The DOI matches its DataCite record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ctrl-World: A Controllable Generative World Model for Robot Manipulation
Abstract
Generalist robot policies can now perform a wide range of manipulation skills, but evaluating and improving their ability with unfamiliar objects and instructions remains a significant challenge. Rigorous evaluation requires a large number of real-world rollouts, while systematic improvement demands additional corrective data with expert labels. Both of these processes are slow, costly, and difficult to scale. World models offer a promising, scalable alternative by enabling policies to rollout within imagination space. However, a key challenge is building a controllable world model that can handle multi-step interactions with generalist robot policies. This requires a world model compatible with modern generalist policies by supporting multi-view prediction, fine-grained action control, and consistent long-horizon interactions, which is not achieved by previous works. In this paper, we make a step forward by introducing a controllable multi-view world model that can be used to evaluate and improve the instruction-following ability of generalist robot policies. Our model maintains long-horizon consistency with a pose-conditioned memory retrieval mechanism and achieves precise action control through frame-level action conditioning. Trained on the DROID dataset (95k trajectories, 564 scenes), our model generates spatially and temporally consistent trajectories under novel scenarios and new camera placements for over 20 seconds. We show that our method can accurately rank policy performance without real-world robot rollouts. Moreover, by synthesizing successful trajectories in imagination and using them for supervised fine-tuning, our approach can improve policy success by 44.7\%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardware
Zhao, T. Z., Kumar, V., Levine, S., & Finn, C. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.13705 · Cited by 673
Self-citationTowards Accurate Generative Models of Video: A New Metric & Challenges
Unterthiner, T., van Steenkiste, S., Kurach, K., Marinier, R., Michalski, M., & Gelly, S. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.01717 · Cited by 204
FAST: Efficient Action Tokenization for Vision-Language-Action Models
Pertsch, K., Stachowicz, K., Ichter, B., Driess, D., Nair, S., Vuong, Q., Mees, O., Finn, C., & Levine, S. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.09747 · Cited by 73
Self-citationWan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Models
Wan, T., Wang, A., Ai, B., Wen, B., Mao, C., Xie, C.-W., Chen, D., Yu, F., Zhao, H., Yang, J., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.20314 · Cited by 14
Self-citationDreamGen: Unlocking Generalization in Robot Learning through Video World Models
Jang, J., Ye, S., Lin, Z., Xiang, J., Bjorck, J., Fang, Y., Hu, F., Huang, S., Kundalia, K., Lin, Y.-C., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.12705 · Cited by 1 · cited 1×
“Some works leverage video prediction models to synthesize robotic trajectories with fake action labels, and these synthetic trajectories can then be used for policy learning (Jang et al., 2025; Bharadhwaj et al., 2024).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Memory in the Age of AI Agents
Hu, Y., Liu, S., Yue, Y., Zhang, G., Liu, B., Zhu, F., Lin, J., Guo, H., Dou, S., Xi, Z., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.13564 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, Y., Shi, L. X., Chen, J., & Finn, C.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- arXiv
- 2510.10125
- References
- 5
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review