PreprintCited by 1Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataNatural Language Processing TechniquesSpeech and dialogue systems

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Privacy-R1: Privacy-Aware Multi-LLM Agent Collaboration via Reinforcement Learning

Open access

Abstract

When users submit queries to Large Language Models (LLMs), their prompts can often contain sensitive data, forcing a difficult choice: Send the query to a powerful proprietary LLM providers to achieving state-of-the-art performance and risk data exposure, or relying on smaller, local models guarantees data privacy but often results in a degradation of task performance. Prior approaches have relied on static pipelines that use LLM rewriting, which shatters linguistic coherence and indiscriminately removes privacy-sensitive information, including task-critical content. We reformulate this challenge (Privacy-Conscious Delegation) as a sequential decision-making problem and introduce a novel reinforcement learning (RL) framework called Privacy-R1 to solve it. Our framework trains an agent to dynamically route text chunks, learning a policy that optimally balances the trade-off between privacy leakage and task performance. It implicitly distinguishes between replaceable Personally Identifiable Information (PII) (which it shields locally) and task-critical PII (which it strategically sends to the remote model for maximal utility). To validate our approach in complex scenarios, we also introduce a new medical dataset with high PII density. Our framework achieves a new state-of-the-art on the privacy-utility frontier, demonstrating the necessity of learned, adaptive policies for deploying LLMs in sensitive environments. Dataset can be found at: https://github.com/zackhuiiiii/Privacy-R1.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2510.16054

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PrivacyPAD applies reinforcement learning for privacy-aware delegation but without formal security properties.

    “PrivacyPAD [31] applies reinforcement learning for privacy-aware delegation but without formal security properties.”

    From SentinelAgent: Intent-Verified Delegation Chains for Securing Federal Multi-Agent AI Systems (2026) · cites this paper as [31]

