Bengio, William Cohen, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Christopher D. Manning. HotpotQA: A dataset for diverse, explainable multi-hop question answering. In EMNLP, 2018.
  70. Shunyu Yao, Howard Chen, John Yang, and Karthik Narasimhan. Webshop: Towards scalable real-world web interaction with grounded language agents. In NeurIPS, 2022.
  71. Shunyu Yao, Noah Shinn, Pedram Razavi, and Karthik R Narasimhan. τ -bench: A benchmark for tool-agent-user interaction in real-world domains. In ICLR, 2025.
  72. Eric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, Jesse Mu, and Noah D. Goodman. Star: Bootstrapping reasoning with reasoning. In NeurIPS, 2022.
  73. Junlei Zhang, Zichen Ding, Chang Ma, Zijie Chen, Qiushi Sun, Zhenzhong Lan, and Junxian He. Breaking the data barrier -building gui agents through task generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10127, 2025. · arXiv
  74. Boyuan Zheng, Boyu Gou, Jihyung Kil, Huan Sun, and Yu Su. Gpt-4v(ision) is a generalist web agent, if grounded. In ICML, 2024a.
  75. Yaowei Zheng, Richong Zhang, Junhao Zhang, Yanhan Ye, Zheyan Luo, Zhangchi Feng, and Yongqiang Ma. Llamafac- tory: Unified efficient fine-tuning of 100+ language models. In ACL: System Demonstrations, 2024b.
  76. Shuyan Zhou, Frank F. Xu, Hao Zhu, Xuhui Zhou, Robert Lo, Abishek Sridhar, Xianyi Cheng, Tianyue Ou, Yonatan Bisk, Daniel Fried, Uri Alon, and Graham Neubig. Webarena: A realistic web environment for building autonomous agents. In ICLR, 2024.
  77. Yifei Zhou, Sergey Levine, Jason Weston, Xian Li, and Sainbayar Sukhbaatar. Self-challenging language model agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01716, 2025a. · arXiv
  78. Yifei Zhou, Qianlan Yang, Kaixiang Lin, Min Bai, Xiong Zhou, Yu-Xiong Wang, Sergey Levine, and Li Erran Li. Proposer-agent-evaluator (PAE): Autonomous skill discovery for foundation model internet agents. In ICML, 2025b. Training Example | WebArena Task: What are the top-3 best-selling products in January 2023? Current State: [1281] RootWebArea 'Products / Inventory / Catalog / Magento Admin' [1334] link 'Magento Admin Panel' [1343] img 'Magento Admin Panel' [1286] menubar " orientation: horizontal [1288] link 'ue604 DASHBOARD' [1292] link 'ue60b SALES' [1296] link 'ue608 CATALOG' [1300] link 'ue603 CUSTOMERS' [1304] link 'ue609 MARKETING' [1308] link 'ue602 CONTENT' [1312] link 'ue60a REPORTS' . . . [2146] button 'ue605Filters' . . .

Authors
Zhang, K., Chen, X., Liu, B., Xue, T., Liao, Z., Liu, Z., Wang, X., Ning, Y., Chen, Z., Fu, X., Xie, J., Sun, Y., Gou, B., Qi, Q., Meng, Z., Yang, J., Zhang, N., Li, X., Shah, A., Huynh, D., Li, H., Yang, Z., Cao, S., Jang, L., Zhou, S., Zhu, J., Sun, H., Weston, J., Su, Y., & Wu, Y.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416385880
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
language agents, early life experience, self-supervised learning, self-reflection, reinforcement learning, imitation learning, out-of-domain generalization, expert demonstrations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review