    Section 4 describes reinforcement learning for privacy-conscious delegation, and the Dataset Creation section explicitly says the system offers risk mitigation, not a formal privacy guarantee. However, the paper calls that system Privacy-R1, not PrivacyPAD, so the cited source does not support the system identification in the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, and 1 others. 2023. Gpt-4 techni- cal report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774. · arXiv
  2. Lin Ai, Tharindu Sandaruwan Kumarage, Amrita Bhat- tacharjee, Zizhou Liu, Zheng Hui, Michael S. Davin- roy, James Cook, Laura Cassani, Kirill Trapeznikov, Matthias Kirchner, Arslan Basharat, Anthony Hoogs, Joshua Garland, Huan Liu, and Julia Hirschberg. 2024. Defending against social engineering attacks in the age of LLMs. In Proceedings of the 2024 Con- ference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 12880-12902, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Davide Andreoletti, Tanya Velichkova, Giacomo Verti- cale, Massimo Tornatore, and Silvia Giordano. 2020. A privacy-preserving reinforcement learning algo- rithm for multi-domain virtual network embedding. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Manage- ment, 17(4):2291-2304.
  4. Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, and 1 others. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877-1901.
  5. Tuhin Chakrabarty, Vishakh Padmakumar, Faeze Brah- man, and Smaranda Muresan. 2024. Creativity sup- port in the age of large language models: An empiri- cal study involving professional writers. In Proceed- ings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cogni- tion, pages 132-155.
  6. Yijiang River Dong, Tiancheng Hu, Zheng Hui, and Nigel Collier. 2026a. Steer model beyond assistant: Controlling system prompt strength via contrastive decoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.06403. · arXiv
  7. Yijiang River Dong, Tiancheng Hu, Zheng Hui, Caiqi Zhang, Ivan Vulić, Andreea Bobu, and Nigel Col- lier. 2026b. Value of information: A framework for human-agent communication. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.06407. · arXiv
  8. Aaron Grattafiori, Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al- Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Alex Vaughan, and 1 others. 2024. The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783. · arXiv
  9. Guntur Budi Herwanto, Gerald Quirchmayr, and A Min Tjoa. 2021. A named entity recognition based ap- proach for privacy requirements engineering. In 2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engi- neering Conference Workshops (REW), pages 406- 411. IEEE.
  10. Soumyadeep Hore, Jalal Ghadermazi, Diwas Paudel, Ankit Shah, Tapas Das, and Nathaniel Bastian. 2025. Deep packgen: A deep reinforcement learning frame- work for adversarial network packet generation. ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security, 28(2):1- 33.
  11. Wei-Chieh Huang, Weizhi Zhang, Yueqing Liang, Yuanchen Bei, Yankai Chen, Tao Feng, Xinyu Pan, Zhen Tan, Yu Wang, Tianxin Wei, and 1 others. 2026. Rethinking memory mechanisms of foun- dation agents in the second half. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.06052. · arXiv
  12. Zheng Hui, Yijiang River Dong, Ehsan Shareghi, and Nigel Collier. 2025a. Trident: Benchmarking llm safety in finance, medicine, and law. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.21134. · arXiv
  13. Zheng Hui, Zhaoxiao Guo, Hang Zhao, Juanyong Duan, Lin Ai, Yinheng Li, Julia Hirschberg, and Congrui Huang. 2025b. Toxilab: How well do open-source llms generate synthetic toxicity data? Preprint, arXiv:2411.15175. · arXiv
  14. Zheng Hui, Zhaoxiao Guo, Hang Zhao, Juanyong Duan, and Congrui Huang. 2024. ToxiCraft: A novel frame- work for synthetic generation of harmful information. In Findings of the Association for Computational 10 45933 Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, pages 16632-16647, Mi- ami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  15. Zheng Hui, Xiaokai Wei, Yexi Jiang, Kevin Gao, Chen Wang, Se-eun Yoon, Rachit Pareek, and Michelle Gong. 2026. Toward safe and human-aligned game conversational recommendation via multi-agent de- composition. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2026, pages 4568- 4584, Rabat, Morocco. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. · DOI
  16. Albert Q. Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Arthur Men- sch, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Florian Bressand, Gianna Lengyel, Guil- laume Lample, Lucile Saulnier, Lélio Renard Lavaud, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Pierre Stock, Teven Le Scao, Thibaut Lavril, Thomas Wang, Timothée Lacroix, and William El Sayed. 2023. Mistral 7b. Preprint, arXiv:2310.06825. · arXiv
  17. Nikhil Kandpal, Eric Wallace, and Colin Raffel. 2022. Deduplicating training data mitigates privacy risks in language models. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 10697-10707.
  18. PMLR.
  19. Noam Kolt, Nicholas Caputo, Jack Boeglin, Cullen O'Keefe, Rishi Bommasani, Stephen Casper, Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, Noah Feldman, Iason Gabriel, Gillian K Hadfield, and 1 others. 2026. Le- gal alignment for safe and ethical ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.04175. · arXiv
  20. Siyan Li, Vethavikashini Chithrra Raghuram, Omar Khattab, Julia Hirschberg, and Zhou Yu. 2025. PA- PILLON: Privacy preservation from Internet-based and local language model ensembles. In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 3371-3390, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  21. Yuanchun Li, Hao Wen, Weijun Wang, Xiangyu Li, Yizhen Yuan, Guohong Liu, Jiacheng Liu, Wenx- ing Xu, Xiang Wang, Yi Sun, and 1 others. 2024. Personal llm agents: Insights and survey about the capability, efficiency and security. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.05459. · arXiv
  22. Darshini Mahendran, Changqing Luo, and Bridget T Mcinnes. 2021. Privacy-preservation in the con- text of natural language processing. IEEE access, 9:147600-147612.
  23. Niloofar Mireshghallah, Maria Antoniak, Yash More, Yejin Choi, and Golnoosh Farnadi. 2024. Trust no bot: Discovering personal disclosures in human- LLM conversations in the wild. In First Conference on Language Modeling.
  24. Kanghua Mo, Peigen Ye, Xiaojun Ren, Shaowei Wang, Wenjun Li, and Jin Li. 2024. Security and privacy issues in deep reinforcement learning: Threats and countermeasures. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(6):1- 39.
  25. Sandeep Pamarthi. 2024. Ai meets anonymity: How named entity recognition is redefining data privacy. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 22(1):2045-2053.
  26. Dan Qiao and Yu-Xiang Wang. 2023. Offline reinforce- ment learning with differential privacy. Advances in neural information processing systems, 36:61395- 61436.
  27. Vishal Rathod, Seyedsina Nabavirazavi, Samira Zad, and Sundararaja Sitharama Iyengar. 2025. Privacy and security challenges in large language models. In 2025 IEEE 15th Annual Computing and Communi- cation Workshop and Conference (CCWC), pages 00746-00752. IEEE.
  28. Mahefa Abel Razafinirina, William Germain Dimbisoa, and Thomas Mahatody. 2024. Pedagogical align- ment of large language models (llm) for personal- ized learning: a survey, trends and challenges. Jour- nal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, 16(4):448-480.
  29. Elena Sofia Ruzzetti, Giancarlo A. Xompero, Davide Venditti, and Fabio Massimo Zanzotto. 2025. Private memorization editing: Turning memorization into a defense to strengthen data privacy in large language models. In Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol- ume 1: Long Papers), pages 16572-16592, Vienna, Austria. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  30. Biswanath Saha. 2025. Cloud-enhanced gans for syn- thetic data generation in privacy-preserving machine learning. Available at SSRN 5224774.
  31. John Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Radford, and Oleg Klimov. 2017. Proxi- mal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347. · arXiv
  32. Thanveer Shaik, Xiaohui Tao, Lin Li, Haoran Xie, Tao- tao Cai, Xiaofeng Zhu, and Qing Li. 2024. Framu: Attention-based machine unlearning using feder- ated reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 36(10):5153- 5167. · DOI
  33. Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, and 1 others. 2023. Llama: Open and effi- cient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971. · arXiv
  34. Yaxuan Wang, Jiaheng Wei, Chris Yuhao Liu, Jinlong Pang, Quan Liu, Ankit Shah, Yujia Bao, Yang Liu, 11 45934 and Wei Wei. 2024. LLM unlearning via loss ad- justment with only forget data. In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representa- tions.
  35. An Yang, Anfeng Li, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Gao, Chengen Huang, Chenxu Lv, and 1 others. 2025. Qwen3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388. · arXiv
  36. Guangtao Zeng, Wenmian Yang, Zeqian Ju, Yue Yang, Sicheng Wang, Ruisi Zhang, Meng Zhou, Jiaqi Zeng, Xiangyu Dong, Ruoyu Zhang, Hongchao Fang, Penghui Zhu, Shu Chen, and Pengtao Xie. 2020. MedDialog: Large-scale medical dialogue datasets. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 9241-9250, Online. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. · DOI
  37. Weizhi Zhang, Xiaokai Wei, Wei-Chieh Huang, Zheng Hui, Chen Wang, Michelle Gong, and Philip S Yu. 2026. Memorycd: Benchmarking long-context user memory of llm agents for lifelong cross-domain per- sonalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.25973. 12 45935 · arXiv

Metadata

Authors
Hui, Z., Dong, Y. R., Sivapiromrat, S., Shareghi, E., & Collier, N.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
Pages
45924-45937
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415948652
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
8.94
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
LLM agents, agent cooperation, reinforcement learning, privacy preservation, multi-agent reinforcement learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review